- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS
The Effect of Three Different Generation Types on Prosocial Consumption Behavior
The Effect of Three Different Generation Types on Prosocial Consumption Behavior
Hwnag, Yoon-Yong (Division of Business Administration, Chosun University)
Quan, Zhi Xuan (Department of Alternative Medicine, Kwangju Women's University)
Jung, Jin-Chul (Division of Business Administration, Chosun University)
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
Abstract
Purpose - This study aims to examine differences in donation behavior as surrogates of prosocial consumption behavior among three generation types. Further, it attempts to examine the moderator roles that affect donation behavior influenced by the difference in generations. Research design, data, and methodology - This study used the statistical ANOVA technique to examine generational difference. Surveys were structured differently by ages, as 20th, 30th, 40th, 50th, 60th, and 70th to classify generations into each group. A survey to measure the psychological distance was performed to identify whether the respondents intended to donate to a domestic or overseas target. Results - First, subjective judgment of psychological distance has no effect on objective donation behavior. Second, though the result of the relationship with moral identity is not statistically significant, it provides evidence that a higher moral identity level possesses more donation behavior. Further, groups with higher symbolization tend to donate more than the others. This was especially evident among the young and baby boomer generation. Conclusion - This empirical study suggests that marketers need to differentiate the market segment of the baby-boomer generation with high purchasing power of prosocial consumption.
- keywords
- Baby-Boomer, Moral Identity, Psychological Distance, Prosocial Behavior
참고문헌
Adbel-Ghany, M., and Sharpe, D. L. (1997). Consumption Patterns Among the Young-Old and Old-Old. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 31(1), 90-112.
Aquino, K., and Reed , Ⅱ A. (2002). The Self-Importance of Moral Identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440.
Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed Ⅱ, A., Lim, V. K., and Felps, W. (2009). Testing a Social Cognitive Model Behavior:The Interactive Influence of Situations and Moral Identity Centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123-141.
Aquino, K., McFerran, B., and Laven, M. (2011). Moral Identity and the Experience of Moral Elevation in Response to Acts of Uncommon Goodeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 703-718.
Belk, R., Devinney, T. M., and Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer Ethics Across Cultures, Consumption. Markets and Culture, 8(3), 275-289.
De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., andRayp, G. (2005). Do Consumers Care About Ethics: Willings to Pay for Fair-Trade Coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39, 363-385.
Doran, D. J. (2009). The Role of Personal Values in Fair Trade Consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 549-563.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gibelman, M. (1999). The search for identity: Defining social work-past, present, future. Social Work, 44(4), 137-151.
Hardy, S. A, and Carlo, G. (2005). Identity As A Source of Moral Motivation. Human Development, 48, 232-256.
Hoffman, M. L.(1970). Moral Development. In P. Mussen (Ed.). Handbook of Child Psychology, 261-361. New York, NY:John Wiley.
Isaacowitz, D. M., Wadlinger,H. A., Goren, D., and Wilson, H. R. (2006). Is There an Age-Related Positivity Effect in Visual Attention?, A Comparison of Two Methodologies. Emotion, 6(3), 511-516.
Jeong, Hyuk-jin (2006). New Business Opportunities, Catch strong Senior. LG Business Insight.
Jeong, Jeong-ho, and Kim, Mi-hee (2008). A Study of Lapsed Donors` Characteristics and Giving Behavior. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 37(summer), 241-266.
Jones, B., and Rachlin, H. (2006). Social Discounting. Psychological Science, 17(4), 283-286.
Kang, Hyoung-goo, and Jun, Sang-gyung (2011). Empirical Analysis of Korean Corporate Giving: Past and Present. The Review of Business History, 60, 209-228.
Kim, Young-Ho (2009). Smart Senior Market, Who will be preempted. Seoul, Korea: Daehong Communications.
Kirmani, A. (1990). The Effect of Perceived Advertising Costs on Brand Perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(September), 160-171.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). The Child as a Moral Philosopher. Psychology Today, 2(September), 25-30.
Koschate-Fischer, N., Stefan, I. V., and Hoyer, W. D. (2012). Willing to Pay for Cause-Related Marketing: The Impact of Donation Amount and Moderating Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 910-927.
Lee, Jeong-ki, and Jeong, Jeong-eun (2011). An Exploratory Research on the Intention toward Donation of the Twenties: Focusing on the Viewing Hours of TV Program Genres, Values and the Variables of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Media, Gender & Culture, 20, 173-204.
Mael, F., and Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their Alma Matter: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
Markus, H. R., and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and Self:Implication for Cognitions, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
Meiners, N. H., and Seeberger, B. (2010). Marketing to Senior Citizens: Challenges and Opportunities. The Journal of Social and Political Affairs, 35(3). 293-329.
Morales, A. C. (2005). Giving firms an 'E' for Effort: Consumer Responses to High Effort Firms. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 806-812.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone.
Reed Ⅱ, A., and Aquino, K. (2003). Moral Identity and the Expanding Circle of Moral Regard toward Out-Group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(June), 1270-1286.
Reed Ⅱ, A., Aquino, K., and Levy, E. (2007). Moral Identity and Judgments of Charitable Behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71(January), 178-193.
Reynolds S. J., and Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The Effects of Moral Judgment and Moral Identity on Moral Behavior: An Empirical Examination of the Moral Individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610-1624.
Sherman, E., Schiffman, L. G., and Dillon, W. R. (1988). Age/gender Judgments and Quality of Life Difference. In J. Shapiro Stanley and A. H. Walle (Eds), Marketing: A return to the broader dimensions, 319-320, Chicago, IL:American Marketing Association.
Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.
Trope, Y., and Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.
Van Slyke, D. M., and Brooks, A. C.(2005). Why Do People Give? : New Evidence and Strategies for Nonprofit Managers. The American Review of Public Administration, 35: 199-222.
Verhaert, G. A., and Dirk Van den, Poel (2011). Empathy as Added Value in Predicting Donation Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1288-1295.
Winterich, K. P., Vikas, M., and Ross JR, W. T. (2009). Donation Behavior toward In-Groups and Out-Groups:The Role of Gender and Moral Identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(August), 199-214.
Winterich, K. P., Zhang, Y., and Mittal, V. (2012). How Political Identity and Charity Positioning Increase Donation:Insights from Moral Foundation Theory. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(December), 346-354.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수