ISSN : 1738-3110
Purpose - Studies of mechanism as a competitive strategy, a relatively new field in the study of strategic management research, has recently drawn the attention of the business management scholars. The literature has so far proposed the subjective-based view, environment-based view, and the resource-based view in its analyses of firm management. Hence, it is highly likely for the firm management to be reasonably thought of as a combination of and interaction among the three key elements of subject, environment, and resources this is the mechanism-based view (MBV). It is reasonable to consider firm management to be the combination of and interaction among the three key elements of subject, environment, and resources. The overall dynamic process that integrates these three elements and creates functional harmony is identified as the mechanism, the principle of firm management. Much of the extant literatures on MBV has mainly focused on case studies, a qualitative approach prone to subjectivity of the researcher, although the intuition from the study may lead to meaningful insights into a firm-specific mechanism. This study's focus is also on case analysis, but it still attempts a quantitative approach in order to reach a scientific and systematic understanding of the MBV. Research design, data, and methodology - I used both a qualitative and quantitative approach to a single model, given the complexity of the innovation processes. I conducted in-depth interviews with POSCO employees-20 from general management, two from human resources, eight from information technology, five from finance and accounting, and five from production and logistics management. Once the innovative events were selected, the interview results were double-checked by the interviewees themselves to ensure the accuracy of the answers recorded. Based on the interview, I then conducted statistical validation using the survey results as well. Results - This study analyzes the building process of innovation and the effect of the mechanism pattern on innovation by examining the case of POSCO, which has survived over the past 21 years. I apply a new analytical tool to study mechanism innovation types, perform a new classification, and describe the interrelationships among the mechanism factors. This process allows me to see how the "Subject"factor interacts with the other factors. I found that, in the innovation process of the adoption stage, Subject had a mediating effect but that the mediating effect of resource and performance was smaller than the effect of Subject on performance alone. During the implementation stage, the mediating effect of Subject increased. Conclusion - Therefore, I have confirmed that the subject utilizes resources reasonably and efficiently. I have also advanced mechanism studies: whereas the field's research methods have been largely confined to single case studies, I have used both qualitative and quantitative methods to examine the relationships among mechanisms.
Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D. & Barnett, W. P. (1993), "Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and Failure", Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 51-73.
Andrews, S. & Knoke, D. (1999), Research in the sociology of organization: Networks in and around organizations, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Barney, J. B. (2001), "Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research?", Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41-56.
Barney, J. B. (2002), Gaining and Sustaining Competitive advantage, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986), "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Cho, D. S. (2004), "The Review and Comparison of 4 Paradigms of Strategy: SBV, EBV, RBV, and MBV, Keynote paper", the Annual Meeting of the Academic Association for Organizational Science.
Cho, D. S. (2005), "Antithesis to Barney’s Definition of Resources", Mechanism Research Club in College of Business Administration, Seoul National University , working paper.
Cho, D. S. & Lee, D. H. (1998), "A New Paradigm in Strategy Theory: ‘Ser-M’", Monash Mt. Eliza Business Review, 1(2), 82-98.
Cho, D. S. & Jung, J. S. (2006), "A Firm's global Growth based on Mechanism-Based View: Balancing ·Coordinating · Learning Mechanism, Journal of Strategic Management, 9(1), 1-30.
Damanpour. F. & Schneider, M. (2006), "Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers", British Journal of Management, 17(1), 215-236.
Eisenhardt, K. & Martin, J. A. (2000), "Dynamic Capabilities: What are they?" Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
Holahan, P. J.,Aronson, Z. H., Jurkat, M. P. & Schoorman, F. D. (2004), "Implementing computer technology: a multi-organizational test of Klein and Sorra’s model", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1), 31-50.
Jarvenpa, S. L. & Staples, D. S.(2000), "The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants", Journal of Strategic Information System, 9(2), 129-154.
Klein, K. J. & Sorra, J. S.(1996), "The Challenge of Innovation Implementation", The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055-1080.
Klein, K. J. & Knight, A. P. (2005), "Innovation implementation", American Psychological Society, 14(5), 243-246.
Knight, K. A. (1967), "Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process", Journal of Business, 40(October), 478-496.
Kwon, T. H. & Zmud, R. W. (1987), Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation in Boland and Hirschheim, Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, New York, John Wiley.
Makadok, R. (2001), "Toward a synthesis of the Resources-Based and Dynamic-Capability vies of Rent Creation" Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 387-401.
Myer, A. D. & Goes, J. B. (1988), "Organizational Assimilation of Innovation: A Multiple Contextual Analysis" Academy of Management Journal, 31(8), 897-923.
Myers, Summer & Marquis, D. (1969), Successful Industrial innovation, Washington, D.C.: NSF 69-17.
Nonaka, I. (1989), Organizing Innovation as a Knowledge-Creation Process : A Suggested Paradigm for self-Renewing Organization, Center for Research in management, University of California, Berkeley.
Pearce, J. A. II, and Robinson, R. B. Jr. (1987), "The Tenuous Link between Formal Strategic Planning and Financial Performance", Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 658-675.
Roger, E.M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovation, New York : Free Press.
Singh, J., House, R. J. & Tucker D. J. (1986), "Organizational change and organizational morality", Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 587-611.
Sung, S.Y., Choi, J. N. & Cho. D. S. (2007), "The Examination of the Mechanism- based View", The Journal of Sustainable management, 2(1), 39-59.
Yin, R. K. (1984), Case Study Research : Design and Methods, Beverly hills: SAGE Publications.
Zahra, S. & Nielsen, A. P.(2002), "Sources of Capabilities, Integration and Technology Commercialization", Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 377-398.
Zollo, M. & Winter S. G, (2002), "Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities", Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.
Zollo, M. & Singh, H. (2004), "Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers", Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1233-1256.