바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Portfolio Decision Model based on the Strategic Adjustment Capacity: A Bionic Perspective on Bird Predation and Firm Competition

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.1, pp.7-18
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.1.201501.7
Mao, Chao
Chen, Shou
Liu, Duan
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This study integrates a corporate competition system with a bird predation system to examine how organizational strategic adjustment capacity influences firm performance. By proving the prominent effects on performance, a financial vector is constructed to represent corporate strategic adjustment results, and an operation capacity vector is constructed, which can be categorized as a parameter for locating birds. All these works help us to propose a new method of investment, the portfolio decision model based on the strategic adjustment capacity. Research design, data, and methodology - Strategic adjustment capacity can be decomposed into three aspects: the organizational learning capacity from the top firms, the extent to which firms maintainor rely on the best operational capacity vector in history, and the ability to eliminate the disadvantages or retain the advantages of the operation capacity vector from the previous year. The method of solving cyclic equations is designed to evaluate strategic adjustment. Firms manufacturing specialized equipment are chosen to test the effects of the strategic adjustment capacity on three aspects of firm performance. Results - There is a positive correlation between the capacity to learn from the best firms and performance improvement. The relationship between the dependence or maintenance of a firm's advantages and performance improvement is a U-shape curve, and there is no significant effect of inertial control on performance improvement. Conclusions - A firm's competition system is a sophisticated adaptation, and competitive advantage and performance can be investigated based on the principles of competition in nature.

keywords
Bird Predation, Operation Capability, Performance Improvement, Strategic Adjustment, Portfolio Decision Model

Reference

1.

Aït - Sahalia, Y., & Brandt, M. W. (2001). Variable selection for portfolio choice. The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1297-1351.

2.

Anghel, M. G. (2013). Model of Portfolios Analysis. Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, 61(4), 39-43.

3.

Brockmand, B., and Morgan, F. (2003).The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance. Decision Sciences, 32, 385-419.

4.

Casey, A. (1997). Collective memory in organizations. In P. Shrivastava, A. Huff, & J. Dutton (Series Ed.) & A. Huff & J. P. Walsh (Vol. Ed.), Advances in strategic management(Vol. 14), Organizational learning and strategic management (pp. 111–146). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

5.

Christine, M., & Miner, A. S. (1998).Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 698-723.

6.

Daniel, J., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64, 408-417.

7.

Darroch, J., & McNaughton, R. (2003). Beyond market orientation:knowledge management and the innovativeness of New Zealand firms. European Journal of Marketing, 37, 572-593.

8.

DeGeus, A. P. (1988). Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review, 66, 70-74.

9.

Deloof, M. (2003). Does working capital management affect profitability of Belgian firms?. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 30, 573-588.

10.

Frederic, P. M., Vandome, A. F., & McBrewster, J. (2010). Complex adaptive system, Beau Bassin: VDM Publishing House.

11.

Goold, M. (1996). Design, learning and planning: a further observation on the design school debate, California Management Review, 38, 94 – 95.

12.

Huang, H. H., & Wang, C. P. (2013). Portfolio selection and portfolio frontier with background risk. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 26, 177-196.

13.

Jovan, G., &Miller, D. J. (2009). Competitive advantage and performance:The impact of value creation and costliness of imitation. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1192-1212.

14.

Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. C. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia: IEEE Service Center, 1942-1948.

15.

Lin, S. J., & Lee, J. R. (2011). Configuring a corporate venturing portfolio to create growth value: Within-portfolio diversity and strategic linkage. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 489-503.

16.

Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The journal of finance, 7(1), 77-91.

17.

Mary, M. C., & Berdrow, I. (2003). Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1087-1105.

18.

Michael, J. T., & Sohi, R. S. (2003).IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 745-761.

19.

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari:A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York: Free Press.

20.

Pascale, R. T. (1996). The Honda effect. California Management Review, 38, 80-91.

21.

Perold, A. F. (1984). Large-scale portfolio optimization. Management science, 30(10), 1143-1160.

22.

Raheman, A., and Nasr, M. (2007). Working capital management and profitability - Case of Pakistani firms. International Review of Business Research Papers, 3, 279-300.

23.

Sharpe, W. F. (1963). A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Management science, 9(2), 277-293.

24.

Sinkula, J. M. (1994).Market information processing and organizational learning. Journal of Marketing, 58, 35-45.

25.

Tanaka, H., Guo, P., & Türksen, I. B. (2000). Portfolio selection based on fuzzy probabilities and possibility distributions. Fuzzy sets and systems, 111(3), 387-397.

26.

Ussahawanitchakit, P. (2008). Impacts of organizational learning on innovation orientation and firm efficiency: An empirical assessment of accounting firms in Thailand. International Journal of Business Research, 8, 1-12.

The Journal of Distribution Science