바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Vineyards in Northern U.S. States: Farm Size and Productivity Relationship

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.7, pp.53-61
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.7.201607.53
Choi, Jong-Woo
Lee, Won Fy
Gartner, William C.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - The production efficiency of agricultural crops has been the subject of numerous studies in the field of agricultural economics. This study examines the production efficiency of emerging vineyards in the 14 northern U.S. states and aims to understand raw input and managerial factors affecting the grape production with focusing on the effect of farm size. Research design, data, and methodology - Using a unique survey dataset that was collected from 176 vineyards in 2012, we employed data envelopment analysis (DEA) for estimation of production efficiency in individual vineyards. Production efficiency is regressed on various input and managerial covariates to understand factors influencing the productivity. Results - Although there exists positive correlation between the farm size and productivity of vineyards in Northern U.S. states, we find negative relationship when the farm size is instrumented by the additional farm size expansion indicator. The negative effect is more pronounced for the recently established vineyards. Conclusions - This study suggests that there needs to be adequate managerial improvements for emerging vineyards in northern states for the achievement of increased productivity.

keywords
Productivity, Farm size, DEA, Cold-Hardy Grape Cultivar

Reference

1.

Alvarez, A., & Arias, C. (2004). Technical efficiency and farm size: a conditional analysis. Agricultural Economics, 30(3), 241 – 250.

2.

Bahrami, M., Salehi, M., Akbarzadeh, M., & Morsali, A. (2013). Identification and prioritization of the driving factors of labor productivity in the Melli bank: Iranian Scenario. Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 4(1). 5-10.

3.

Banker, R.D., &Natarajan, R. (2008). Evaluating Contextual Variables Affecting Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Operations Research, 56(1), 48–58.

4.

Johnson, A.L., & Kuosmanen, T. (2012). One-stage and two-stage DEA estimation of the effects of contextual variables. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(2), 559–570.

5.

Julian, J. W., Seavert, C. F., Skinkis, P. A., VanBuskirk, P., & Castagnoli, S. (2008). Vineyard Economics:Establishing and Producing Pinot Noir Wine Grapes in Western Oregon. Technical Report EM 8969-E Oregon State University Extension Service.

6.

Kimhi, A. (2006). Plot size and maize productivity in Zambia:is there an inverse relationship? Agricultural Economics, 35(1), 1–9.

7.

Madzimure, J., Bovula, N., Ngorora, G. P. K., Tada, O., Kagande, S. M., Bakare, A. G., & Chimonyo, M. (2014). Market opportunities and constraints confronting resource-poor pig farmers in South Africa’s eastern cape province. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 5(2). 29-35.

8.

Mago, S. (2014). EcoFarmer in Zimbabwe: A new agricultural development phenomenon. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 4(2). 5-13.

The Journal of Distribution Science