바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

모의 자율성지지 및 조건부 관심, 자율적 동기, 친사회적 행동 간의 구조적 관계분석

Structural Relationships Among Perceived Mother’s Autonomy Support, Conditional Regard, Autonomous motivation and Prosocial Behavior

초록

본 연구에서는 자기결정성이론(Self-determination-Theory)과 Rogers의 인간중심적 접근에 근거하여 모의 양육태도(자율성지지 vs. 조건부 관심)가 자녀의 동기(자율적 vs. 통제적)를 매개로 하여 친사회적 행동에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 지 확인해 보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 이론 및 선행연구에 근거한 연구모형을 수립하고 이를 검증하였다. 본 연구에는 대학생 166명이 참여하였으며, 이들은 모의 자율성지지 태도, 조건부 관심 태도(조건부 관심강화 또는 조건부 관심철회), 자율적 동기, 통제적 동기 및 친사회적 행동 경향성을 자기보고식으로 평정하였다. 구조방정식 모형을 통해 연구모형의 적합도와 매개효과를 검증한 결과, 모의 자율성지지 양육태도는 자율적 동기를 매개로 하여 친사회적 행동을 정적으로 예측하였으며, 모의 조건부 관심 양육태도는 통제적 동기를 매개로 하여 자녀의 친사회적 행동을 부적으로 예측하는 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구는 모의 자율성지지 양육태도 또는 조건부관심 양육태도와 친사회적 행동 간의 관계를 이해할 때 자율적 동기 또는 통제적 동기와 같은 동기 변인이 함께 고려되어야 할 필요가 있음을 시사한다. 또한 본 연구는 모의 자율성지지 양육태도가 자녀의 자율적 동기 및 친사회적 행동에 미치는 순기능적 역할 및 모의 조건부관심 양육태도가 자녀의 통제적 동기 및 친사회적 행동에 미치는 역기능적 역할을 실증적으로 확인함으로써 양육프로그램 개발에 필요한 정보를 제공할 수 있다는 점에서 연구의 유의미성을 짚어볼 수 있겠다.

keywords
자율성지지, 조건부 관심, 자율적 동기, 통제적 동기, 친사회적 행동의 경향성, autonomy support, conditional regard, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, prosocial behavior tendencies

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the structural relations among perceived mother's autonomy support, conditional regard, autonomous motivation and prosocial behavior. This study investigated whether autonomous motivation mediates the otherwise direct effects that perceived mother's autonomy support and conditional regard have on prosocial behavior. One-hundred and sixty six students self-reported their class-specific perceived mother's autonomy support, conditional regard, autonomous motivation and prosocial behavior. Structural analyses showed that autonomy support contributed positively to autonomous motivation while conditional regard(conditional positive regard and conditional negative regard) contributed positively controlled motivation; autonomous motivation in turn contributed positively to prosocial behavior while controlled motivation contributed negatively to prosocial behavior. Test for mediation showed that autonomous motivation mediated the direct effect autonomy support had on prosocial behavior.; while controlled motivation mediated the direct effect conditional regard had prosocial behavior.

keywords
자율성지지, 조건부 관심, 자율적 동기, 통제적 동기, 친사회적 행동의 경향성, autonomy support, conditional regard, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, prosocial behavior tendencies

참고문헌

1.

권주현, 박영신 (2013). 마음의 이해와 공감이 독재자 게임에 나타난 아동의 친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향, 한국심리학회지: 발달, 26(3), 117-135.

2.

김아영, 차정은 (2010). 모의 양육행동이 아동의 양육행동 지각, 학업적 자기효능감 및 학업성취도에 미치는 효과분석: 자기조절동기의 매개효과를 중심으로, 교육심리연구, 24(3), 563-582.

3.

김주영, 김아영 (2014). 교사의 조건부 관심 및 자율성지지와 초등학생의 자기결정동기, 학업참여 및 성취도간의 관계, 교육심리연구, 28(2), 251-268.

4.

문수백 (2009). 구조방정식모델리의 이해와 적용, 학지사.

5.

이원영, 박찬옥, 노영희 (1993). 유아의 사회성 발달 프로그램 개발 연구. 서울: 한국육영회.

6.

장혜림, 정익중 (2013). 부모의 양육태도가 자아존중감을 매개로 청소년의 친사회적 행동과 공격성에 미치는 영향. 한국가족복지학, 40(6), 33-61.

7.

Altay, F. B., & Güre, A. (2012). Relationship among the parenting Styles and the Social Competence and Prosocial Behaviors of the Children Who are Attending to State and Private Preschools. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 2712-2718.

8.

Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). IBM SPSS Amos 20 user’s guide. Armonk, NY: IBM.

9.

Assor, A., Roth, G., & Deci, E. L. (2004). The emotional costs of parents' conditional regard: A SDT analysis. Journal of Personality, 72, 47-88.

10.

Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2014). Parental Conditional Regard: Psychological Costs and antecedents. Human motivation and interpersonal relationships. Springer, Netherlands, 215-237.

11.

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397-413.

12.

Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The Developmental of a Measure of Prosocial behavior for Late Adlescents. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 31(1), 31-44.

13.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

14.

Dodge, K. A. (1993). Social-cognitive mechanisms in the development of conduct disorder and depression. Department of Psychology and Human Development, 44, 559-584.

15.

Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I., Murphy, B., & Shepard, S. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolesecence and early adulthood. Journal of Research in Adolescence, 15, 235-260.

16.

Eisenberg, N. Fabes, R., & Spinrad, T. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (ed): Handbook of child psychology, volume 3: Social, Emotional, and personality development. 5th edition. New York: Wildy.

17.

Eron, L. D. (1982). Parent-child interaction, television violence, and aggression of children. American Psychologist, 37(2), 197-211.

18.

Furnham, A., & Cheng H. (2000). Perceived parental behaviour, self-esteem and happiness. Soe Psychiatry Psychiratr Epidemiol, 35, 463- 470.

19.

Gagné, M. (2003). the Role of Autonomy Support and Autonomy Orientation in Prosocial Behavior Engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199-223.

20.

Garner, P. W., & Spears, F. M. (2000). Emotion Regulation in Low-income Preschoolers. Social Development, 9(2), 246-264.

21.

Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective.In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children's internalization of values (pp. 35-161). New York: Wiley.

22.

Grolnick, W. S., Kurowski. C. O., McMenamy, J. M., Rivkin, I., & Bridges, L. J. (1998). Mothers' strategies for regulating their toddlers' distress. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 437-450.

23.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644-661.

24.

Knafo, A. and Plomin, R. (2006). Parental discipline and affection and children's prosocial behavior: Genetic and environmental links, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1,), 147-164.

25.

Koestner, R., Vernieri, F., & Zuckemann, M (1992). Self-regulation and consistency between attitudes, traits and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 52-59.

26.

Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J. (1996). Linkages between friendship and adjustment during early school transition. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup(Eds). The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence, 322-345. Cambridge University Press.

27.

Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and Competence in German and American University Students: A Comparative Study Based on Self-determination Theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 1-68.

28.

Patterson, D. J., Cohn, D. A., and Kao, B. T. (1989). Maternal warmth as a protective factor against risks with peer rejection among children, Developmental and Psychology, 1, 21-38.

29.

Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2011). Highlingting relatedness promotes prosocial motivation and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 905-917.

30.

Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2012). “I Help Because I Want to, Not Because You Tell Me to”: Empathy Increases Autonomously Motivated Helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 681-689.

31.

Recchia, H. E., Wainryb, C. Bourne, S., & Pasypathi, M. (2014). The construction of moral agency in mother-child conversations about helping and hurting across childhood and adolescence. Developmental psychology, 50(1), 34.

32.

Ridgy, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 165-185.

33.

Rogers, C. R. (1965). Some questions and challenges facing a humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 5(1), 1-5.

34.

Roth, G., & Assor, A. (2012). The costs of parental pressure to express emotions: Conditional regard and autonomy support as predictors of emotion regulation and intimacy. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 799-808.

35.

Roth, G., Assor, A., P. Niemiec, C., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The emotional and academic consequences of parental conditional regard: Comparing conditional positive regard, conditional negative regard, and autonomy support as parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1119-1142.

36.

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(5), 749-761.

37.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.

38.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist,55, 68-78.

39.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: Anorganismic- dialecticalperspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan(Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp.3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

40.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of personality, 74(6), 1557-1586.

41.

Ryan, R. M., Ridby, S., & King, K. (1993). Two types religious internalization and their relations to religious orientations and mental health. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 65(3), 586.

42.

Ryan, R. M., & Lynch, J. H. (1989). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child development, 340-356.

43.

Scherhorn, G., & Grunert, S. C. (1988). Using the causality orientations concept on consumer behavior research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 33-39.

44.

Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 878-891.

45.

Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste. M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self- determination in 3 life domains: the role of parents' and teachers' autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589-604.

46.

Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, Extrinsic and motivational styles as predictors of behaviro: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599-620.

47.

Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy‐supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents' academic achievement. Child development, 76(2), 483-501.

48.

Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222-244.

49.

Willans, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weigh-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 115-126.

logo