바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

영화의 유통전략에 대한 연구: 심플렉스 해법을 중심으로

Cost Distribution Strategies in the Film Industry: the Simplex Method

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.10, pp.147-152
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.10.201610.147
황희중 (Department of International Trade, Korea National Open University)

Abstract

Purpose - High quality films are affected by both the production stage and various variables such as the size of the movie investment and marketing that changes consumers' perceptions. Consumer preferences should be recognized first to ensure that the movie is successful. If a film is produced without pre-investigation and analysis of consumer demand and taste, the probability of success will be low. This study investigates the balance of production costs, marketing costs, and profits using game theory, suggesting an optimization strategy using the simplex method of linear programming. Research design, data, and methodology - Before the release of the movie, initial demand is assumed to be driven largely by marketing costs. In the next phase, demand is assumed to be driven purely by a movie's production cost and quality, which might also further determine consumer demand. Thus, it is essential to determine how to distribute pure production costs and other costs (marketing) in a limited movie production budget. Moreover, it should be taken into account how to optimally distribute under the assumption that the audience and production company's input resources are limited. This research simplifies the assumptions for large-scale and relatively small-scale movie investments and examines how movie distribution participant profits differ when each cost is invested differently. Results - When first movers or market leaders have to choose both quality and marketing, it has been proven that pursuing a strategy choosing only one is more likely than choosing both. In this situation, market leaders should maximize marketing costs under the premise that market leaders will not lag their quality behind the quality of second movers. Additionally, focusing on movie marketing that produces a quick effect while ceding creative activity to increase movie quality is a natural outcome in the movie distribution environment since a cooperative strategy between market competitors is not feasible. Conclusions - Government film development policy should ignore quality competition between movie production companies and focus on preventing marketing competition. If movie production companies focus on movie production quality improvement then a creative competition would ensue.

keywords
Movie Market, Marketing Expense, Movie Quality, Pay-off Matrix, Simplex Method

참고문헌

1.

Ahmadinia, H., Karim, M., & Ofori, E. (2015). Primary Analysis of Information Distribution at Walkbase Company: Developing an Information Strategy. The International Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 6(4), 5-16.

2.

Chisholm, D. C., Fernández-blanco, V., Abraham Ravid, S., & David Walls, W. (2015). Economics of motion pictures: The state of the art. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39(1), 1-13.

3.

Hwang, H. (2015). Marketing Strategies in the Film Industry:Investment Decision Game Model. The Journal of Distribution Science, 13(10), 109-114.

4.

Mohammadi, S., & Dashtbayaz, M. L. (2015). Depreciation of Non-Temporal Investment, The East Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(3), 17-21.

5.

Lee, N. J. Y. (2011). Localized globalization and a monster national: The host and the south korean film industry. Cinema Journal, 50(3), 45-61.

6.

O'Reilly, D., & Kerrigan, F. (2013). A view to a brand:Introducing the film brandscape. European Journal of Marketing, 47(5), 769-789.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)