바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effect of Audience Attitude toward Product Placement on Product Attitude and Purchase Intention

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.1, pp.71-81
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.1.201501.71
Chae, Se-Ra
Han, Woong-Hee
Kim, Geon-Ha
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to examine the effect of audience attitude toward product placement, or PPL, on product attitude and purchase intention. PPL has increasingly been prevailing in TV dramas since the revision of the Broadcasting Act in January 2010, and it is quite widespread in today's society. Therefore, this study intends to investigate how the audience would take a particular attitude toward PPL in TV dramas and how their attitude would affect their product attitude and purchase intention. Research design, data, and methodology - The sample for the current study was drawn from college students in Seoul in December 2013, as the main targets of the products and brands that were advertised by PPL are young people. The questionnaire for this study comprised nine parts, such as the knowledge of PPL, experience of PPL, TV drama watching time, impulsive buying propensity, celebrity imitating buying propensity, attitude toward PPL, attitude toward product, purchase intention, and demographic characteristics. The questionnaire items were measured by 5-point Likert scales. Whether the demographic characteristics and propensity to consume would affect PPL attitude was analyzed and how the PPL attitude would affect purchase intention through product attitude was analyzed as well. To analyze the relationship between variables, structural equation modeling analysis was performed with Amos 18.0. Results - The major findings of the study were as follows. First, whether the demographic characteristics and propensity to consume would affect PPL attitude was analyzed, and it is found that out of the demographic characteristics, only gender and knowledge of PPL exerted an influence on PPL attitude. In addition, celebrity-imitating buying propensity had an impact on PPL attitude. Second, whether PPL attitude would affect purchase intention through product attitude was analyzed by structural equation modeling. Consequently, it is found that PPL attitude impacted purchase intention through product attitude. Conclusions - The findings of the study had the following implications. First, in theoretical aspects, previous studies have proven only that attitude toward PPL influenced attitude toward product and purchase intention separately; however, the current study has investigated the mediated role of attitudes toward PPL. Second, regarding the practical aspects, as PPL attitude exercised an effect on purchase intention as well as product attitude, PPL should be utilized in a manner to stimulate the audience to take a positive attitude to it. Finally, gender, PPL knowledge, and celebrity-imitating buying orientation were identified as influential factors for PPL attitude. Specifically, female consumers showed a lower attitude toward PPL than males, and the consumers who have no knowledge showed a lower attitude toward PPL. The consumers who have celebrity imitating buying propensity expressed a higher attitude toward PPL. These factors should consequently be taken into account when PPL is planned and conducted. The current study has limitations such as the sample object, non- experimental method, and media biases. Therefore, future research should be conducted to address these limitations.

keywords
PPL, Product Attitude, Purchase Intention

Reference

1.

Bandura, A. (1977). Vicarious Process : A Case of No-trial Learning. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 1-55.

2.

Choi, Na Young (2012). Appearance Management Activities of Female High School Students Through Star-Entertainer Imitation : School Uniform Modification, Hair style, and Makeup. Korean Home Economics Education Association. 24(3). 175-189.

3.

de Gregorio, F., and Sung, Y. (2010). Understanding Attitudes toward and Behaviors in Response to Product Placement: A Consumer Socialization Framework. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 83-96.

4.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesly, ARRB Group Limited.

5.

Gupta, P. B., Balasubramanian, S. K., & Klassen, M. L.(2000). Viewers' Evaluations of Product Placements in Movies:Public Policy Issues and Managerial Implications. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 22(2), 41-52.

6.

Gupta, P. B., & Gould, S. (1997). Consumer's Perceptions of the Ethics and Acceptability of Product Placement in Movies: Product Category and Individual Differences, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 19(1), 37-50.

7.

Karrh J. A., Frith K. T., & Callison, C. (2001). Audience Attitudes towards Brand(Product) Placement: Singapore and the United States. International Journal of Advertising, 20, 3-24.

8.

Kim, Bong Hyun (2005). A Study of Perception of Consumers to Product Placement(PPl) in Television programs. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 16(2), 233-261.

9.

Kim, Byeong-Ok, & Park, Kyu-Won (2005). A Study on PPL(Product Placement) as a Video Advertisement Technique. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 11(3), 18-27.

10.

Kim, Dong-Hyek (2009). A Study on Indirect Advertisement(PPL)in The Media. Journal of Communication Design, 31, 38-47.

11.

Kim, Jin-Ok, & Jeon, Jung-Ok (2009), An Exploratory Research for the Scale Development of Imitative Buying Tendency. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 10(4), 663-682.

12.

Kim, Sang Hoon (2001). A study on the attitude and operation methods toward indirect TV advertising. The Korean Journal of Advertising 12(3). 7-29.

13.

Kim, Yong-Min, Kireyeva, Anel A., & Youn, Myoung-Kil (2014). Effects of SNS Characteristics upon Consumers’Awareness, Purchase Intention, and Recommendation. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 5(1). 27-37.

14.

Lee, Ha-Na, Chang, Byeng-Hee, Lee, Sun-Hee, Goo, Hi-Hae, & Lee, Yang-Hwan (2011). The Effects of TV and Advertisements Viewing Motivations on the Intentions to Use and Avoid TV Product Placement. Korean Journal of Advertising. 13(3). 143-176.

15.

Lee, Ki-Hyun (2011). Drama Product Placement(PPL) and Storytelling: 'Secret Garden' Case Study. KOCCA Focus, 2011(4). 1-12.

16.

Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941), Social Learning and Imitation. New Haven, CT, US: Yale University Press.

17.

Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3). 318-332.

18.

Nam, Kyoung-Tae (2010). A Study of Factors Related with Consumers' Attitudes toward BPL (brand placement) in Television Drama. Korean Society For Journalism And Communication Studies, 54(3). 228-254.

19.

Nevenzahl, I. D., & Secunda, E. (1993). Consumers Attitudes toward Product Placement in Movies. International Journal of Advertising, 12, 1-11.

20.

Oh, Mi-Young (2011). A Study on Psychological Reactance to Product Placement in TV drama. Korean Society For Journalism And Communication Studies. 55(6), 384-409.

21.

Park, Jae-Jin (2006). A Study of factors Affecting the effectiveness of Product Placement – An Intention-based Approach. Advertising Research. 71, 153-175.

22.

Yang, Moon-Hee (2013). A Study of the Relationship between Attitude toward PPL and Audience Personality. Journal of Media Economics & Culture. 11(3). 7-45.

The Journal of Distribution Science