바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

How a Luxury Brand Can Enhance its Product Attractiveness in Retail Environment?

How a Luxury Brand Can Enhance its Product Attractiveness in Retail Environment?

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.12, pp.5-11
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.12.201512.5
Ahn, Sungsook (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jeonghoon (Department of Business Administration, Hoseo University)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this research is to investigate the influence of social status perception and interest in social issues on the authenticity perceived by consumers of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities of premium brands. Research design, data, and methodology - Behavioral experiments were performed to observe the impact of consumers' social status perception and interest in social issues on their perceived authenticity of CSR motivation related to premium brands and consumer behavior. Results - We found that the possibility of social mobility and the degree of individuals' interest in the environment and CSR enable them to reconsider the authenticity of CSR motivation, thereby having positive effects on purchase intention, willingness to recommend the product, and brand value. This research also showed that proactive customers who seek to move up the social ladder have a stronger interest in social issues such as the environment or CSR. Conclusions - Our research suggests that when conducting a consumer segmentation analysis for the launch of CSR products (products released for CSR), a positive mind-set toward social mobility serves as an effective criterion.

keywords
Perceived Authenticity, CSR Motivation, CSR Interest, Social Mobility, Product Attractiveness

참고문헌

1.

Bae, B. R. (2007). Amos 21 structural equation modeling. Seoul, Korea: Cheonglam.

2.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

3.

Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. J. (2010). The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers’ purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 838-856.

4.

Chen, J., Chiu, C. Y., & Chan, S. F. (2009). The cultural effects of job mobility and the belief in a fixed world: evidence from performance forecast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 851.

5.

De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers’prevention focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 887.

6.

Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2003). Who trusts?: The origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies, 5(2), 93-137.

7.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

8.

Goodman, E., Adler, N. E., Kawachi, I., Frazier, A. L., Huang, B., & Colditz, G. A. (2001). Adolescents' perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108(2), 1-8.

9.

Graham, C., Chattopadhyay, S., & Picon, M. (2010). Adapting to adversity: happiness and the 2009 economic crisis in the United States. Social Research, 77(2), 715-748.

10.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

11.

Herbst, K. C., Finkel, E. J., Allan, D., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2012). On the dangers of pulling a fast one:Advertisement disclaimer speed, brand trust, and purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 909-919.

12.

Kim, M. S., Kim, D. T., & Kim, J. I. (2014). CSR for sustainable development: CSR beneficiary positioning and impression management motivation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(1), 14-27.

13.

Lakshman, C., Ramaswami, A., Alas, R., Kabongo, J. F., & Pandian, J. R. (2014). Ethics trumps culture? A cross-national study of business leader responsibility for downsizing and CSR perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 101-119.

14.

Lenski, G. E. (1954). Status crystallization: a non-vertical dimension of social status. American Sociological Review, 19(4), 405-413.

15.

Li, Y., Savage, M., & Warde, A. (2008). Social mobility and social capital in contemporary Britain. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(3), 391-411.

16.

Liedtka, J. (2008). Strategy making and the search for authenticity. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 237-248.

17.

Malik, M. (2014). Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 419-438.

18.

Mazereeuw-van der Duijn Schouten, C., Graafland, J., & Kaptein, M. (2014). Religiosity, CSR attitudes, and CSR behavior: An empirical study of executives’ religiosity and CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 437-459.

19.

McShane, L., & Cunningham, P. (2012). To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgments of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 81-100.

20.

Oishi, S., & Graham, J. (2010). Social ecology lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 356-377.

21.

Osberg, L., & Smeeding, T. (2006). "Fair" inequality? Attitudes toward pay differentials: the United States in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 450-473.

22.

Plewa, C., Conduit, J., Quester, P. G., & Johnson, C. (2015). The Impact of corporate volunteering on CSR image: A consumer perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 643-659.

23.

Putrevu, S., & Lord, K. R. (1994). Comparative and noncomparative advertising: attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 77-91.

24.

Schuhwerk, M. E., & Lefkoff-Hagius, R. (1995). Green or non-green? Does type of appeal matter when advertising a green product?. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 45-54.

25.

Tewari, R., & Pathak, T. (2014). Sustainable CSR for micro, small and medium enterprises. Journal of Management and Public Policy, 6(1), 34.

26.

Thompson, C. J., Rindfleisch, A., & Arsel, Z. (2006). Emotional branding and the strategic value of the doppelgänger brand image. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 50-64.

27.

Van de Gaer, D., Schokkaert, E., & Martinez, M. (2001). Three meanings of intergenerational mobility. Economica, 68(272), 519-538.

28.

Van Knippenberg, B., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 25.

29.

Wang, Y., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women's luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 834-854.

30.

Wegener, B. (1991). Job mobility and social ties: Social resources, prior job, and status attainment. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 60-71.

31.

Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377-390.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)