바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Central Eastern Europe’s Pattern of Industrial Development and Regional Structure in Market Distribution

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2015, v.13 no.6, pp.17-23
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.6.201506.17
Seo, Dae-Sung
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Transnational corporations (TNCs) have influenced drastic changes (financial services, manufacturing, labor, technology transfer) in Central Eastern Europe (CEE). This paper examines the indirect changes in the CEE pattern of industrial development and market distribution. Research design, data, and methodology - Over 25 years, neighboring (or rival) countries competed to attract TNCs as a double-edged strategy for privatization and debt reduction. Through their experience attracting foreign direct investment (FDI), many countries started to reflect aspects of national capitalism. Countries also began to realize in 2010 that TNCs sought to enter markets with more favorable conditions for export-oriented manufacturing. Results - The analysis reveals that TNC investment strategies were aimed at eliminating local competition to acquire industrial "brown fields" to convert into "green fields." CEE countries have since strengthened their national systems and the support of large-scale state-owned enterprises and small and medium-sized start-up enterprises. Conclusions - CEE has changed based on industrial development and a regional structure of TNC market distribution and associated government policies. The pattern toward flexible markets gives countries the ability to further their economies.

keywords
CEE, Market Distribution, Comsumption, Transition, FDI, Competition, Pattern Changes

Reference

1.

Arvey, I., & Vertes, A. (1995).The share of the private sector and the hidden economy in Hungary. Budapest: GKI Economic Research Company press.

2.

Bilsen, V., & Konings, J. (1997). Job creation, job destruction and growth of newly established, privatised and state-owned enterprises in transition economies: survey evidence from Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26 (3), 429-445.

3.

Coffee, J. (1994). Investment Privatisation Funds: the Czech Experience. Proceeding of a Joint Conference of the World Bank and the Central European University Privatisation Project (15 December). Washington DC, United State.

4.

Czech Investment (2014). Czech Investment. Retrieved April 11, 2015 from http://www.czechinvest.org/en/czech-cities-and-regions-rank-highly-in-support-for-foreign-direct-investment.

5.

Earle, J., Frydman, R., Rapaczynski, A., and Turkewitz, J. (1994).Small Privatization: The Transformation of Retail Trade and Consumer Services in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Budapest: Central European University Press.

6.

EBRD (1996). Infrastructure and savings, Transition report 1996. Retrieved October 11, 2014 from http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/transition/TR99.pdf.

7.

EBRD (1997). Enterprise performance and growth, Transition report 1997. Retrieved October11, 2014 from http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/transition/TR99.pdf.

8.

Eurostat (2014). Analysis of EU-27 household final consumption expenditure. Retrieved October 11, 2014 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Household_consumption_expenditure_-_national_accounts.

9.

Foerster, M.F., & Toth, I.G. (1997). Poverty and inequalities:Hungary and the Visegrad countries compared. Proceeding of a Conference of the IBRD (May). London, UK: IBRD..

10.

Frydman, R. & Rapaczynski, A. (1994). Privatisation Eastern Europe: Is the State Withering Away? Budapest: CEU &Oxford University Press.

11.

Halpern, L., & Muraközy, B. (2012). Innovation, Productivity and Exports: the Case of Hungary. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(2),151–173.

12.

Hungarian Central Statistic Office (2015). Hungary: Economic and Financial Data, Retrieved May 15, 2015 from http://www.ksh.hu/docs/eng/imf/nsdp.html.

13.

HVG (2013). Hungarian company toplists (Magyar vállalatok toplistái), Gazdaság news, 26 November, Enterprise (Vallakozas). Budapest, Hungary.

14.

Kim, So-Hyung (2013). The Effect of Service Innovativeness of IT Service Centers: Mediating Role of Behavior Intention. Journal of Distribution Science. 11(10), 17~25.

15.

Kolesár, Peter (2007). Relationships among National Governments and TNCsin Central Europe. Budapest, Hungary: Thesis for M.A. in Central European University.

16.

Lee, Jooh (2012). Global Perspective on Green Sustainability, Corporate Reputation, and Technological Strength for Firm Performance Across Countries. Journal of Distribution Science. 10(8), 15-23.

17.

Lengyel, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Regional innovation systems in Hungary: The failing synergy at the national level. Regional Studies, 45(5), 677-693.

18.

Seo, Daesung (2015). Creative Cultural Localization Ways and IT Market of the EU to Converge the Creative Industries. Journal of Distribution Science. 13(1), 27-33.

19.

Seo, Daesung (2014). Impacts of Innovative EU Companies on Smaller Emerging Markets under an Open Economy. Journal of Distribution Science. 12(10), 37-45.

20.

Seo, Daesung (2012). The impact of EU’s R&D focused Policy on the innovation Edge of Mobile Industry. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, 62, 595-601.

21.

Stephan, J., & Jindra, B. (2005). Knowledge transfer to MNE subsidiaries based in CEE-Integrating knowledge-based and organisational perspectives. Journal of Economics and Business, 8 (1, 2), 11-18.

22.

The World Bank (2015). Economy & Growth, Data. Retrieved April 1, 2015from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/DT.DOD.DECT.CD.

23.

Webster, L. (1993). The Emergence of Private Sector Manufacturing in Hungary. Technical Paper 229. Washington DC: World Bank.

The Journal of Distribution Science