- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS, ESCI
스마트워크 품질이 집단지성 및 직무만족에 미치는 영향
The Effect of Smart Work Quality on Collective Intelligence and Job Satisfaction
김오우 (Dep. of Business Administration, Dongguk University)
Abstract
Purpose - As the rapid development of ICT has been made recently, many domestic companies are trying to introduce smart work infrastructure. The purpose of institution of smart work is to enhance their performance. To this end, it is necessary to advance the way of working. Developing employees' collective intelligence should be regarded as a prerequisite for advancing the way of working. Job satisfaction of the employees is another important factor to enhance organizational performance. So this study aims to provide the theoretical background of systematic approach to smart work quality by empirically analyzing the effect of smart work quality on collective intelligence and job satisfaction. Research design, data, and methodology - A structural equation model was designed to examine cause-and-effect relationships among three latent variables(smart work quality, collective intelligence, job satisfaction). Three hypotheses were formulated. The first hypothesis is that the effect of smart work quality on collective intelligence will be positively and statistically significant. Likewise, the second hypothesis is that the effect of smart work quality on job satisfaction will be positively and statistically significant. Finally, the third hypothesis is that the effect of collective intelligence on job satisfaction will be positively and statistically significant. Based on the previous researches, 34 questionnaire items were developed to measure the effect of the three variables. The survey was conducted on 162 employees who are working under smart work environment. The number of the effective questionnaires for the analysis was 154. PASW Statistics 18 and AMOS 18 were used for the statistical analysis. Results - The validity and reliability test for questionnaire items have been carried out. From the factor analysis, 1 out of 34 items was eliminated. As a result, 33 out of 34 items were used for analyzing. The values of Cronbach's α ranged from 0.701 to 0.910, indicating the acceptable reliability of the questionnaire items. The values of χ2, df, CFI, TLI, RMSEA of the model are 102.838, 51, 0.949, 0.935, 0.082, respectively. So the structural equation model was statistically significant. The first and third hypotheses were supported. But the second hypothesis was rejected. Conclusions - An analysis using structural equation model showed meaningful implications about the effect of smart work quality on collective intelligence and job satisfaction. First, as the five quality elements of the smart work improved, the level of collective intelligence increased. Second, the statistical analysis showed smart work didn't have a direct effect on job satisfaction, which is inconsistent with the prior findings. The main purpose of smart work is to help achieve greater performance. The companies also need to make efforts to improve job satisfaction of their employees along with achieving greater performance. Third, an organization with higher level of collective intelligence showed greater job satisfaction. The companies under smart work environment need to develop functions to encourage participation, sharing, openness, and collaboration. This research will provide useful information for the companies which want to introduce smart work, distribution information system, management information system, etc.
- keywords
- Smart Work, Collective Intelligence, Job Satisfaction, Distribution Industry, Distribution Information System
참고문헌
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Testing Structural Equation Models. CA:Sage.
Choo, Shi-Gak, Sohn, Young-Kon, & Jeon, Sang-Gil (2012). Policy Implications for the Smart Work Diffusion:Focusing on the Perceptual Differences on Organizational Effectiveness between Smart Workers and Office Workers. The journal of digital policy & management, 10(4), 11-22.
Cho, Sang-Eun (2011). A Study on the Influence of the Customer Orientation and Job Satisfaction as a Result of the Consultant's Emotional Exhaustion at the Call Center. Asan, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Hoseo University.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
Doosan Encyclopedia (2015). Collective Intelligence. Seoul, Korea: Doopedia. Retrieved April 7, 2015, from http://www.doopedia.co.kr/doopedia/master/master.do?_method=view&MAS_IDX=101013000933341.
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper.
Jung, Chul-Ho, & Mun, Young-Ju (2011). Current Status and Challenges for the Activation of Smart Work: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Korea Electronic Commerce Research Association, 12(2), 53-69.
Kaliski, B. S. (2007). Encyclopedia of Business and Finance(2nd ed.). Detroit: MI, Thompson Gale.
Kang, Yong-Sik (2014). A Study on the Influencing Factors of Smart Work Performance. Cheongju, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Chungbuk National University.
Kim, Dong-Ho, & Youn, Myoung-Kil (2012). Present and Future of the Journal of Distribution Science. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(5), 9-17.
Kim, Woo-Taek (2011). Effects of the Quality of Smart Work on the Job-Performance in the Public Sector. Gyeongsan, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Yeungnam University.
Korean Psychological Association (2014). Job Satisfaction. Seoul, Korea: KPA. Retrieved April 9, 2015, from http://www.koreanpsychology.or.kr/psychology/glossary. asp?Ikeyword=&lng=kor&sort1=ㅈ&sort2=ㅊ&Ipage=110.
Ko, Tae-Kyung (2012). A Study on the determining factor of the smart work performance. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Master's in Hansung University.
Leadbeater, C. (2008). We-think: The power of mass creativity. London: Profil Books.
Lee, Seung-Hee, Do, Hyeon-Ok, & Seo, Kyeong-Do (2011). A Study on Management Plans for Activating of Smart Work. The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 9(4), 245-252.
Lee, Yu-Na, & Lee, Sang-Soo (2009). Conceptual Design Principles of Collective Intelligence. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 213-239.
Levy, P. (1994). Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace. Perseus Books Group.
Lim, Kyu-Kwan (2011). A Study on Smart Work 2.0Implementation Methodology. The journal of digital policy & management, 9(4), 235-244.
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Ministry of Administration and Safety (2010, July). The Promotion Plan of the Smart Work.
Namn, Su-Hyeon, Noh, Kyoo-Sung, & Kim, Yu-Kyung (2011). Models for Determining the Levels of Smart Work. The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 9(4), 191-200.
National Information Society Agency (2010, November). Smartwork Insight. The Mega Innovative Change of the Way of Working 'Smart Work'.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psycometric Theory(2nd ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill.
Oh, Dong-Seob (2011). Smart Work. Seoul, Korea: Jinhan Press.
Oh, Won-Chul (2003). Industrial & Organizational Psychology. Seoul, Korea: SungKyunKwan University Press.
Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 157-164.
Park, Kyung-Hye (2011). A Study of the Strategy on Smart Work. The Society of Digital Policy & Management, 9(4), 213-222.
Park, Ye-Ree, Lee, Jung-Hoon, & Lee, Young-Joo (2014). A Study on Job Satisfaction of Smart Work Worker and Smart Work Continued Usage. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 19(3), 23-49.
Porter, L. W. & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80(2), 151-176.
Seo, Ah-Young (2012). Factors Affecting Personal Job Satisfaction Under the Smart Work Circumstance. The Journal of Society for e-business Studies, 13(3), 427-459.
Seo, Keon-Kyo (2013). The Effect of Social Presence to Organizational Commitment in Smart Work Environment:Mediated Effect of Job Satisfaction. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Master's in Chung-Ang University.
Smith, H. C. (1995). Psychology of Industrial Behavior. New York: McGrow-Hill Book Co.
Tapscott, D. & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio.
Tucker, L. R. & Lewis, C. (1973). A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
Wheeler, W. M. (1910). Ants: Their Structure, Development, and Behavior. New York: The Columbia University Press.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수