ISSN : 1738-3110
Purpose - The development and implementation of OSS (Open Source Software) led to a dramatic change in corporate IT infrastructure, from system server to smart phone, because the performance, reliability, and security functions of OSS are comparable to those of commercial software. Today, OSS has become an indispensable tool to cope with the competitive business environment and the constantly-evolving IT environment. However, the use of OSS is insufficient in small and medium-sized companies and software houses. This study examines the need for OSS Intermediaries in the Software Distribution Channel. It is expected that the role of the OSS Intermediary will be reduced with the improvement of the distribution process. The purpose of this research is to prove that OSS Intermediaries increase the efficiency of the software distribution market. Research design, Data, and Methodology - This study presents the analysis of data gathered online to determine the extent of the impact of the intermediaries on the OSS market. Data was collected using an online survey, conducted by building a personal search robot (web crawler). The survey period lasted 9 days during which a total of 233,021 data points were gathered from sourceforge.net and Apple's App store, the two most popular software intermediaries in the world. The data collected was analyzed using Google's Motion Chart. Results - The study found that, beginning 2006, the production of OSS in the Sourceforge.net increased rapidly across the board, but in the second half of 2009, it dropped sharply. There are many events that can explain this causality; however, we found an appropriate event to explain the effect. It was seen that during the same period of time, the monthly production of OSS in the App store was increasing quickly. The App store showed a contrasting trend to software production. Our follow-up analysis suggests that appropriate intermediaries like App store can enlarge the OSS market. The increase was caused by the appearance of B2C software intermediaries like App store. The results imply that OSS intermediaries can accelerate OSS software distribution, while development of a better online market is critical for corporate users. Conclusion - In this study, we analyzed 233,021 data points on the online software marketplace at Sourceforge.net. It indicates that OSS Intermediaries are needed in the software distribution market for its vitality. It is also critical that OSS intermediaries should satisfy certain qualifications to play a key role as market makers. This study has several interesting implications. One implication of this research is that the OSS intermediary should make an effort to create a complementary relationship between OSS and Proprietary Software. The second implication is that the OSS intermediary must possess a business model that shares the benefits with all the participants (developer, intermediary, and users).The third implication is that the intermediary provides an OSS of high quality like proprietary software with a high level of complexity. Thus, it is worthwhile to examine this study, which proves that the open source software intermediaries are essential in the software distribution channel.
Amor, J.J., Robles, G., Gonzalez-Barahona, J.M. and Pena, J.F. (2007), “Measuring Etch: the size of Debian 4.0”, from https://penta.debconf.org/~joerg/attachments/33-measuring_ etch_slides.pdf.
CIOBIZ (2010), A Research Paper on Open Source Inex, from http://www.ciobiz.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=3621.
Chun, M. K. (2002), Open source Software and Software Industry, Communications of the Korea Information Science Society, 20(12), 14-21.
Cnet News (2005), Week in review: March of the penguins, from http://news.cnet.com/Week-in-review-March-of-the-penguins /2100-1083_3-5829638.html.
Digital Times, (2006), 25% Adoption of Open Source Database, Office sofrware,from http://www.dt.co.kr/contents.htm?article_no= 2006062002010151600001.
GNU/Linux Distro Timeline(2011), Distribution Time Line Data, Septermber 2011, Retrieved from www.futuris.se/gldt.
Henkel, J. (2006), “Selective Revealing in Open Innovation Processes: the Case of Embedded Linux”, Research Policy, 35(7), 953-969.
Geeknet, Inc.(2012), SourceForge, from http://www.sourceforge.net.
Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L. and Beatty, S. E. (2002) “Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes”, Journal of Business Research, 55, 441-450.
Kim, H. W., Roh, S. E., Lee, H. R. and Kwak, K. Y., (2009), The Effect of Switching Costs on user Resistance in the Adoption of Open Source Software, Information System Reviews, 11(3), 125-146.
Ko, D. S. and Koo, B. K., (2012) Study on the Barrier of Introduction and Use of Open Source Software, Sustainable ICT Conference, 2012, 677-683.
Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry(2009), The Task agenda for enhancing IT industry's performance, 2009 Annual Research Reports, Seoul, South Korea, 1-33.
Kwon, M. J., Kim, T. W. and Kim, M. H. (2008), A Exploratory Study on Korean Open source Software and Barriers to vitalization of Open source software, Information Policy Research, 15(4), 3-21.
Lin, L. (2008). “Impact of User Skills and Network Effects on the Competition between Open Source and Proprietary Software”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 68-81.
Ministry of Information and Communication (2006). A Guide to Open Source Software, 2006 January.
Nam, I. K., Lee. J. D. and Kim, T. Y., (2006), A Case study of Enlarging Market for Activating Open Source Software, Communications of the Korea Information Science Society, 24(6), 18-23.
Open Source Initiative (2012), Definition of Opensouce, Retrieved September 30, 2012, from http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php.
Patrenko, M., Poshyvattyk, D., Rajlich, V., and Buchta, J. (2007), Teaching Software Evolutionin Open Source, IEEE Computer, November,25-29.
Wikipedia. (2012), Open Source Initiatives, November 2012, Retrieved from http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%98%A4%ED%94%88_%EC% 86%8C%EC%8A%A4_%EC%9D%B4%EB%8B%88%EC%85% 94%ED%8B%B0%EB%B8%8C.