바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

A Study on CSV of Social Economy and Consumer Perspective

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.12, pp.53-63
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.12.201512.53
Lee, Young-Il
Kim, Young-Shin

Abstract

Purpose - Recently, creating shared value (CSV) has attracted attention through plan sustainability and the growth of corporate management. Porter and Kramer (2011) defined the core concept of CSV as social value, economic profits, improvements in the economic social condition, and reinforcing competitiveness. The purpose of CSV, which is to pursue economic profits through a social solution to the problem, agrees with managing the objective of a social enterprise that prioritizes the pursuit of profits through the realization of a social purpose. Today, CSV studies focus on CSR and sustainability and reinforce competitiveness. However, few studies focused on the social economy. Precedent studies examined CSV using a company example, and few studies exist from the perspective of consumers and the point of view of a market society. Research design, data, and methodology - Therefore, this study examines CSV in comparison to a background of the social economy. This study also investigates and analyzes the concept of social value from the point of view of consumers, social problems, consumption value, corporate value, and the influence of consumers. This article develops three hypotheses. Hypothesis 1 investigates the correlation with social innovation that consumers thought as being necessary for social innovation by a company. Hypothesis 2 is used to confirm the influence of consumers in CSV. Therefore, this article investigates the influence of consumers on consumption action for companies that are indifferent to social problems. Hypothesis 3 is used to verify the correlation between the value that consumers demand through consumption and the corporate value that companies pursue other than profits. The three hypotheses were adopted and met the standard for suitability. Results - The importance of the CSV study from the consumer perspective was confirmed using the influence of consumers on CSV. Because the objective of company activities is either the consumer or the market, the influence that extends to interactions between the company and consumers to ensure the success of a business is significant. Regarding the CSV study, because it was an initial study, various approaches are subsequently developed. However, conceptual and practical case studies on CSV currently exist that may be used to verify the factors that comprise CSV. Therefore, the company example may enable verification of the factors that influence the composition of CSV through identification from the consumer perspective. In addition, studying CSV as an action result (of consumer satisfaction, of a company's profits and competitiveness, and of society's cancellation of a social problem) may enable the realization of a practice paradigm as opposed to simply thought and faith. Conclusions - First, this study confirms the social value of a business through the feasible and common pursuit of consumers by corporations. Second, customer influence accounts for an important part of CSV. Third, shared value commonly provides a necessary advantage to consumers, corporates, and society, and contributes to the economy and healthy social development. Fourth, corporates can conduct a business, generate profits, and realize value through improvements in social problems and by addressing their competitive strengths and weaknesses.

keywords
CSV(Creating Shared Value), Social Economy, Social Value, Corporate Value, Consumer Perspective

Reference

1.

Bruyn, S. T. (1977). The Social Economy: People Transforming Modern Business. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication.

2.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48

3.

Cheon, Hye-Jung, Kim, Si-Wuel, Lee, Dong-Il, & Lee, Ji-Hyun (2014). Creating Shared Value: Redefining the Role of the Corporation & Consumer. Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(3), 1-19.

4.

Cho, Dong-Sung (2012). Economic Democratization in Capitalism 5.0. The Journal of Professional Management, 15(3), 23-47.

5.

Choi, Da-Woon, Kim, Kyung-Bok, & Lee, Sang-Myun (2015). Impacts of the Creating Shared Value’s Motivation &Performance on the Stakeholders. Korean Corporation Management Review, 22(2), 153-174.

6.

Choi, Jo-Soon (2013). Study on the institutional isomorphism of job creating policy in local community. Civil Society &NGO, 11(1), 3-32.

7.

Chun, Kyung-Hee, Hong, Yeon-Geum, Yoon, Myung-Ae, & Song, In-Sook (2010). Good Consumption Ethical Consumption. Seoul, Korea: Sigmapress.

8.

Clark, Duncan, & Unterberger, Ruth (2007), The Rough Guide to Shopping with a Conscience, New York & London:Rough Guides.

9.

CMP(Conflict Management Toolkit) (2011). Conflict Management Program of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS-CM). Retrieved May 22 2014, from http://www.sais-jhu.edu/cmtoolkit/approaches/conflict-preven tion/indicators-signs.htm

10.

Defourny, Jacques (1990). L’économie sociale en Wallonie: sources et identité d’un troisième gr& secteur. In V.A. (Ed.), Les Régions et l'Europe (IXe Congrès des Economistes Belges de Langue Française et Conseil Wallon de l'Economie Sociale (pp. 155-180), Charleroi, Belgique:CIFOP.

11.

Defourny, Jacques (1992). Economie Sociale, Entre économie capitaliste et économie publique. De Boeck.

12.

Driver, Michaela (2012). An Interview With Michael Porter: Social Entrepreneurship & the Transformation of Capitalism. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 421-431.

13.

Dunoyer, Charles (1830). Treatise on Social Economy. In Clary, B. J., Dolfsma, W., & Figart, D. M. (2006). Ethics & the Market (pp.112-125), London & New York: Routledge.

14.

European Commission (1998). Commission Decision of 13 March 1998 setting up a consultative committee for cooperatives, mutual societies, associations & foundations. Retrieved 22 May 2014, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ SL/ALL/?uri=CELEX:31998D0215

15.

Fallon, Valére, S. J. (1934). Principles of Social Economy. New York, NY: Benziger Brothers.

16.

Fontan, Jean-Marc, & Shragge, Eric (2000). Tendencies, Tensions & Visions in the Social Economy. In Eric Shragge & Jean-Marc Fontan (ed.), Social Economy:International Debates & Perspectives (pp.1-15), Montreal:Black Rose Books.

17.

Gates, Bill (2007). Remarks of Bill Gates, Havard Commencement 2007, Retrieved Jun 7, 2007. from http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2007/06/remarks-ofbill-gates-harvard-commencement-2007/

18.

Han, Sang-Il (2010). Social Enterprise & Community Development. Creativity & Innovation, 3(1), 223-246.

19.

Harrison, R., Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2006). The Ethical Consumer. London: Sage Publication.

20.

Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis & research. London: Routledge.

21.

Hong, Yeon-Kum, & Song, In-Suk (2010). A Case Study of Ethical Consumer in Korea. Journal of Consumption Culture, 13(2), 1-25.

22.

Hong, Yeon-Kum, & Song, In-Sook (2008). A study of cases of ethical consumption in the analysis of purchasing motives of environmentally-friendly agriculture products. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(3), 23-42.

23.

Hosouchi, Nobutaka (2001). Community Business. Tokyo Japan, Chuo-u University Press.

24.

Huh, Eun-Jeong, & Kim, Woo-Sung (2012). Consumer’s Ethical Consumption Behavior & related factors. Journal of Consumer Studies, 23(4), 105-128.

25.

ICA (International Co-operative Alliance)(1995). What is a co-operative?. Retrieved Jun 7, 2007. from http://ica.coop/en/what-co-operative

26.

Jang, Dae-Chul (2010). The concept of the social enterprise &strategic meaning. KEF Compensation Quarterly, 18(3), 84-96.

27.

Jang, Wo-Jin (2011). Administration present situation of the social economy & current events point. Proceedings of the Spring Conference of The Korean Association for public Administration, Seoul, Korea: The Korean Association for public Administration, 1-22.

28.

Jang, Won-Bong (2006). A meaning & Issues of Social economy. Urbanity & Poverty, 80, 92-115.

29.

Jang, Won-Bong (2007). Alternative conceptualization of Social economy. Civil Society & NGO, 5(20), 11-43.

30.

Jeong, Tae-In, & Lee, Su-Yeon (2013). Cooperative Economic. Seoul, Korea: Redian.

31.

Ji, Kyu-Ok (2015). Cooperative Movement as a Community Welfare Practice Model. Social Welfare Policy, 42(1), 187-210.

32.

Jung, Young-Ho, & Ko, Sook-Ja (2015). Social Conflict Index &Economic Growth : Evidence from a Cross-section of 7Countries. Health·Welfare Policy forum, 3, 44-55.

33.

Kang, Nae-Young (2012). Concept comparison between social innovation, social company, appearance & advanced country of the social economy. Urban affairs, 47(527), 14-18.

34.

Kerlin, J. (2007). Social Enterprise: at the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies & civil society. London & New York;Routledge.

35.

Kim, Sung-Soo (2009). A Study on the History of Theoretical Changes of Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR). Korean Corporation Management Review, 29, 1-25.

36.

Kim, Yu-Kyung (2015). Study on Relationship Between Consumption Values of Masstige & Consumer Happiness. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(1), 105-118.

37.

Koo, Hye-Gyoung, & Rha, Jong-youn (2009). The Concept of Consumer- Business Collaboration: its Potential & its Limitations shown by Critical Review of Consumer participation Marketing Cases in Korea. Journal of Consumer Studies, 20(3), 99-133.

38.

Koo, Hye-Gyoung, & Rha, Jong-youn (2012). The Conceptualization & the Practical Application of Consumer-Business Co-creation of Value. Journal of Consumer Studies, 23(1), 193-227.

39.

Lee, Ja-Sung (2010). Inhabitants participation & community business for management of the Japanese local community. Proceedings of the Summer Conference of The Korean Association for public Administration, 1468-1486.

40.

Lee, Jong-Woon, & Ree, Sang-Bok (2007). Business Ethics Evaluation Model for the Improvement of Enterprise Value. Journal of the Korean society for Quality Management, 35(20), 53-63.

41.

Lee, Youn-Chul (2015). CSV management by the creative evolution of CSR. Dong-A Business Review, 186(1). 111-113.

42.

Lim, Chae-Won, & Kim, Byong-Seob (2012). Shared Value Growth & the Relational State Model as a Response to the Global Financial Crisis in 2008. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 50(3), 295-326.

43.

Lim, Hyung-Seob, & Kim, Kye-Uk (2012). Activation strategy of the Gwangju social economy for creation of the job. Focus Gwangju, 22, 4-27.

44.

Ministry of Health, & Welfare (2010). Self-support business guidance guideline.

45.

Moulaert, F., & Ailenei, O. (2005). Social Economy. Third Sector & Solidarity Relations: A Conceptual Synthesis from History to Present. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2037-2053.

46.

Nam, Seung-Yeon, & Lee, Young-Bum (2008). A Study on the Typology & Future Directions of Social Enterprises in Korea: Focusing on Work Integration Social Enterprises. The Social Science Researches, 34(3), 29-60.

47.

Park, Sung-Soo (1990). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geistes des Kapitalismus. Moonye Publishing Co., Ltd.

48.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-69.

49.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage & corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.

50.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value:How to Reinvent Capitalism-& Unleash a Wave of Innovation & Growth, Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 63-70.

51.

Rha, Jong-Youn (2004). Consumer Education through Experiential Learning: Developing Social Responsibility &Soft Skills as Consumer Professionals. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 22(2), 59-67.

52.

Rhee, Seung-Kyu, & Rha, June-Young (2010). Measuring the Sociosconomic Value of Social Enterprises : social Return on Investment Revisited. The Korean Venture management review, 13(3), 41-56.

53.

Rha, June-Young (2010). Business Models for Social Enterprises. The Korean Venture Management Review, 13(4), 129-161.

54.

Rha, Jong-Youn, Kim, Hakkyun, Kim, Hackjin, Lee, Yuri, & Lee, Jin-Myong (2014). Suggestions for Research in an Era of Creating Shared Value. Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(3), 141-162.

55.

Rokeach, M. L. (1973). The nature of human values. New York:Free Press.

56.

Samsung Economics Research Institute(SERI) (2009). Social Conflict & Economic Cost in Korea. CEO Information, 710.

57.

Schultz, Henry (1937). Reviewed Works: Etudes d'économie sociale(Théorie de la répartition de la richesse sociale);Etudes d'économie politique appliquée (Théorie de la production de la richesse sociale) by Leon Walras, G. Ledue, Journal of Political Economy, 45(5), 701-702.

58.

Seth, J. N., Newman, B. J. & Gross, B. I. (1991). Why we buy what we Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159-170.

59.

Shin, Myoung-Ho (2009). Social Enterprise & Social Economy. Urbanity & Poverty, 80, 5-45.

60.

SIPRI(Stockholm International Peace Research Institute)(1998). Peace, Security & Conflict Prevention, Oxford University Press.

61.

The Wallon Social Economy Council (1990). Conseil Wallon de l’Economie Sociale (CWES, 1990): Rapport à l’Exécutif Régional Wallon sur le secteur de l’Economie Socialé, Liege.

62.

Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). A Review & a Conceptual Framework of Prestige-seeking Consumer Behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, 1-15.

63.

Walras, Léon, & Rouge, F. (1896). Études d'économie sociale:Théorie de la répartition de la richesse sociale. In Schultz, Henry (1937), by Etudes d'économie politique appliquée : Théorie de la production de la richesse sociale by Leon Walras, Journal of Political Economy, 45(5), 701-702.

64.

Weber, Max (1990). Translated by Park, Sung-Soo. Die protestantische Ethik und der Geistes des Kapitalismus, Moonye Publishing Co., Ltd.

The Journal of Distribution Science