바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study of the Effect of Model Characteristics on Purchasing intentions and Brand Attitudes

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2012, v.10 no.4, pp.47-53
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.10.4.201204.47
Kim, Sung-Duck
Youn, Myoung-Kil
Kim, Ki-Soo

Abstract

Businesses make use of advertising strategy using models to give consumers efficient product information. Modern advertisements often make use of models for greater reminiscence to create messages and remind viewers of the product. The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of each type of model. The subjects were 230 college students in their twenties or older, and the material was collected from October 20, 2011 to November 5, 2011 to examine the effects of model characteristics on buying intention as well as attitude toward a brand. A questionnaire survey was used; investigators gave one copy to each interviewee. The study investigated the characteristics of each model using a questionnaire of each 40 copies with five kinds of photographs. The characteristics of models had great influence on buying intention and attitude toward the brand: First, factor 2 (being honest and virtuous and having good credit and a good press assessment) and factor 3 (being interesting and a good communicator and creating good memories) had great influence on buying intention. Factor 2 was explained by reliability, and factor 3 by the efficiency of the model in creating a feeling. Second, factors 1 (being attractive, smart, unique, friendly, loved by others, and popular), 2, and 3 influenced attitude toward brand. Factor 1 encapsulated the outgoing characteristics of a model, factor 2 was based on reliability, and factor 3 was based on the efficiency of the model in creating a feeling. The model's positive effects on buying intention and attitudes toward brand shall be examined. For their positive influence on buying intention, reliability and efficiency shall be given attention. For their positive influence on attitude toward brand, creating a good impression, having outgoing characteristics, being reliable, and efficiency shall be given attention. The findings were as follows: Model characteristics influencing buying intention were similar to those influencing attitude toward brand. The differences were as follows. First, reliability and efficiency influenced buying intention. When customers were asked to consider the influence on buying intention of an advertisement, regardless of the strength of the buying intention, they considered these two characteristics. Customers decided to buy based not only on the credibility of the product as presented in the advertisement but also the transmission of the contents of the advertisement. Second, outgoing characteristics, reliability, and efficiency influenced attitude toward a brand. The attitude toward a brand was said to be the attitude toward the business. The attitude is produced even after buying, so businesses view it as very important. The attitude might vary depending upon the model used rather than the brand. Therefore, a model with outgoing characteristics was thought to be important. Therefore, attitude toward a brand whose model influenced buying intention as well as attitude toward brand had outgoing characteristics. The result is that an image the model was related to attitude toward the brand. As such, customers would buy the goods advertised. However, an outgoing image of a model was also important to create a positive attitude toward a business brand. For instance, talent Park Gyeong-Rim's photo was used to promote cosmetics about 10 years ago. When she worked as a model of cosmetics products, she had to make compensation for losses and damages because she made a mistake on a talk show program. At that time, customers who had bought the cosmetics product asked for refunds of several billion won. As such, models who are said to be the face of the businesses they represent can play an important role. To advertise in the most attractive and effective way, the current image of a model should be investigated by examining current activities and news articles after selecting the model, and the model's efficiency and attitude toward the brand should be examined. Factors that

keywords
광고모델의 특성, 구매의도, 브랜드 태도

Reference

1.

권오철,김진성,김판준,김판진,김홍섭,남궁석,박영근,박철주,박형진,윤명길,이장환,황화철,김유오(2007),“소매업태용어 통일화에 대한 소고”, 유통과학연구, 5(2), 5-16.

2.

김영환, 김판진(2008), “소비자들의 대형마트 PB의류 구매행동에관한 연구”, 유통과학연구, 6(1), 117-128.

3.

김춘곤, 유희경(2008), “연예인 광고모델 속성이 외식브랜드에 미치는 영향”, 호텔관광연구, 30, 18-36.

4.

나준희(2006), “모델의 매력도 및 신뢰성이 제품에 미치는 영향:(상향적)사후 가정사고의 조절효과”,광고연구, 제70권,41-63.

5.

남은우(2010), “블로그 특성이 관계품질과 구매의도에 미치는 영향”, 유통과학연구, 8(2), 45-54.

6.

박상규, 고희청(2009), “제품관여도에 따른 광고모델 유형의 광고효과 연구”, 디자인학연구, 22(5), 225-234.

7.

성영신, 장영, 신주리(2006), “유명인 모델과 소비자의 성별 일치성및 모델의 시선 대상이 광고효과에 미치는 영향”, 광고연구, 70, 119-148.

8.

안광호, 유창조(1995) 광고 원론, 서울: 법문사

9.

양윤, 채영지(2004), “상표 성격과 광고모델 이미지의 일치성이 광고및 상표 선호도에 미치는 영향”, 광고학연구, 15(1), 65-82.

10.

윤남수, 김재영, 박영균(2011), “구매자의 관여도 수준에 따라 가격할인이 지각가치,구매의향,탐색의도에 미치는 영향”, 유통과학연구, 9(1), 39-48.

11.

윤명길, 김유오(2005), “유통연구에 대한 학문적 연구(II)”, 유통과학연구, 3(1), 1-22.

12.

이승희(2005), “브랜드 이미지와 공고모델 이미지의 일치성이 패션광고효과에 미치는 영향”, 패션비즈니스, 9(4), 161-169.

13.

이정학, 방지선(2003), “제품유형에 따른 스포츠스타 광고모델이광고효과와 제품구매의도에 미치는 영향”, 한국스포츠산업경영학회지, 8(3), 192-206.

14.

최낙환, 박덕수(2011), “기업연상이 소비자의 자아연관성과 개별브랜드의 충성도에 미치는 영향”, 유통과학연구, 9(1), 5-16.

15.

Atkin, C. & Block, M.(1983). Effectiveness of celebrity endorsers. Journal of Advertising Research, 23(1), 57-61.

16.

Chaiken, Shelly and Eagly, Alice H.(1992), “The Impact of Attitudes on Behavior,” in The Psychology of Attitudes, Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

17.

Engel, James F. and Blackwell, Roger D.(1982), Consumer Behavior, Fourth edition, Chicago: The Dryden Press.

18.

Freiden, J.B.(1984). “Advertising spokesperson effects: An examination of endorser type and gender on two audiences”. Journal of Advertising Research, 24 (5), 33-41.

19.

Freidman, H.H. and Freidman, L.F.(1979), “Endorser Effectiveness by Product Type”, Journal of Advertising Research, 19(Oct), 63-71.

20.

Hirschman, Elizabeth C.(1986), “The Creation of Product Symbolism”, Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 327-331.

21.

Homer, Pamela M. and Yoon, Sun-Gil(1992), “Message Framing and Interrelationships Among Ad-Based Feelings, Affect, and Cognition”, Journal of Advertising, 21(March), 19-33.

22.

Keller, Kevin Lane(2003), Strategic Brand Management: building, measuring and managing brand equity, 2nd ed., Prentice hall.

23.

Kotler, P.(1994). Marketing Management. 8th ed. Prentice Hall International Editions.

24.

Levy, Sidney J.(1959), “Symbols for Sale,” Harvard Business Review,37(July-August), 117-124.

25.

MacKenzie, Scott B., Lutz, Richard J. & Belch, George E.(1986),“The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertisingeffectiveness: a test of competing explanations”,Journal of Mark. Res., 23(May), 130–43.

26.

Mowen, J.C. and Brown, S.(1980) “On Explaining and Predicting the Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorser”, Association for Consumer Research, 437-441.

The Journal of Distribution Science