- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS
ISSN : 1738-3110
Personality Traits versus Public Service Motivation: Motive Distribution of Vietnamese Generation Z
LE, Tri D.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose: Public sector is usually not an attractive career choice for the youths, due to the uncompetitive income and the working environment. Therefore, understanding the motivations of the Generation Z, the currently early-career employees, to work in the public sector is important. This research aims to address a gap in the literature on the linkage between Personality Traits of Generation Z and Public Service Motivation (PSM). Research Design, Data, and Methodology: Using the sample of Vietnamese generation Z, it shows how individual personality, as defined by the Big Five, affects PSM. A quantitative survey of 355 university students, who are members of this generation and are preparing to join the labor market, was undertaken. We used SEM to examine the results. Results: Our findings show that Agreeableness, Neuroticism, and Conscientiousness are significant antecedents of PSM. Agreeableness, which leads to three PSM dimensions, namely Compassion, Self-Sacrifice, and Commitment to Public Values, is the best predictor of this motivation. Meanwhile, Neuroticism and Conscientiousness only affect the dimension of Compassion. Conclusion: This study adds to the limited current knowledge on the personality-PSM relationship among generation Z. The distribution of affective (Compassion, Self-Sacrifice) and norm-based (Commitment to Public Values) motives provide insight for both career counselors and recruiters in public service delivery.
- keywords
- Public Service Motivation, Personality Traits, Generation Z, SEM, Motive Distribution
Reference
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
Berings, D., De Fruyt, F., & Bouwen, R. (2004). Work values and personality traits as predictors of enterprising and social vocational interests. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(2), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191–8869(03)00101-6
Carpenter, J., Doverspike, D., & Miguel, R. F. (2012). Public service motivation as a predictor of attraction to the public sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.004
Cooper, C. A., Carpenter, D., Reiner, A., & McCord, D. M. (2014). Personality and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from a Sample of Street-Level Bureaucrats. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(3), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.798810
Cooper, C. A., Knotts, H. G., McCord, D. M., & Johnson, A. (2013). Taking Personality Seriously: The Five-Factor Model and Public Management. American Review of Public Administration, 43(4), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012446509
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
Csiszárik-Kocsír, Á., & Garia-Fodor, M. (2018). Motivation analysing and preference system of choosing a workplace as segmentation criteria based on a country wide research result focus on generation of Z. Online Journal Modelling the New Europe, 27, 67–85. https://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2018.27.03
Diefendorff, J. M., Croyle, M. H., & Gosserand, R. H. (2005). The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.02.001
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
Duffy, R. D., Borges, N. J., & Hartung, P. J. (2009). Personality, vocational interests, and work values of medical students. Journal of Career Assessment, 17(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072708329035
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Furnham, A., Eracleous, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Personality, motivation and job satisfaction: Hertzberg meets the Big Five. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(8), 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910996789
Furnham, A., Petrides, K. V., Tsaousis, I., Pappas, K., & Garrod, D. (2005). A cross-cultural investigation into the relationships between personality traits and work values. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 139(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.1.5-32
Gans-Morse, J., Kalgin, A., Klimenko, A., Vorobyev, D., & Yakovlev, A. (2022). Public service motivation and sectoral employment in Russia: New perspectives on the attraction vs. socialization debate. International Public Management Journal, 25(4), 497-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1841692
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000031
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
Graczyk-Kucharska, M., & Erickson, G. S. (2020). A person-organization fit Model of Generation Z: Preliminary studies. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 16(4), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.7341/20201645
Hai, N. C. (2021). Traditional Cultural Values of the Vietnamese nation. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6, 70–73. https://doi.org/10.29013/EJHSS-19-6-70-73
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
Hoang, T., Hue, H., Thai, H. V., & Hue, H. (2021). A Link between Public Service Motivation, Employee Outcomes, and Person – Organization Fit: Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1912086
Holt, S. B. (2018). For Those Who Care: The Effect of Public Service Motivation on Sector Selection. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12906
Jang, C. L. (2012). The effect of personality traits on public service motivation: Evidence from Taiwan. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(5), 725–734. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.5.725
Jiang, C., Wang, D., & Zhou, F. (2009). Personality traits and job performance in local government organizations in China. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(4), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.4.451
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy. In Handbook of personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102–138.
Kim, S. (2009a). Revising Perry’s measurement scale of public service motivation. American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008317681
Kim, S. (2009b). Testing the structure of public service motivation in Korea: A research note. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup019
Kim, S. (2011). Testing a revised measure of public service motivation: Reflective versus formative specification. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 521–546. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq048
Kim, S. (2016). Comparison of a Multidimensional to a Unidimensional Measure of Public Service Motivation: Predicting Work Attitudes. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(6), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1141426
Kim, S., & Vandenabeele, W. (2010). A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 701–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02198.x
Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., & De Vivo, P. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus027
Kjeldsen, A. M. (2012). Vocational Study and Public Service Motivation: Disentangling the Socializing Effects of Higher Education. International Public Management Journal, 15(4), 500–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2012.761078
Kjeldsen, A. M. (2014). Dynamics of Public Service Motivation: Attraction-Selection and Socialization in the Production and Regulation of Social Services. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12154
Kjeldsen, A. M., & Jacobsen, C. B. (2013). Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 899–926. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus039
McCrae. (2000). Trait Psychology and the Revival of Personality and Culture Studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(1), 10–31.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Comparison of EPI and psychoticism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(5), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90008-X
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An Introduction to the Five‐Factor Model and Its Applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
Moon, H. (2001). The two faces of conscientiousness: Duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.535
Ng, E. S. W., & Gossett, C. W. (2013). Career choice in Canadian public service: An exploration of fit with the millennial generation. Public Personnel Management, 42(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026013495767
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292.
Perry & Wise. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00466.x
Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024303
Ritz, A. (2011). Attraction to public policy-making: A qualitative inquiry into improvements in PSM measurement. Public Administration, 89(3), 1128–1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01923.x
Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A., & Neumann, O. (2016). Public Service Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review and Outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12505
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers - a Brief Version of Goldberg Unipolar Big-5 Markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506–516.
Stillman, D., & Stillman, J. (2017). Gen Z @ Work: How the Next Generation Is Transforming the Workplace. HarperCollins.
Van Witteloostuijn, A., Esteve, M., & Boyne, G. (2017). Public sector motivation ad fonts: Personality traits as antecedents of the motivation to serve the public interest. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw027
Vandenabeele, W. (2008a). Development of a public service motivation measurement scale: Corroborating and extending perry’s measurement instrument. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887970
Vandenabeele, W. (2008b). Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice. Public Administration, 86(4), 1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00728.x
Vandenabeele, W., Ritz, A., & Neumann, O. (2018). Public service motivation: State of the art and conceptual cleanup. The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_13
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations