- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS
Analysis of the Car Industry Trade Structure between Korea and China
Analysis of the Car Industry Trade Structure between Korea and China
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
Abstract
Purpose - This study, in seeking to understand the trade structure of both Korea and China, aims to strengthen Korea-China economic cooperation; it examines trade impediments by analyzing the problems affecting trade and addressing these problems, thereby discovering ways to expand trade between these countries. Research Design, Data, and Methodology - The index of trade intensity developed by the trade intensity theory (Kruger, 1997) is used to analyze the trade decision factors of both countries. Although specific factors should have materialized from the analysis of trade decision factors, determining concrete explanations is difficult in reality, as there are many unsolved and diverse factors. Results - First, the index of A value/B value is the index of Korean versus Chinese market share/Korean versus world market share, which is a measure of comparative market intensity. Second, Korea has a comparative advantage in export specialization and, conversely, China has a comparative advantage in import specialization. Third, compared to 2000, the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) indexes are considerably improved. Conclusions - This study used quantitative measurement for analysis, applying trade intensity theory, trade specialization, and RCA indexes to gauge how inter-trade relations have changed between Korea and China during the past 10 years (2000, 2005, and 2012).
- keywords
- Car Industry, Intensity, Trade Structure, Trade Specialization, Revealed Comparative Advantage
참고문헌
Han, Sang-Yu l(2005), National Park Competitiveness Analysis by Revealed Comparativeness Advantage Index. Journal of Korea Forest Resort, 9(4), 53-59.
Jang, Min-Su (2008). Comparative Advantage for each Industries between Korea and Germany. Journal of Economy & Commerce, 26(3), 207-226
Jeong, U-Sik (2011). Chinese Agriculture International Competitiveness Assessment through Trade Specialization Index. Journal of Chinese Research, 52(0), 607-637.
Jeong, Je-Hwa (2012). FTA Effect Analysis by way of Trade Intensity Degree. Journal of Trade Information Research, 14(1), 141-163.
Kim, Seong-Jin (2009). Trade Intensity Degree Change Trend between Korea and Russia, 25(2), 1-32.
Kim, Seong-Jin, & Kim, Gi-Seong (2011). Trade Intensity Degree Change Trend between Korea and Major Asian Countries. Journal of Southeast Asia Research, 21(3), 245-287.
Kim, Heon-Cheol (2009), Modified Revealed Comparative Advantage Index and Acknowledgement for Local Strategic Industry. CSAM, 16(6), 903-913.
Kruger, A.O. (1997). Trade Policy and Economic Development: How we learn. American Economic Review, 87(1), 1-22.
Lee, Mu-Young (2010). International Competitiveness Status and its Enforcement Way for Korean Airplane Industry. Proceeding of Korea Airplane Management Association. 457-470.
Lall, Sanjaya, Manuel Albaladejo (2004). China’s competitive Performance : A treat to East Asian Manufactured Exports?. World Development, 32(9), 1441-1466.
Mizuno Junko (2010). A study on Korea against Japan trade deficit. Asia Economy Review, 45-59
WTO (2013). Trade to remain subdued in 2013 after sluggish growth in 2012 as European economies continue to struggle. Retrieved September 22, 2013, from http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres13_e/pr688_e.htm
Yu, Jun, & Han, Gi-Jo (2012). A Study on Trade Structure of Steel Industry between China and Japan. Journal of Economy & Commerce Association, 56(0), 111-127.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수