바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

항공사 브랜드 진정성이 소비자 태도에 미치는 영향 : LCC와 FSC의 차이를 중심으로

The Effect of Airline Brand Authenticity: Focus on the Difference of LCC from FSC

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.5, pp.115-123
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.5.201605.115
송상연 (Dept. of International Business, Dongduk Women's University)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Purpose - Nowadays the competition between companies has been intensified in the aviation industry. It is hard to maintain successful market share in challenging managerial environment. Not long ago, a Korean major aviation company had faced social condemnation cause of managerial staff's immoral behaviors. That company suffers great losses in company brand value in terms of authenticity as an aviation company. This research tried to show the effect of brand authenticity in the aviation industry. First of all, this research tried to define the dimensions of the brand authenticities based on the former researches. This research suggested the airline brand authenticities as three kinds of dimensions. The dimensions of authenticities consist of performance aspects, symbolic aspects and moral aspects. And this research also tried to show the relationships between brand authenticities and consumers attitudes. Research design, data and methodology - The empirical research design is based on the experiments with six types of advertisement prototypes. The advertisement prototypes were based on three types of authenticities' characteristics. The prototypes were made of core statements about each authenticity. And the advertisement prototypes also were based on the aviation company types. The types of aviation companies could be divided into FSC(full service carrier)and LCC(low cost carrier). So the whole experiments were performed with six kinds of advertisement prototypes(3 brand authenticities X 2 aviation company types). The age of participants were from 20s to 40s. The proportion of participants' demographics are as follow. Age proportion is 50% of 20s and 50% of 30s and 40s. Gender proportion is 46% males and 54% females. The experiments performed through mobile devices. Advertisement prototypes were exposed to the participants through their mobile devices, and they answered the questionnaires. All the process of experiments were performed by a professional research firm to maintain the quality of data. Results - This research suggested some important outcomes as follow. First, brand authenticity had an important role to make a positive consumer attitude on the aviation company. All the three types advertisement of authenticities had a positive impact on the consumer attitude for the aviation company. Second, the three types of brand authenticities in the performance aspects, symbolic aspects, and moral aspects had a major impact on the consumers attitudes. The performance authenticity had the biggest effect on the consumer attitudes. Third, the types of aviation companies like FSC and LCC had a different correlation with types of authenticities. All the types of authenticities affected on the consumers attitudes in the FSC case. The symbolic authenticity had the biggest effect in the FSC case. But the performance authenticity showed the most striking effect in the LCC case. Conclusion - From this research, we can get a conclusion. The brand authenticity of aviation company should be managed carefully to maintain a positive brand image and consumers attitudes. And airline brand authenticities can be consist of three type dimensions. All the types of authenticities affects on the consumers attitudes positively. The symbolic authenticity affects more in the FSC case, and the performance authenticity influences more in the LCC case.

keywords
Brand Authenticity, Performance Authenticity, Symbolic Authenticity, Moral Authenticity, Brand Attitude

참고문헌

1.

Aaker, D. A. (1991). Brand equity. La gestione del valore della marca. Milano: Franco Angeli.

2.

Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California management review, 38(3), 102-120.

3.

Aaker, D. A. (2012). Building strong brands. New York: Simon &Schuster.

4.

Aaker, J. L., & Maheswaran, D. (1997). The effect of cultural orientation on persuasion. Journal of consumer research, 24(3), 315-328.

5.

Bendall-Lyon, D., & Powers, T. L. (2004). The impact of structure and process attributes on satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(2), 114-121.

6.

Beverland, M. B. (2005). Crafting brand authenticity: the case of luxury wines. Journal of management studies, 42(5), 1003-1029.

7.

Beverland, M. B., Lindgreen, A., & Vink, M. (2008). Projecting Authenticity through advertising: Consumer judgments of advertisers’ claims. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 5-15.

8.

Brown, S., Kozinets, R. V., & Sherry Jr, J. F. (2003). Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 19-33.

9.

Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of consumer research, 34-51.

10.

Chung, H. J., & Ryu, J. S. (2005). A Study of the Influential Factors on Choice Behavior on the Brand Image of Airlines. Korean Journal of Convention, 125-141.

11.

Gilmore, J. H., & Pine, B. J. (2007). Authenticity: What consumers really want. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

12.

Jensen, R. (1999). The dream society: How the coming shift from information to imagination will transform your business. New York: McGraw-Hill.

13.

Kapferer, J. (1992). Strategic brand management: New approaches to creating and evaluating brand equity. London: Kogan Page.

14.

Keller, K. L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity: A blueprint for creating strong brands. Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

15.

Kang, M. S., & Kim, B. J. (2010). Testing Measurement Invariance of Brand Personality Using Multigroup CFA. Korean Journal of Aviation Management, 8(4), 103-114.

16.

Kim, S. H., Park, H. J., & Lee, E. Y. (2014). Brand Attributes Related to the Perceived Brand Authenticity. Korean Journal of Contents, 14(11), 398-410.

17.

Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. International Journal of research in Marketing, 21(3), 203-217.

18.

Lee, T. M., & Kim, D. W. (2012). The Relationship between Luxury Brand Personality and Brand Commitment. Korean Journal of Aviation Management, 10(1), 23-41.

19.

Low, G. S., & Lamb, Jr, C. W. (2000). The measurement and dimensionality of brand associations. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(6), 350-370.

20.

McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of marketing, 66(1), 38-54.

21.

Nan, X., & Heo, K. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63-74.

22.

Park, Jung-Hyang (2006). A Study on the Airline Brand Equity. Tourism Research, 23, 71-95.

23.

Park, Jin-Woo, Robertson, R., & Wu, C. L. (2005). Investigating the effects of airline service quality on airline image and passengers' future behavioral intentions: findings from Australian international air passengers. Journal of Tourism Studies, 16(1), 2-11.

24.

Park, Sung-Hyun, & Kim, You-Kyung (2014). Developing a Scale for Measuring of Authenticity of Brand. Korean Journal for Advertising and Public Relations, 16(2), 46-86.

25.

Park, T. S., & Lee, K. P. (2003). Comparison of Brand Equity and Consumer's Selection Attitudes in Korean Airline Industry. Korean Journal of Tourism Information, 13, 101-121.

26.

Seo, S. W., & Lee, Y. (2013). Quantitative Research for Investigating Internal Structure and the Influence on Brand Attachment, Commitment, Loyalty of Fashion Brand Authenticity. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 63(7), 148-163.

27.

Seo, Y. K., Yoo, H. S., & Kim, H. R. (2014). A Study on the Influence on Brand Attachment and Loyalty of Cosmetic Brand Authenticity. Journal of Channel and Retailing, 19(2), 87-111.

28.

Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of consumer research, 287-300.

29.

Sirgy, M. J. (1985). Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation. Journal of business Research, 13(3), 195-206.

30.

Thomson, M., Macinnis, D. J., & Park, C. W. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of consumer psychology, 15(1), 77-91.

31.

Yi, Y. (1990). The effects of contextual priming in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 215-222.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)