Purpose - This study investigates whether corporate social responsibility(hereafter CSR) management activities affect companies' performance. Depending on the CSR management activities and companies' type (national and multinational), we examined whether there is any difference in their CSR activities on Corporate Performance. Research design, data, and methodology - Data were collected from 230 surveys with a sample group consisting of employees in multinational corporations located in Seoul and Gyeonggi and 224 copies were used from 3 May 2016 to 17 May 2016. The data was analyzed by SPSS 21.0. Results - The empirical results show that CSR management activities positively influence on financial and non-financial corporate achievement and CSR may be interpreted as a strategic method to improve corporate value. But the impacts of CSR activities on performance were different between domestic and multinational corporations. The reason that the legal responsibility was overruled as a factor for financial and non-financial achievement in domestic company may be that CSR management activity is perceived as an indulgence to hide or beautify negative behavior regarding corporate illegal behavior, thus it does not deliver value. Conclusions - CSR activities can be delivered differently between domestic and multinational corporations, and further study should be done why there are differences between corporations.
Ban, Hye-Jung, & Kim, Seog-Soo (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Source of Firm’s Competitive Advantage. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 22(4), 2037-2058.
Banker, R., Potter. G., & Srinivasan, D. (2000). An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan that Includes Nonfinancial Performance Measures. Accounting Review, 75(1), 65-92.
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Row.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39-48.
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2000). Business &Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management (7th ed.). Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Chang, Sug-In (2013). The Effects of the Social Responsibility of the Multinational Corporation (MNC)'s on the Management Performance:Focusing on German, France, Netherlands, and British Subsidiaries in Korea. Zeitschrift der Koreanisch-Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Sozialwissenschaften, 23(3), 61-100.
Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.
Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2003). Sector Bending:Blurring the Lines between Nonprofit and For-Profit. Social Sciences and Modern Society, 40(4), 16-27.
Eells, R., & Walton, C. C. (1961). Conceptual foundations of business. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Im, Jin-Han (2014). A Study on the Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Performance. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Master in Seoul National University.
Kim, Eun-Sun (2011). The Effect Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility On Corporate Performance. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Master in University of Seoul.
Kim, Ji-Hae (2011). The performance of corporate social responsibility. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Ewha Womans University.
McFarland, D. E. (1982). Management and Society: An Institutional Framework. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and Society. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Murray, K. B., & Montanari, J. R. (1986). Strategic Management of the Socially Responsible Firm:Integrating Management and Marketing Theory. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 815-27.
Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1995). Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: the Paradox of Social Cost. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Park, Hun-Joon, & Lee, Jong-Keon (2001). Donation Action and Environment Protection Activity: An Empirical Study between Corporate Social Responsibility Activity of Korean Companies and Financial Performance. 2001 Korean Association of Nonprofit Organization Research Spring Conference. Korean Association of Nonprofit Organization Research (pp.155-177). Seoul, Korea: KANOR.
Park, Jong-Chul, Kim, Kyung-Jin, & Lee, Han-Joon (2010). Developing a Scale for Measuring the Corporate Social Responsibility Activities of Korea Corporation: Focusing on the Consumers'Awareness. Asia Marketing Journal, 12(2), 27-52
Preston, L. E., & O’annon, D. P. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship. A Typology and Analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419-429.
Shin, Jae-Sung (2016). A Study on Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Corporate Image and Corporate Performance. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Master in Chung-Ang University.
Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 97-109.
Suh, Koo-Won, Jung, Girl-Jin, Yang, Young-Jong, & Yoo, Chang-Jo (2006). Advertising and Society. Seoul:Korea Advertising Society.
Ullmann A. A. (1985). Data in Search of a Theory, a Critical Examination of the Relationships among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of US Firms. The Academy of Management Review , 10(3), 540–57.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. G. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.
Zhou, J. Y. (2009). A Study on Corporate Social Responsibility Reflect on Chinese Corporation. Chuncheon, Korea: Thesis for Master in Kangwon National University.