바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Impact of a Brand Image Matching with the Advertising Model on Price Fairness Perceptions: Focus on Sports Advertising

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2012, v.10 no.3, pp.43-50
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.10.3.201203.43
Hwang, Hee-Joong
Shin, Seung-Ho
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study sets out to examine how a brand image that matches the advertising model has a positive impact on brand attitude and price fairness perceptions. We reviewed the constructs on the basis of previous studies and each of the concepts has been redefined. One such concept, "image congruence," refers to the harmony, fitness, and matching quality of images. For example, how well celebrity advertising model is matches the brand image shows image congruence. Results are summarized as follows: First, the congruence of brand image and sports advertising model has no significant impact on brand attitude certainty and persistence. Second, the individual's brand attitude certainty and brand attitude persistence has a positive impact on the perceptions of price fairness. Third, the congruence of brand image and sports advertising model has a positive impact on the perceptions of price fairness. The first and the third results suggest that the positive impact on the price fairness perceptions is temporary but it has insignificant effects on the formation of brand attitude causing ongoing purchases. In other words, in order to influence consumers' long-term confidence on the brand, improving the quality of products or services has to precede promotional strategies such as advertising. When an advertising model is inappropriate for the brand image, consumers perceive product price changes as a negative issue in the short term. However, in the long term, attitude formation such as consumers' repurchase intentions and word of mouth will be not affected. The second result suggests that an already existing positive brand attitude can contribute more positively to change the perceptions of price fairness. In particular, attitude persistence has greater influence than attitude certainty on the price fairness. It suggests that persistence issues such as the trading period and the frequency of transactions must be managed and controlled because they are more important than the certainty issues such as strength of belief or trust. For example, when a commercial model for expensive sporting goods matches up with the brand image, consumer feels less pressure on the price changes. However, it does not determine the consumer's repeated purchases or sustainable transactions and it also has no absolute impact on the brand trust. In other words, consumer brand attitude should be recognized and approached as a routine strategy in view of the result that it is of great value as a causal variable in the process of consumer decision-making.

keywords
브랜드 이미지, 광고모델, 이미지 일치성, 브랜드 태도 지속성, 브랜드 태도 확신성, 가격 공정성 지각

Reference

1.

성영신, 장영, 신주리(2006), “유명인 모델과 소비자의 성별 일치성및 모델의 시선 대상이 광고효과에 미치는 영향,” 광고연구, 70, 119-148.

2.

양윤, 채영지 (2004), “상표 성격과 광고모델 이미지의 일치성이광고 및 상표 선호도에 미치는 영향,” 광고학연구, 15(1),65-82.

3.

황희중 (2008), “가격변동이 소비자의 가격공정성 지각에 미치는영향에 대한 연구-거래경험,구매경험,기업특성의 조절효과를 중심으로-,” 서울대학교 박사학위논문.

4.

Abelson, R.P. (1988), “Conviction,” American Psychologist, 43,267-275.

5.

Barry, B. and Oliver R. (1996), “Affect in Dyadic Negotiation: A Model and Propositions,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 127-143.

6.

Bizer, G.Y., Tormala, Z.L., Rucker, D.D. and Petty, R.E. (2006),“Memory-based versus on-line processing: Implications for attitudestrength,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,42, 646-653.

7.

Bolton L.E, Luk, W and Alba J.W. (2003), “Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 474– 91.

8.

Campbell, M.C. (2007), “Says Who?!” “How the Source of Price Information and Affect Influence Perceived Price (Un)fairness,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 261-271.

9.

Doll, J. and Ajzen, I. (1992), “Accessibility and stability of predictors on the theory of planned behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 754-765.

10.

Folkes, V.S. (1983), “Consumer Reactions to Product Failure : An Attributional Approach,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 398-409.

11.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, K. and Thaler, R. (1986a), “Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: entitlements in the market,” American Economic Review, 76, 728-741.

12.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. and Thaler, R. (1986b), “Fairness and the assumptions of economics,” Journal of Business, 59, 285-300.

13.

Kamins, M.A. (1990), “An Investigation into the “Match-up” Hypothesis in Celebrity Advertising: When Beauty may be Only Skin Deep,” Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4-13.

14.

Kamins, M.A. and Gupta, K. (1994), “Congruence Between Spokesperson and Product Types: A Matchup Hypothesis Perspective,” Psychology & Marketing, 11(6), 569-586.

15.

Kamins, M., Brand, M., Hoeke, S. and Moe, J. (1989), “Two-Sided versus One-Sided Celebrity Endorsement : The Impact on Advertising Effectiveness and Credibility,” Journal of Advertising, 18(2), 4-10.

16.

Kanugo, R.N. and Pang, S. (1973), “Effects of human models on perceived products of quality”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(1),172-178.

17.

Kim, D.H. and Kim, S.D. (2011), “Antecedents and Consequences of Supplier’s fairness perception”, Journal of Distribution Science, 9(2), 61-72

18.

Krosnick, J.A. (1988), “Attitude importance and attitude change,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 240-255.

19.

Krosnick, J.A. and Smith, W. R. (1994), “Attitude Strength,” Encyclopedia of human Behavior, 1, 279-289.

20.

Lynch, J. and Schuler, D. (1994), “The Matchup Effect of Spokesperson and Product Congruence: A Schema Theory Interpretation,” Psychology & Marketing, 11(5), 417-445.

21.

Martin, W.C., Ponder, N and Lueg, J.E. (2009), “Price fairness perceptions and customer loyalty in a retail context,” Journal of Business Research, 62, 588-593.

22.

Misra, S. and Beatty, S.E. (1990), “Celebrity Spokesperson and Brand Congruence: An Assessment of Recall and Affect,” Journal of Business Research, 21(2), 195-213.

23.

Oliver, R.L. (1980), “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17, pp. 460-469.

24.

Oliver, R.L. and Swan, J.E. (1989), “Consumer Percept ions of Interpersonal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions : A Field Survey Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 53, 21- 35.

25.

Oliver, R.L., Shor, M. and Todd, S.T. (2004), “Induced over-benefiting and under-benefiting on the web: Inequity effects on feelings and motivations with implications for consumption behavior,” Motivation and Emotion, 28(March), 85–106.

26.

Park, N.G. (2010), “A Study on the Meaning and Strategy of Keyword Advertising Marketing,” Journal of Distrbution Science, 8(3), 49-56.

27.

Pelham, B.W. (1991), “On confidence and consequence : The certainty and importance of self-knowledge,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 518-530.

28.

Petrocelli, J.V., Tormala, Z.L. and Rucker, D.D.(2007), “Unpacking attitude certainty : Attitude clarity and attitude correctness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 30-41.

29.

Priester, J.R., Nayakankuppam, D., Fleming M.A. and Godek J. (2004),“The A2SC2 Model : The Influence of Attitudes and AttitudesStrength on Consideration and Choice,” Journal of ConsumerResearch, 30, March, 574-587.

30.

Rucker, D.D. and Petty, R.E. (2004), “When resistance is futile : Consequences of failed counterarguing for attitude certainty,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 219-235.

31.

Shiv, B. and Fedorikhin, A. (1999), “Heart and Mind in Conflict: Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26(December), 278-282.

32.

Sirgy, M.J., Grewal D., Mangleburg T.F., Park, Jae-ok, Chon, Kye-Sung, Claiborne, C.B., Johar, J.S. and Berkman H.(1997), “Assessing the Predictive Validity of Two Methods of Measuring Self-Image Congruence,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(3), 229-241.

33.

Till, B.D. and Busler, M. (1998), “Matching Products with Endorsers: Attractiveness versus Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(6), 576-584.

34.

Till, B.D. and Busler, M. (2000), “The Match-Up Hypothesis: Physical Attractiveness, Expertise, and the Role of Fit on Brand Attitude, Purchase Intent and Brand Beliefs,” Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1-13.

35.

Tormala, Z.L. and Petty, R.E. (2002). “What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1298-1313.

36.

Tormala, Z.L., Rucker, D.D. and Seger, C.R. (2008). “When increased confidence yields increased thought : A confidence-matching hypothesis,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 141-147.

37.

Xia, L., Kent M.B. (2010), “Is a good deal always fair? Examining the concepts of transaction value and price fairness,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(6), 884-894.

38.

Xia, L., Kent M.B. and Cox, J.L. (2004). “The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions,” Journal of Marketing, 68(October), 1–15.

The Journal of Distribution Science