Purpose - Foodservices have grown to over 60% of the franchise industry. However, despite reaching this high level, the foodservice franchise industry is experiencing severe ups and downs. While factors such as expansion by franchises and the entry of large multinational firms are causing this imbalance, the more serious problem faced by franchisees is the lack of know-how and correct operating procedures. Franchise headquarters should advise franchisees on important matters such as food ingredients, interior design, tableware, and fixtures. However, even though franchise headquarters have the ability to impart such management know-how, this is often a neglected area. Research design, data and methodology - This study was conducted in an industrial environment to present suitable competitive alternatives for foodservice franchises. Empirical analysis was conducted using a sample of 232 people with experience in targeting customers. The main purpose of this study is not to identify and analyze the factors affecting customer satisfaction. Customers of the Food Service Industry to invite contacts until departure for the service flow by identifying the expectations and allow this area by analyzing the resulting measures to enhance the competitiveness has presented. Results - Actual results contact factors affecting the quality of service on customer satisfaction was a significant influence. However, the end of this analysis, the actual customer satisfaction directly affects the quality of service that is only important factor can commit mistakes. Relatively large impact on customer satisfaction, which is relatively independent of the quality factor should be a review of zone of tolerance. In this study, eating phase relative to contact the service customer satisfaction was the most influential. The results, however, zone of tolerance for an area in the waiting and ordering dissatisfaction factors are appearing. And in the course of these services outside the zone of tolerance area is unsatisfactory evaluation is being done. Conclusions - After all, Foodservice, the contact service management for zone of tolerance the top priority should be can be seen. Foodservice contact first in the case of service quality factors caused by the continuous flow of services, so this step-by-step identification needs to be clearer. This, of course, to distinguish between the actual per unit of activity appears to be more difficult to follow, for it seems to need a lot of future complementary. Next is the assessment of customer service quality. Customers remember the experience for the services of a real contact through the assessment and service evaluation clearly emerge as the expected level can be difficult. However, this situation is controlled by the test method cannot be avoided unless there is no limit to the number of leave. Despite these limitations, the next step to contact a service evaluation and analysis have to continue to refine and thereby franchisees for the operation of the store in terms of practical know-how required to provide to the office believe.
Berry, L. L., Parasuraman, A., & Zeithaml, V. A.(1993). Ten Lessons for Improving Service Quality. Marketing Science Institute, Report No. 93-104.
Bitner, M, J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters:The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54(April), 69-82.
Bitner. M, J., Booms, B., & Tetreault, M. (1990). The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54(January), 71-84.
Bitner, M, J. (1992). Servicescape:The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56 (April), 57-71.
Bitner, M, J., Brown., Stephen and Matthew L. M. (2000).Technology Infusion in Service Encounter. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 138-149.
Chung Yong-Hae (2010). The effects of service Quality on Satisfaction by Service Encounter Group in Korean Super Deluxe Hotels'-F&B Outlets. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 22(5), 75-91.
Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing. 56, 55-68.
Getty, M. Juliet & Thompson, Kenneth N. (1995). The Relationship Between Quality, Satisfaction and Recommending Behavior in Lodging Decisions, Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing. 23, 3-22.
Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry (2008). Study on Status and Development of franchise. Seoul, Korea : GS1 Korea Publishing,
Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry (2010). Survey of franchise brands. Seoul, Korea : GS1 Korea Publishing,
Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry (2012). Distribution industry statistical compilations. Seoul, Korea : GS1 Korea Publishing,
Lee, Eun-JI, & Kang, Byung-Seo (2010). A Study on the effects of customer results and customer value on MOT service quality. in Proceedings of 2010 Korean Journal of Business Administration, 382-396.
Lee, Heung-Youn, Seo, Sang-Yun, & Lee, Jee-Hoon (2012). Study on the Development of Zone of Tolerance by Process Encounter for Medical Service Quality Control : Focusing on Small and Medium Hospitals. Health Service Management Review, 6(4), 37-47.
Shostack, L.G. (1997). Breaking Free From Product Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 41(April), 77-80.
Solomon,M., Surprenant,C., Czepiel,J., & Gutman, E. (1985). A role theory perspective on dyadic interactions:The service encounter. Journal of Marketing, 49(Winter), 99-111.
Wyckoff, D. D.(1984). New Tools for Achieving Service Quality. The Cornell H.R.A Quarterly, Nov. 78-91.
Yi, You-Jae (2008). Service Marketing. Seoul, Korea: Hakhyunsa Publishing,
Zeithaml V. A., & Bitner M. J.(1997). Service Marketing. New York, NY. : McGraw-Hill Press.
Zeithaml V. A., & Bitner M. J.(2007). Service Marketing. New York, NY. : McGraw-Hill Press.
Zeithaml V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Dwayne D (2009). Service Marketing, (5th ed). New York, NY. : McGraw-Hill Press.