바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Four-year-Old Children's Induction of Properties according to Phonological Similarity and Familiarity of Labels

Abstract

This study focuses on the theoretical debate on whether children treat labels as category markers or as features of objects when they perform induction task. We investigated whether the phonological similarity and familiarity of labels contribute to the induction of properties and tested the prediction of the similarity-based model in the induction of properties. 100 4-year-olds performed the induction of properties according to phonological similarity and familarity of labels. The results indicate that phonological similarity affects the induction of properties and support the prediction of similarity- based model. Overall, the results support the idea that young children consider labels as properties of objects, while challenging the idea that children have a prior knowledge that labels are symbols denoting categories.

keywords
Submission Date
2009-10-15
Revised Date
2009-11-11
Accepted Date
2009-11-11

Reference

1.

강용순 (2004). 영어 강세의 이해. 서울: 경진문화사.

2.

이용재 (2004). 영어의 발음. 서울: 한국문화사.

3.

신지영, 차재은 (2008). 우리말 소리의 체계. 서울: 한국문화사.

4.

Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2005a). Phoneme similarity and confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 339-362.

5.

Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2005b). What makes words sound similar? Cognition, 97, 227-267.

6.

Balaban, M. T., & Waxman, S. R. (1997). Do words facilitate object categorization in 9-month-old infants? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64(1), 3-26.

7.

Davidson, N. S., & Gelman, S. A. (1990). Inductions from novel categories: The role of language and conceptual structure. Cognitive Development, 5, 151-176.

8.

Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition. New York: Oxford.

9.

Fisher, A. V., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2005). When induction meets memory: Evidence for gradual transition from similarity-based to category-based induction. Child Development, 76, 1-15.

10.

Fulkerson, A. L., & Haaf, R. A. (2003). The influence of labels, non-labeling sounds, and source of auditory input on 9- and 15-month-olds’ object categorization. Infancy, 4, 349-369.

11.

Fulkerson, A. L., Waxman, S. R., & Seymour, J. M. (2006). Linking object names and object categories: Words (but not tones) facilitate object categorization in 6- and 12-month-olds. In Bamman, D., Magnitskaia, T., & Zaller, C. (Eds.) Supplement to the Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Cascadilla Press.

12.

Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. (1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2 year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 26, 796-804.

13.

Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23, 183-209.

14.

Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. (1987). Young children's inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development, 58, 1532-1541.

15.

Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 501-518.

16.

Graham, S., & Kilbreath, C. S. (2007). "It’s a sign of the kind: Gestures and words guide infants’ inductive inferences" Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1111-1123.

17.

Jaswal, V. K. (2004). Don’t believe everything you hear: Preschoolers’ sensitivity to speaker intent in category induction. Child Development, 75, 1871-1885.

18.

Jones, S. S., & Smith, L. B. (2002). How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names. Developmental Science, 5, 219-232.

19.

Keil. F. C., Smith, W. C., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Two dogmas of conceptual empiricism: Implications for hybrid models of the structure of knowledge. Cognition, 65, 103-135.

20.

Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York, John Wiley & Sons.

21.

Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1981). Strategies and classification. learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,. & Cognition, 7, 241-253

22.

Merriman, W. E., & Bowerman, L. L. (1989). The mutual exclusivity bias in children's word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 54 3-4.

23.

Merriman, W. E., Lipko, A. R., & Evey, J. A. (2008). How young children judge whether a word is one they know:. A dual criterion account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101(2), 83-98.

24.

Murphy G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

25.

Sloutsky, V. M. (2003). The role of similarity in the development of categorization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 246-251.

26.

Sloutsky, V. M., & Fisher, A. V. (2004a). Induction and Categorization in Young Children: A Similarity-Based Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 166-188.

27.

Sloutsky, V. M., & Fisher, A. V. (2004b). When development and learning decrease memory: Evidence against category-based induction in children. Psychological Science, 15, 553-558.

28.

Sloutsky, V. M., & Fisher, A. V. (in press). Do zedras have stripes? : Effects of phonological similarity of labels on young children's induction.

29.

Sloutsky, V. M., & Lo, Y.-F. (1999). How much does a shared name make things similar? Part 1. Linguistic labels and the development of similarity judgment. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1478-1492.

30.

Sloutsky, V. M., & Napolitano, A. (2003). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Preference for auditory modality in young children. Child Development, 74, 822-833.

31.

Sloutsky, V. M., Lo, Y.-F., & Fisher, A. V. (2001). How much does a shared name make things similar: Linguistic labels and the development of inductive inference. Child Development, 72, 1695-1709.

32.

Welder, A. N., & Graham, S. A. (2004). The influences of shape similarity and shared labels on infants' inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties. Child Development, 72, 1653-1673.

logo