ISSN : 1738-3110
Purpose - Eggs are nutritionally complete and one of the most popular natural foods. Moreover, the poultry industry is one of the important food industries. However, early industrialization of the poultry industry on its own did not lead to further development compared to other livestock industries. In this study, we investigate what factors influence consumers' behavior and how consumers' understanding of retail business affects their propensity to consume. This study is different from other studies as it analyzes how the brand names of manufacturers and distribution companies affect the purchasing characteristics or actual purchase behavior of consumers in order to suggest how these manufacturers and distribution companies can increase their competitiveness. Research design, data, methodology - This study conducted a survey of 250 randomly selected egg purchasers in discount stores from January to April 2013. Consumers' purchase tendencies were calculated through frequency analysis. This result was then utilized using cluster analysis to draw a conclusion about which purchase tendency influenced consumers buying three different brands of eggs or whether this tendency really affected consumers. As a result, the outcomes of Hypotheses 2 and 3 were not clear so we drew a conclusion with our analysis of Hypothesis 1. Results - While the outcomes of Hypotheses 2 and 3 did not clearly indicate whether purchasing tendencies affected consumers when buying eggs, our analysis of Hypothesis 1 indicated that consumers were affected by the quality of the eggs rather than exterior factors such as the brand name. Thus, we concluded that it is important to promote the excellence of the quality of the eggs. Usually firms buy eggs from farms and repackage them in order to sell them. In this sense, if consumers were aware of this egg production process, and eggs were fairly distributed to retailers, large retail PB businesses would also be able to enhance their competitiveness. Conclusions - The brand, packaging, retail outlet, and other external features influenced the purchase of eggs to a certain degree, while shelf life, grade of the eggs, cleanliness, and other intrinsic characteristics had more influence. In particular, shelf life was the most important factor influencing purchase. Consumers were influenced not only by intrinsic characteristics of the eggs but also by large-scale producers' brands. Consumers relied upon the brand despite reduced competition because they found it difficult to identify shelf life and/or cleanliness. Small businesses and/or large-scale retailers can remain competitive by maintaining the freshness and cleanliness of the eggs. Further studies need to investigate areas in which consumers' cognition of the product is poor and/or the purchase inclination with regard to less developed industries such as eggs. In this study, the greatest problem was that consumers did not consume in accordance with the current situation as consumers have preferred fresh and clean eggs for a long time compared to purchase decisions based on external brands and/or packaging.
Ailawadi, Kusum L., Neslin, Scott A., and Gedenk, Karen (2001). Pursuing the Value-Conscious Consumer: Store Brands versus National Brand Promotions. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 71-89.
Batra, R., and Sinha, I.(2000). Consumer-Level Factors Moderating the Success of Private Label Brands. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 175-191.
Caruana, A., Money, A.H., and Berthon, P.R. (2000). Service Quality and Satisfaction: the oderating Role of Value. European Journal of Marketing, 34, 1338-1352.
Corstjens, M., and R. Lal(2000) “Building store loyalty through store brands,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 281-292.
Collins-Dodd, Collen, and Lindley, Tara (2002). Store Brand and Retail Differentiation: The Influence of Store Image and Store Brand Attitudes on Store Own Brand Perceptions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10(6), 345-353.
Cowley, Elizabeth, and Mitchell, Andrew A. (2003). The Moderating Effect of Product Knowledge on the Learning and Organization of Product Information. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(December), 443-454.
Dhar, Ravi, and Wertenbroch, Klaus (2000). Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utili tarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(February), 60-71.
Everard, Andrea, and Galletta, Dennis F. (2006). How Presentation Flaws Affect Perceived Site Quality, Trust, and Intention to Purchase from an Online Store. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 55-95.
Gefen, D.E. Karahanna, and Straub, D.W. (2003). Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
Goldsmith, Ronald E., Lafferty, Barbara A., and Newell, Stephen J. (2000). The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brand. Journal of Advertising, 24(Fall), 43-44.
Jin, Byoungho, and Suh, Young-Gu (2005). Intergrating Effect of Consumer Perception Factors in Predicting Private Brand Purchase in a Korean Discount Store Context. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(2/3), 62-71.
Kang, Myung-Soo, Song, Chang-Seok, and Shin, Jong-Chil(2006). Service Employee Expertise and Relational Behavior and Relationship Consequences. Korean Management Review, 35(3), 961-981.
Kang, In-Won, Park, Chan-Wook, and Gu, Young-Mo (2008). A Study on the Adoption of e-Trade System as a Alternative Trade System. The Korean Association of Trade and Industry Studies, 13(2), 163-189.
Korea Institute for Animal Products Quality Evaluation (2012). Egg distribution and egg distribution Overview (pp.553-556). Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://www.ekapepia.com/mobile/distribution/ distributionView.do?menuId=nd34429.
Kim, Gyesu (2005). Virtural Internet Community Service and e-Value Creation: Using Structural Equation Modeling. Korean Management Review, 34(4), 1101-1123.
Kim, Yeung-Jo, Song, Sie-Yeoun, and Yeo, Jun-Sang (2009). The Effect of Regulatory Focus on Brand Name: The Role of Brand Sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10(1), 1-12.
Kim, Jang-Hyun, and Bae, Il-Hyun (2009). An Impact of Customer Service and Loyalty Program of Large Discount Store on Perceived Price and Satisfaction-Focused on Moderating Role of Monitering and Communication. Retail Information Systems Journal, 12(1), 5-27.
Kim, Koo-sung, Lee, Su-dong, and Kim, Ju-young (2004). The Effect of Trust toward Parent Firm on the Trust for its Internet Shopping Mall and on Purchase Intention-Comparison of experienced customers and non-experienced prospects. Market Research, 9(4), 85-114.
Lee, Hye-won, and Hwang, Ui-rok (2003). Private Brand's preference study on factors affecting consumer. Conference of Korea Distribution Association (pp.277-294). Seoul, Korea: Korea Distribution Association
Mägi, Anne W. and Claes-Robert Julander(2005), “Consumers' Store-Level Price Knowledge: Why are Some Consumers more Knowledgeable than Others?,” Jour of Retailing, 81(4), 319-329.
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. (2002). The Impact of Initial Consumer Trust on Intentions to Transact with a Web Site: A Trust Building Model. The Journal of Information Systems, 11(3/4), 297-323.
Pahu, I., and Poon, S.M. (2000). Factors Influencing the Types of Products and Services Purchased over the Internet. Internet Research, 10(2), 102-113.
Park, Kyung-Do, Park, Jin-Yong, and Jeon, Seung-Eun (2007). Successful Alliance Between Private and National Brands: The Moderating Effect of Price and Quality Sensitivity. Market Research, 12(4), 109-125.
Park, Yeung-Kurn, and Kim, Chang-Wan (2002). A Study Factors Affecting PB(Private Brand) Products Preference. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 9, 189-201.
Park, Jin-Yong, and Jung, Gang-Ok (2003). Regional Differentiation of Relationships between Private Brand Purchase Intention and Antecedents. Market Research, 8(2), 21-39.
Park, Jong-Chul, Hong, Sung-Jun, and Park, Myung-Jin (2008). The Effects of the Type of Private Brand`s Name on Perceived Quality: The Moderating Role of PBs` Knowledge and Trial. Korea Marketing Review, 23(4), 51-70.
Park, Jin-Yong (2004). A Study on Brand Alliance between Private Brand and National Brand. Market Research, 9(3), 49-68.
Shankar, V., Urban, G.L., and Sultan, F. (2002). Online Trust: A Stakeholder Perspective, Concepts, Implications and Future Directions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(December), 325-344.
Shin, Jong-Kuk, and Kong, Hye-Kyung (2005). The Effects of Store Image on Private Brand Image and Purchase Intentions-Comparison of National Distributors with Local Distributors in Pusan. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 115(2), 49-69.
Shin, Jong-chil (2004). A Study on the Effect of Service Provider, Service and Customer Characteristics on Relationship Benefits. Consumer Research, 15(3), 133-154.
Snoj, Boris, Korda, Aleksandra P., and Mumel, Damijan (2004). The Relationships among Perceived Quality, Perceived Risk and Perceived Product Value. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(2/3), 156-167.
Stewart, K. J.(2003). Transfer of Trust on the World Wide Web. Organization Science, 14(January-Feburary), 5-13.
Vahie, Archna, and Paswan, Audhesh (2006). Private Label Brand Image: Its Relationship with Store Image and National Brand. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(1), 67-84.
Vaidyanathan, R., and Aggarwal, P. (2000). Strategic Brand Alliance: Implications of Ingredient Branding for National and Private Label Brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(4), 214-228.
Wood, Stacy L., and Lynch, Jr. John G. (2002). Prior Knowledge and Complacency in New Product Learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(December), 416-426.