바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Estimation of the Level of Sustainable Development in Kazakhstan Regions and Recommendation for its Increase

Estimation of the Level of Sustainable Development in Kazakhstan Regions and Recommendation for its Increase

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2012, v.10 no.7, pp.23-31
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.10.7.201207.23
Baimukhamedova, Gulzada S. (Faculty of Economics, Kazakhstan Academy of Transport and Communications)
Nurlanova, Nailya K. (The Institute of Economics, Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan)
Akhmetova, Sharzada (Open Enrollment and Certificate Program, KIMEP University)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate existing world economic science theories and concepts of sustainable development as well as create original system of criteria and indicators to assess potential and conditions for sustainable development from a regional perspective and based on the above justify proposals for public authorities to improve methods of economic regulation for regional development. To achieve the goal evolution process of existing theories and concepts of sustainable development and "green growth" have been studied in terms of its adaptation to the spatial development of Kazakhstan, comparative dynamics of natural resources consumption in the Asia-Pacific region and Kazakhstan were investigated as well. Methodology. World best theory and practice methods for assessment of the level of sustainable development of the country and some of its territories were also studied. We selected the best system of criteria and indicators for assessment of economic, social and environmental sustainability of regional systems. Methods offered in this article are based on traditional and new factors of economic development and conditions for operation of regional systems. Indicators are chosen with a glance to basic goals for future development of regions in Kazakhstan. It is recommended to use two levels of methodology offered by author, namely national and regional, and at the local level later (districts, municipalities, cities). The results. Method offered by the author has been tested based on materials and statistics of regions in Kazakhstan. Suitability and usability of the proposed system of criteria and indicators for measuring of economic, social and environmental sustainability of regional systems was proved. Based on this analysis it was found out that there are regions in Kazakhstan that differ from each other by most of key indicators of sustainable regional development and this tendency is increasing. Conclusions and recommendations. As a result of this analysis, the authors have substantiated a number of proposals on methods of analysis to be used, improvement of methods of regional development, implementation of institutional reforms, as well as improvement of regional statistics. This article provides recommendations that can be successfully used in the management practices by public authorities to implement a new regional strategy focused on sustainable development in future.

keywords
Sustainable Development, Region, Economic Regulation Methods, Regional Strategies, Factors of Economy

참고문헌

1.

Almaty(2002), “Indicators of Sustainable Development for the Republic of Kazakhstan”, Almaty, 64..

2.

Bobylev, S.N. & Solovyov, S.V. (2003), “Guidelines for the development and implementation of sustainable development indicators at the regional level”, Moscow, ERM, Publishing House of Science and Training Center, 36.

3.

Catalog Sources World Development Indicators (2010), from International Energy Agency (IEA Statistics © OECD/IEA, 2010. from http://www.iea.org/stats/index.asp).

4.

Global Energy Statistical Yearbook (2011a), from http://yearbook.enerdata.net/#/electricity-domestic-consumptiondata- by-region-in-2010.html

5.

Global Energy Statistical Yearbook (2011b), from //http://yearbook. enerdata.net/#/2010-energy-consumption-data.html

6.

Greening Growth in Asia and Pacific(2008), UN ESCAP. 73, from www.greengrowth.org

7.

Meadows, D.H.(1978), The Limits to Growth. Report of the Club of Rome, Moscow: Progress, 151.

8.

Meadows, D.H.(1994), Outside of growth, Moscow: Progress, 189.

9.

Moscow Independent Institute of International Law (1997), “Declaration of Rio de Janeiro on Environment and Development”, The current international law. V.3.687-692.

10.

Osipova, Yu.M. and Zolotovoy, E.S. (1997), Bobylev SN Russian economy and the prospects for sustainable development, 350-368. In his book “The chances of the Russian economy” Moscow: Publishing House of the TEIS, 655.

11.

The Little Green Data book (2009), U.S.A.: The World Bank, 2009,234.

12.

UN(2008), “Greening Growth in Asia and the Pacific”, United Nations 2008.

13.

ECOR/ MEA(2009), “Recommendations for energy efficiency policy”,ECOR/MEA, 84. from http://www.dw.de/dw/article/- 0,16038351,00.html

14.

UN ESCAP (2009), Co-efficiency Indicators: Measuring Resource-use efficiency and the Impact of Economic Activities on the Environment, UN ESCAP, 2009. 24, from www.greengrowth.org

15.

Wozniak, B. (1995), “Social development and the environment: the relationship, conflicts, crises”, Problems of Economics, 2, 129-130.

16.

Yesekina, B.K.(2004), Sustainable development of economic systems in the context of globalization. Almaty: De Luxe, 220.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)