바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Evaluation of the Research Potential in the Aeronautics Transport Mode in Europe

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.9, pp.25-38
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.9.201409.25
Mesko, Maja
Hanzic, Katja
Stiglic, Mitja
Bozicnik, Stane
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Our study aims to analyze and assess aeronautics transport, to bring comprehensive insight about the existing potential in the new member states, candidate countries, potential candidate countries, and associated states. Methodology - The evaluation was carried out by applying qualitative methodology to the research results and on existing capabilities, to assess the overall research capability in the aeronautics transport mode of each country and region, in the European context. Results - Overall, countries with the strongest potential are the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, and Romania. The aeronautics research potential was evaluated as weak in as many as 11 countries, with Estonia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania, and Moldova being evaluated as weak in all categories, and Latvia, Croatia, and Serbia being evaluated as weak overall but having at least one category evaluated as medium. Conclusion - Based on the research findings, there are recommendations regarding both the research policy and research activities related to the aeronautics transport mode. The findings contribute to the further development of EU aeronautics research and the aviation industry.

keywords
Aeronautics, Transport, Central And Eastern European Countries, Qualitative Research

Reference

1.

Acare(2010). Aeronautics and air transport: beyond vision 2020. Acare Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Acare. Retrieved September 10, 2013, from http://www.acare4europe.com/about-acare

2.

Aeronautics research (2006). 2006 Annual Reports: 2003 –2006 projects. Retrieved September 14, 2013, from http://www.gppq.mctes.pt/brochuras/online/AAT%20FP6%20-%20vol_1.pdf

3.

Barnhart, C., Fearing, D., Odoni, A., & Vaze, V. (2012). Demand and capacity management in air transportation. Euro Journal of Transportation and Logistic, 1(1), 135-155.

4.

Bonnefoy, P. A., and Hansman, R. J.(2005). Emergence of Secondary Airports and Dynamics of Regional Airport Systems in the United States. Report No . ICAT-2005-02, MIT International Center for Air Transportation

5.

Clean Sky JTI. (2011). Clean Sky JTI Report. Retrieved September 17, 2013, from www.cleansky.eu

6.

Eurocontrol (2011). Medium-Term Forecast. Retrieved September 11, 2013, from http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor/gallery/content/public/forecasts/Doc442-MT-Flights-Sep11-v1.0.pdf

7.

Kim, Chang-Gon, & Youn, Myoung-Kil (2013). An empirical study on yard inventory change according to containers’ dwell times. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(5), 33-41.

8.

Single European Sky (2011). Sky ATM Research. Retrieved September 17, 2013, from http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air/sesar/sesar_en.htm

9.

Youn, Myoung-Kil, & Seol, Sung-Soo (1999). A study on Logistics and Home delivery service for Electronic Commerce in Korea. Journal of Distribution Science, 1(1), 25-38.

10.

Wensveen, G. J. (2011). Air transportation: a management perspective (7th ed). Furnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

The Journal of Distribution Science