바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Public Service Good Health Advertising: Effects of Elaboration Likelihood and Construal Level on Consumer Attitudes

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.6, pp.67-79
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.6.201406.67
Park, Jong-Chul
Kim, Kyung-Jin
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to accomplish three major research goals. First, it strives to change consumers' focus from peripheral routes to a central route of public service advertising related to the good health policy, without problematic effects, by influencing consumers' knowledge or involvement. Second, this study examines the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) and construal level theory (CLT). Specifically, we consider that the central route of ELM might correspond with the focal goal of CLT. Third, this study analyzes ELM through CLT. That is, ELM predicted that low involvement would take the peripheral route, and high involvement would take the central route. Research design, data, and methodology - This study consisted of three experiments. The first experiment had a 2×2 between-subject design. The subjects were university students and the research period was approximately one year. The first independent variable was the involvement of the overweight issue; this variable was measured and split by the median. The second independent variable was the temporal distance (near vs. distant future); this variable was manipulated. The second experiment also had a 2×2 between-subject design. The first variable was the involvement of cervical adenocarcinoma prevention, and was considered already manipulated by sex. Specifically, males had a low involvement of the disease, but females had high involvement. The second independent variable was priming (power vs. submissive). Power priming would induce abstract thinking, but submissive priming would take concrete processing. The third experiment had a 2×2×2 between-subject design. The first variable was cognitive depletion, and was manipulated by memorizing 9-digit numbers. The second and third independent variables were involvement and abstract thinking induction, such as prior experiments. Data were collected through questionnaires, and were analyzed by an SPSS program. Major hypotheses were tested by examining the interaction effects through ANOVA. Results - Major findings are as follows. First, even for low-involved consumers in the overweight category, distant future manipulation induced them to focus not on the peripheral route but on the central route of the public service advertisement. This result does not correspond to the typical ELM prediction. Second, under power priming, low-involved males of the cervical adenocarcinoma category focused on the peripheral route because of the induction to abstract thinking. This result replicated the first experiment, and confirmed the theoretical robustness. Third, high-involved females focused not on the central but on the peripheral route under the mixed condition of cognitive depletion and near future manipulation. Depletion consumed cognitive resources, and the processing mode of consumers changed from systematic to heuristic. Conclusions - ELM needs to be complemented through CLT in context of public service good health advertising. Specifically, the involvement of ELM may impact consumers' thinking mode (abstract vs. concrete), and the interaction effects may influence consumers' focus on advertising (central vs. peripheral route). This study's limitations were bounded subjects, limited stimuli, and somewhat weak external validity.

keywords
Elaboration Likelihood Model, Construal Level Theory, Public Service Advertisement, Good Health, Cognitive Depletion

Reference

1.

Amit, Eleanor, Algom, Daniel, Trope Yacov, & Liberman, Nira (2008). Thou Shalt Not Make Unto Thee Any Graven Image: The Distance-Dependence of Representation. in The Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation (ed). Keith Markman, Bill Klein, and Julie Suhr, New York: Psychology Press.

2.

Bae, Hyuhn-Suhck (2006). A Prediction Model for the Effects of Emotion and Issue Involvement on Entertainment-Education Viewers' Intention to Register as Cornea Donors. Korean Association Broadcasting & Telecommunication Studies, 62(1), 273-301.

3.

Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1998). The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(1), 210-224.

4.

Cho, Jae-Hyun (2001). The Effects of Message Quality and Quantity on Internet Banner Ads. Advertising Research, 53(1), 213-228.

5.

Dehaene, Stanislas (2003). The Neural Basis of the Weber-Fechner Law: A Logarithmic Mental Number Line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(April), 145-147.

6.

Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Trope, Y. (2004). The Influence of Abstract and Concrete Mindsets on Anticipating and Guiding Others’ Self-Regulatory Efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739–752.

7.

Friestad, Marian, & Wright, Peter (1994). The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attemps. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-10.

8.

Fujita, Kentaro, Henderson, Marlone D., & Eng, Juliana (2006). Spatial Distance and Mental Construal of Social Events. Journal of the American Psychological Society, 17(4), 278-282.

9.

Fujita, Kentaro, Trope, Yaacov, Liberman, Nira, & Levin-Sagi, Maya (2006). Construal Levels and Self-Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(March), 351-67.

10.

Ganzach, Y., Weber, Y., & Or, P. (1997). Massage Framing and Buying Behavior: On the Difference between Artificial and Natural Environment. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 91-95.

11.

Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Steidley, T. (1998). Personality and Ad Effectiveness: Exploring the Utility of Need for Cognition. Advanced in Consumer Research, 15(1), 209-212.

12.

Holbert, R. L., Hmielowski, J., Jain, P., Lather, J., & Morey, A. (2011). Adding Nuance to the Study of Political Humor Effects: Experimental Research on Juvenalian Satire versus Horatian Satire. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(3), 187-211.

13.

Hwang, Hee-Joong, & Shin, Seung-Ho (2012). Impact of a Brand Image Matching with the Advertising Model on Price Fairness Perceptions: Focus on Sports Advertising. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(3), 43-50.

14.

Kim, Jung-Hyun (2005). The Effects of Public Campaigns from the Perspective of Persuasion Knowledge Model. Advertising Research, 67(Spring), 9-32.

15.

Kim, Kyeongheui, Zhang, Meng, & Li, Xiuping (2008). Effects of Temporal and Social Distance on Consumer Evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(December), 706-713.

16.

Kim, Sanghoon, & Ahn, Daechun (2008). Problems Involved in the Use of ‘Big Models’ in Advertising and Possible Solutions: A Survey with Korean Advertisers. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 55-74.

17.

Kim, Sung-Duck, Youn, Myoung-Kil, & Kim, Ki-Soo (2012). A Study of the Effect of Model Characteristics on Purchasing intentions and Brand Attitudes. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(4), 47-53.

18.

Kim, Tae-Sung, & Kim, Pan-Jin (2010). A Study on the P.O.P Response for the Buying Trends of General Supermarket. Journal of Distribution Science, 8(1), 35-42.

19.

Lee, Jung Gyo (2006). The Effect of Celebrity-Product Mismatch on Advertising Memory: Role of the Level of Mismatch. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 7(4), 169-192.

20.

Lee, Kyung Yul, & Kim, Sanghoon (2011). Measuring Online Users' Experience of Blog and It's Effects on Web Equity of Internet Portal. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 22(1), 57-79.

21.

Lee, Sun Ro, Cho, Jung Hyun, & Cho, Sung Min (2007). A Study on the Impacts of Users' Needs for Cognition(NFC) on the Online Brand Community and Brand Loyalty. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 17(4), 1-29.

22.

Liberman, Nira, & Trope, Yaacov (1998). The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18.

23.

Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256-1269.

24.

McQuail, D. (2005). Mass Communication Theory. London, UK.:Sage.

25.

Meyvis, Tom, Goldsmith, Kelly, & Dhar, Ravi (2008). Beyond Survival of the Fittest: The Influence of Mindsets on Consumers Response to Brand Extensions. Paper presented at the Association for Consumer Research North American Conference, Orlando, Florida.

26.

Moore, J., & Rodgers, S. (2005). An Examination of Advertising Credibility and Skepticism in Five Different Media using the Persuasion Knowledge Model. America Academy of Advertising, 5(January), 10-18.

27.

Park, Jaejin (2011). The Fundamental Attribution Error in Attitude Attributions of Advertising Models. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 22(4), 115-136.

28.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Experimental Social Psychology, 19(1), 132-205.

29.

Petty, R. E., & Cacciopop, J. T. (1983). Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: Application to Advertising. Advertising and Consumer Psychology, 10(1), 3-23.

30.

Petty, R. E., & Cacciopop, J. T. (1984). The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69-81.

31.

Petty, R. E., Brinol, P., & Priester J. R. (2009). Mass Media Attitude Change: Implications of the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. New York: Routledge.

32.

Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roles for Affect under High- and Low-Elaboration Conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 5-20.

33.

Redden, Joseph P. (2008). Reducing Satiation: The Role of Categorization Level. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(February), 624-634.

34.

Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You Focus on the Forest When You’'re in Charge of the Trees: Power Priming and Abstract Information Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578–596.

35.

Trope, Yaacov, & Liberman, Nira (2000). Temporal Construal and Time-Dependent Changes in Preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 876-889.

36.

Trope, Yaacov, & Liberman, Nira (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.

37.

Um, Nam Hyun (2011). Creative Characteristics of Celebrity Endorsement in Korea and U.S. Magazine Advertisements. The Social Science Studies of Kookmin University, 23(1), 215-237.

38.

Wakslak, Cheryl J., Trope, Yaacov, Liberman, Nira, & Alony, Rotem (2006). Seeing the Forest When Entry is Unlikely: Probability and the Mental Representation of Events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 641-653.

39.

Yang, Yoon, & Lee, Hye Jin (1998). The Effect of Response Mode, Prior Knowledge, and Need for Cognition on Consumers‘ Information Acquisition Processes. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 85-103.

40.

Yang, Yoon, & Cho, Soo Wan (2009). The Influences of Negative Affect and Processing Styles on Inference: The Differential Impact of Anger and Sadness. The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 10(2), 299-319.

41.

Yoon, Sang Hyun (2000). Study on the Internet Advertising Effects according to Involvement. Seoul, Korea: Master’s Thesis of Yonsei University Graduate School.

42.

Yu, Hyun Jae (2010). Cultere or Position? Cross-cultural and Cross-positional Comparisons of the Opinions about Creative Advertisements: The Case of the U.S. and Korea. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 12(4), 126-161.

43.

Zauberman, Gal, Kim, K. B., & Malkoc, Selin A. (2009). Discounting Time and Time Discounting: Subjective Time Perception and Intertemporal Preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 543-556.

The Journal of Distribution Science