바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

후발기업의 전략 모델에 대한 탐색적 연구 : LG전자의 사례를 중심으로

The Strategic Model for the Late Mover: Evidence from the Defiance Case of LG Electronics

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.10, pp.81-91
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.10.201610.81
최규성 (Seoul School of Integrated Sciences & Technologies)
신호상 (Seoul School of Integrated Sciences & Technologies)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Purpose - This study proposes a strategic model for the late mover to effectively penetrate an industry that is dominated by a leading company. Thus, this study presents strategic implications for several late movers in overcoming the advantages of the leading company. Research design, data, and methodology - This study begins with a literature review followed by the formation of a strategic model that consists of: Repositioning, Utilization of Competence, Strategic Leadership, and Innovation. Specifically, this research analyzes LG Electronics (LG) as an example and investigates how LG infiltrates and grows in the water purifier market, overcoming the advantages of the powerful leading company. Results - The major steps taken by LG are summarized into four. First, LG studied the market, which had been conventionally treated as a single market. To penetrate the market, LG founded a new, special market segment. Subsequently, LG further segmented the market, executing a marketing strategy for each segment. Second, the unbending will of top managers was a key factor that addressed the challenge persistently. Third, even though LG was the late mover in the water purifier market, it had several technology competences such as compressor, refrigeration cycles, and algorithms. LG had profound knowledge in technology and used it effectively. Fourth, LG created a premium market through three innovative and distinguished factors such as the stainless water tank, sterilization service, and luxury design. Conclusions - This research draws four key findings from the example of the late mover in the water purifier industry: the reestablishment of a strategic position based on environmental change is an effective strategy for the late mover; strategic leadership is an important motive to generate late mover performance; and the late mover can utilize its existing knowledge and resources to overcome the first mover, such as presenting new added value compared to existing products as an effective catch-up strategy. Consequentially, through the study of performance determinants and the market penetration strategy of the late mover, this research has significance in providing basic material for companies trying to penetrate the market.

keywords
Late mover, Repositioning, Leadership, Utilization of competence, Innovation

참고문헌

1.

Abernathy, W., & Utterback, J. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40-47.

2.

Arthur, W. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116-131.

3.

Bain, Joe S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition. Cambrige, MA:Harvard University Press.

4.

Barney, J. B. (1991). The Resources and Theory of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.

5.

Berndt, E., Pindyck, R., & Azoulay, P. (2003). Consumption externalities and diffusion in pharmaceutical markets: antiulcer drugs. Journal of Industrial Economics, 51(2), 243-270.

6.

Chae, Joo-Seok, Lee, Nam-Gyum, Hwang, Il-Young, & Park, Soon-Young (2015). The Influence of Leadership Style on Employee Creativity: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 5(4), 73-81

7.

Choi, Kyu-Seong, & Park, Cheong-Yeol (2015). A Study on the Determinants and Entry Strategy of Water Purifier Products into the Indian Market: Focused on the Case of LG Electronics Co.. the Korean Society for Indian Studies, 20(2), 1-57.

8.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.

9.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4). 532-550.

10.

Ethiraj, S., & Zhu, D. (2008). Performance effects of imitative entry. Strategic Management Journal, 29(8), 797-817.

11.

Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top exeutives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN:West Publising Company.

12.

Geroski, P. A. (1991). Market dynamics and entry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.

13.

Golder, P. N., & Tellis, G. J. (1993). Pioneering Advantage:Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend? Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 158-170.

14.

Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implication for Strategy Foundation. Califonia Management Review, 119-135

15.

Hambrick, D. C. (1989). Guest editor's introduction: Putting top managers back in the strategy picture. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 5-15.

16.

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.

17.

Hauser, J. R., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 393-408.

18.

Hoppe, H., & Lehmann-Grube, U. (2001). Second-mover advantages in dynamic quality competition. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(3), 419-433.

19.

Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 13, 43-57.

20.

Katz, M., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440.

21.

Kerin, Roger A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Peterson, Robert A. (1992). First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 56, 33-52.

22.

Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (1997). Value innovation: The strategic logic of high growth. Harvard Business Review, January-February. 103-112.

23.

Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review Press.

24.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.

25.

Lee, Dong-Hyun (2005). Latecomer Strategy in Global Steel Industry. International Area Studies Review, 9(2), 346-370.

26.

Lee, Yun-chol, & Lee, Dong-Hyun (1999). Follower's Catch-up Strategies in High-Tech Industry. Journal of Strategic Management, 2(1), 23-46.

27.

LG Electronics (2009). Healthcare business and long-term business report, 10 June

28.

Liao, Shih-Chung (2014). Building a Product Design of Innovative Strategy for Creating Enterprise Development. Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 5(1), 17-25.

29.

Lieberman. M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-Mover Advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41-58.

30.

Lieberman. M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1998). First-mover (dis)advantages:retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1111-1125.

31.

Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The Resource-Based View within the Conversation of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363-380

32.

Markides, C., & Sosa, L. (2013). Pioneering and first mover advantages:The importance of business models. Long Range Planning, 46(4), 325-334.

33.

McDougall, P. P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. (1994). Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6), 469-487.

34.

Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford:Basil Blackwell Ltd.

35.

Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage:A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.

36.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review. 68(4), 79-93.

37.

Pukyong National University (2012). Biofilm-formation ability of the tank samples / antibacterial compare. 4 April

38.

Roberts, P., & McEvily, S. (2005). Product-line expansion and resource cannibalization. Journal of Economic Behavior &Organization, 57(1), 49-70.

39.

Schnaars, S. P. (1994). When Entering Growth Markets, Are Pioneers Better Than Poachers? Business Horizons, 29(March-April), 27-36.

40.

Shankar, V., Carpenter, G., & Krishnamurthi, L. (1998). Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 54-70.

41.

Spender, J. C., & Grant, R. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm:Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 5-9.

42.

Teece, D. (1987). The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal. Ballinger Pub. Co.

43.

Tushman, M., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439-465.

44.

Urban, G., Carter, T., Gaskin, S., & Mucha, Z. (1986). Market share rewards to pioneering brands: an empirical analysis and strategic implications. Management Science, 32(6), 645-659.

45.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.

46.

Yang, Hoe-Chang, & Ju, Young-Hwang (2011). Positive integration of the franchise system: A new perspective on leadership, followership, trust and group efficacy, East Asian Journal of Business Management, 1(1), 5-8.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)