바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Capacity of Distribution Science and the Energy Distribution Role for Visegrád Group Cooperation

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.12, pp.95-103
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.12.201512.95
Seo, Daesung

Abstract

Purpose - The Visegrád Group cooperation of the past 14 years and that of V4 for the past 20 years has very important significance in the 21st century that must be maintained. This cooperation is valuable because of the trade routes that connect northern Poland to the Balkans in southern Croatia, which forman important basis for the resuscitation of Central European development. Currently, because of the European manufacturing base and industrial development, an energy supply and stable energy distribution networks have been introduced to secure cooperation and not competition within the Visegrád Group. This paper's research emphasizes the supply chain hub in neighboring countries. Although Central and Eastern European countries are small, they can provide a competitive response to Western Europe if they collaborate with the V4 group and other countries. Research design, data, and methodology - The subjects of this study in the Visegrád Group area are related to the development of Marketing and Distribution Sciences in the integrated European Union. In relation to the existing energy infrastructure, construction companies and financial institutions benefit from large-scale construction projects. Existing or new infrastructure facilities among the V4 must comply with the preconditions of regional energy markets. The network of emerging markets is changing into a European-logistics hub of new markets. This hub is closely associated with the economic development of European self-sustainment given that energy for distribution and consumption is imported from Russia. Therefore, this paper indirectly provides data on the regional distribution of energy as alternative bases in Europe for market expansion to Asia. Results - As a result, it appeared unlikely that V4 failed to implement homogeneity following the standards of Western Europe, as proposed by the EU. Throughout European history, individuals have gathered in Central Europe as an innovation hub. Currently, the region is being established independently for energy industrial development and not for tourism development, and is expected to play a central role in innovation and distribution consumption. Therefore, similar to Western and Northern Europe, V4 only appears to engage in distribution consumption on the basis of the identity that it formed for itself. This area is expected to either create a regional platform or a voice over a single economic policy. Conclusions - To this end, regarding the distribution of consumer groups within and outside the region, the V4 group is expected to be established for various policy areas and as a Eurasian outpost of trade and distribution logistics. In addition, given its purpose of engaging in the distribution of energy cooperation and trade clusters, the Visegrád Group will be in charge of the center axis of the bridge for distribution logistics trading partners from the Western Balkans to Caucasus and Eastern Europe. Thus, the Visegrád Group is entering this region as a platform for market share by enabling all or any investor can gain greater industrial benefits.

keywords
Visegrad Group, Consumping Market, Trade-Cluster, Distribution-Science, Energy Supply-Chain

Reference

1.

Éltetö, A., & Völgyi, K. (2013). Integrated in the global value chains - trade developments between Hungary and Asia. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 4(1), 57-79.

2.

European Commission (2014). Infrastructure-TEN-T-Connecting Europe What do we want to achieve?. Mobility and Transport, Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved May 2, 2014 from http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/infrastructure/index_en.htm.

3.

Eurostat (2009). Energy, transport and environmental indicators, Eurostat pocketbook, 2009 edition. Retrieved March 30, 2015 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3930297/5963662/K S-DK-09-001-EN.PDF/2ad80871-2cb9-4784-b781-f15351636352.

4.

Eurostat (2014). Key figures on the enlargement countries 2013edition, Eurostat poketbook. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 33-34.

5.

Eurostat (2015). Statistical Pocketbook 2015. Retrieved March 26, 2015 from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/statistics/energy-statistical-pocketbook.

6.

Gazprom (2012). Delivery statistics, Gas supplies to Europe. Retrieved March 26, 2015 from http://www.gazpromexport.ru/en/statistics.

7.

Gyarfasova, Olga, & Meseznikov, Grigorij. (2011). Visegrad Elections 2010. Bratislava: IVF press.

8.

IEA (2008). Energy and CO2 emissions scenarios of Poland, Paris 2010. The figures refer to the baseline scenario. Retrieved March 30, 2015 from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/etp2008.pdf.

9.

International Visegrad Fund (2015). official website, Annual report of the V4 Presidency. Retrieved March 26, 2015 from http://visegradfund.org/?download=downloads/media/annual _reports /ivf_Visegrad-Fund15.pdf.

10.

International Visegrad Fund (2013). EU Integration Issues-Visegrad Countries and the South. Caucasian Institute for Economic and Social Research press.

11.

International Visegrad Fund (2011). Two Decades of visegrad cooperation. Bratislava: IVF press.

12.

International Visegrad Fund (2006). Visegrad Group – Central European Constellation. Warsaw : Adam Mickiewicz Institute press.

13.

Kałan, D. (2013). East of Centre: Can the Visegrad Group Speak with One Voice on Eastern Policy?. PISM, policy paper, No. 5 (53), February 2013.

14.

Kovács, K. (2013). US Screening and Evaluation system of Inventions Utilized in Hungary. Budapest Management Review, 44(10), 24-36.

15.

Losoncz, M. (2011). Continuity and Discontinuity in the Interaction of Regional and Corporate Cultures: Potsdam (Germany) and Győr (Hungary), European Planning Studies 1995-2008, 19(11).

16.

Mo, L., & Zhai, S. (2012). The Effects of County-of-Origin, BrandImage, and Corporate Image Dimensions on Brand Evaluations and Purchase Intentions of Smart Phones of Five Brands: A Comparative Study of China and Korea. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(7), 47-56.

17.

Nosko, Andrej., Orbán, Anita., Paczyński, Wojciech., Černoch, Filip., & Jaroš, Jakub. (2010). Visegrad Security Cooperation Initiative: Energy security, Central Europe-Energy, Policy briefs. Brussel: CEPI press

18.

OECD (2013). OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (database). Retrieved December 26, 2014 from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx ?DataSet Code=EO93_INTERNET.

19.

OECD (2015). Export data-countries, economic indicators. Retrieved Noverber 1, 2015 from http://www.theglobaleconomy.com/indicators_data_export.php.

20.

Seo, Daesung (2014). The Expansion Strategy for New Route between Korea-Hungary. Journal of Distribution Science. 12(6), 59-65.

21.

Seo, Daesung (2015). Central Eastern Europe’s Pattern of Industrial Development and Regional Structure in Market Distribution. Journal of Distribution Science. 13(6), 17-23.

22.

Sadecki, Andrzej (2013). The prospects for Croatia's co-operation with the Visegrad Group. OSW Commentary, 116(1), 12-23.

23.

SzakálnéKanó, I., & Vas, Z. (2013). Spatial Distribution of Knowledge-Intensive Industries in Hungary. Transition Studies Review, 19 (4), 431-444.

The Journal of Distribution Science