바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Customer Participation Driven Sustainable Business Ecosystems

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.12, pp.83-92
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.12.201412.83
Joo, Jae-Hun
Shin, Matthew Min-Suk

Abstract

Purpose - A business ecosystem refers to mutually dependent systems interconnected by a loose foundation of various ecosystem members such as customers, suppliers, partners, and other stakeholders. The ecosystem-based strategy attempts to achieve competitive advantage for firms by enriching a business ecosystem or building a sustainable business ecosystem through the collaboration and co-evolution of its members. A sustainable business ecosystem is a source of competitiveness for firms anda manageable resource for gaining a competitive advantage. Customers represent the core membership of the business ecosystem and play a pivotal role in building a sustainable business ecosystem. This study examines the effects of customer participation on economic and social value in the business ecosystem and suggests a course of action for building a sustainable business ecosystem. Research design, data, and methodology - Two business cases of South Korea are selected from two different business types: business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-customer (B2C) firms. Business ecosystems for B2B and B2C firms reflect contrasting characteristics. Data was collected from in-depth interviews with four representatives of four firms. Results - The study suggested seven propositions for the relationships between customer participation and a sustainable business ecosystem through multiple case studies based on in-depth interviews. The results reveal the following four strategic actions for building sustainable business ecosystems based on the suggested propositions: alignment, systemization, socialization, and co-evolution. Alignment refers to achieving a harmonic balance or virtuous circle among the firm's mission, investment, and value creation. Systemization refers to building and implementing management and infrastructure systems rooted in the corporate culture. Socialization of customers in the business ecosystem reinforces the harmony or virtuous cycle. Finally, co-evolution is associated with the relationship between firms and customers as buyer firms in a restricted business ecosystem. Conclusions - This study considers multiple cases for the execution of a sustainable business ecosystem in collaboration with customers and suggests seven propositions and four strategic actions. The results are based on qualitative data from interviews with business associates from two firms in an open business ecosystem and two firms in a restricted business ecosystem, both in South Korea. Our research results regarding two contrasting business ecosystems shed light on business issues and policy making in Asian business environments, which are in the transition stages from a traditional conglomerate-driven to an inclusive growth-driven economy. The business ecosystem itself should be considered a manageable resource for firms' competitive positions in the market. A customer is a member of the business ecosystem and should thus be viewed not only as a purchasing entity and an object of relationship management but also as a co-creator of value. Therefore, firms should collaborate with customers to build sustainable business ecosystems. For this, firms must create social value, which cannot be created by customers alone, within the business ecosystem. Then, customers participate in a business ecosystem and build it to be favorable to them. Implications for academics and practitioners were suggested.

keywords
Business Ecosystems, Customer Participation, Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Capital

Reference

1.

Adler, P. S., & Kwon, E. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.

2.

Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369-386.

3.

Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. (2003). Psychological Implications of Customer Participation in Co-Production. Journal of Marketing, 67, 14-28.

4.

Berthon, P., Pitt, L., & Campbell, C. (2008). When Customers Create The Ad. California Management Review, 50(4), 6-30.

5.

Bowen, D. E. (1986). Managing Customers as Human Resources in Service Organizations. Human resource Management, 25(3), 371-383.

6.

Chao, G. T., O'Lerary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational Socialization: Its Content and Consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 730-743.

7.

Chesbrough, H., Kim, S., & Agogino, A. (2014). Chez Panisse:Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem. California Management Review, 56(4): 144-171.

8.

Cousins, P. D., Handfield, R. B., Lawson, B., & Petersen, K. J. (2006). "Creating Supply Chain Relational Capital: The Impact of Formal and Informal Socialization Processes. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 851-863.

9.

Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design - Choosing Among Five Traditions, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.

10.

Cusumano, M., (2010). Technology and Management: The Evolution of Platform Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 32-34.

11.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

12.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building From Cases : Opportunities and Challenges. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.

13.

Eisenhardt, K. M., “Better stories and better constructs : The case for rigor and comparative logic”, Academy of Management Review, 16(3), (1991), 620~627.

14.

Fang, E. (2008). Customer Participation and the Trade-Off Between New Product Innovativeness and Speed to Market. Journal of Marketing, 72, 90-104.

15.

Fragidis, G., Tarabanis, K., & Koumpis, A. (2007). Conceptual and Business Models for Customer-Centric Business Ecosystems. Inaugural IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, 94-99.

16.

Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. (2012). Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Proceedings of DRUID 2012, CBS, Copenhagen, Denmark.

17.

Govender, K. K. (1998). Managing Service Quality by Managing the Service Encounter: The Effects of Organizational Socialization Strategies. University of Cape Town.

18.

Heslin, P. A., & Ochoa, J. D. (2008). Understanding and Developing Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 125-144.

19.

Iansiti, M. (2009). Principles that Matter: Sustaining Software Innovation from the Client to the Web. HBS Working paper 09-142, 1-23.

20.

Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2002). The New Operational Dynamics of Business Ecosystems: Implications for Policy, Operations, and Technology Strategy. Harvard Business School Working Papers, 03-030, 1-115.

21.

Karhu, K., Tang, T., & Hamalainen, M. (2014). Analyzing Competitive and Collaborative Differences among Mobile Ecosystems Using Abstracted Strategy Networks. Telematics and Informatics, 31(2), 319–333.

22.

Kelley, S. W., Donnelly, J. H., & Skinner, S. J. (1990). Customer Participation in Service Production and Delivery. Journal of Retailing, 66(3), 315-335.

23.

Lee, Don-Gon, & Lee, Myung-Jin. (2014). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Image and Corporate Performance, Journal of Distribution Science, 12(9), 101-112.

24.

Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and Sense Making: What Newcomers Experience in Enterprising Unfamiliar Organizational Settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-248.

25.

Lovelock, C. H., & Young, R. F. (1979). Look to Consumers to Increase Productivity. Harvard Business Review, 57, 168-178.

26.

Markus, M. L. & Loebbecke, C. (2013). Commoditized Digital Processes and Business Community Platforms: New Opportunities and Challenges for Digital Business Strategies. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 649-653.

27.

Mills, P. K., & Morris, J. H. (1986). Clients as 'Partial'Employees of Service Organizations: Role Development in Client Participation. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 726-735.

28.

Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review (June), 75-86.

29.

Moore, J. F. (1996). Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the age of Business Ecosystems, New York:HarperCollins Publishers.

30.

Muegge, S. (2011). Business Ecosystems as Institutions of Participation: A Systems Perspective on Community-Developed Platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review (November), 4-13.

31.

Namasivayam, K. (2003). The Consumer as ‘Transient Employee’ Consumer Satisfaction Through the Lens of Job-Performance Models. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(4), 420-435.

32.

Nettekoven, K. (2008). Integrating The Consumer Into The Corporate Ecosystem. British Telecommunications White Paper.

33.

Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1993). "From Value Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 65-77.

34.

Park, Jong-Chul, Mool, Prashant, Na, June-Hee, & Lee, Chang-Gon. (2014). The Effects of Creating Shared Value on Corporate Performance, Journal of Distribution Science, 12(10), 29-35.

35.

Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the Co-creation of Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83-96.

36.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.

37.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.

38.

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting Customer Competence. Harvard Business Review, 78, 79-87.

39.

Priem, R. L., Butler, J., & Li, S. (2013). Toward Reimaging Strategy Research: Retrospection and Prospection on the 2011 AMR Decade Award Article. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 471–489.

40.

Robinson, S. R., Irmak, C., & Jayachandran, S. (2012). Choice of Cause in Cause-Related Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 126-139.

41.

Rong, K., Hu, G., Lin, Y., Shi, Y., & Guo, L. (2014). Understanding Business Ecosystem Using a 6C Framework in Internet-of-Things-based Sectors. International Journal of Production Economics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.003

42.

Rothschild, M. 1990. Bionomics: Economy as Ecosystem. New York, Henry Holt and Company.

43.

Schein, E. H. (1968). Organizational Socialization and the Profession of Management. Industrial Management Review, 9, 1-16.

44.

Sen, S., & Cowley, J. (2013). “The Relevance of Stakeholder Theory and Dcial Cital Teory in the Cntext of CSR in SMEs: An Australian Pespective. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 413-427.

45.

Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52, 58-74.

46.

Wind, J., & Rangaswamy, A. (2001). Customerization: The Next Revolution in Mass Customization. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(1), 13-32.

47.

Wnuk, K., Runeson, P., Lantz, M., & Weijden, O. (2014). Bridges and Barriers to Hardware-Dependent Software Ecosystem Participation – A Case Study. Information and Software Technology, 56(11), 1493–1507.

48.

Yin, R. (1994). Case study research : Design and methods(2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publishing.

The Journal of Distribution Science