바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Marketing Organization's Regulatory Focus and NPD Creativity: The Moderating Role of Creativity Enhancement Tools

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.7, pp.71-81
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.7.201607.71
Kang, Seong-Ho
Son, Jung-Min
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Because creativity, which is an intangible resource embedded within the company, can offer a competitive advantage, most companies have an interest in promoting creativity among their employees and division(e.g., marketing organization). Creativity renders a sustainable competitive advantage to a firm because it is a strategic resource that is valuable, flexible, rare, and imperfectly imitable or substitutable. Although most companies broadly recognize the importance of creativity, the methods for developing creativity remain elusive. Therefore, the present study investigates how to structure incentives to motivate employees to be more creative and how to develop tools to facilitate creativity. In detail, the present study aimed to examine the relationship between the regulatory focus of marketing organizations(e.g., promotion focus vs prevention focus) and creativity of marketing organizations. In addition, the present study set out to examine the moderating role of interaction of financial reward and creative training in addition to investigating the direct relationship between creativity and regulatory focus in New Product Development(NPD) context. Research design, data, and methodology - The data used to test the hypotheses are drawn from a survey of full time NPD project members(including project manager, designer, engineer, and marketer). The present study utilized data obtained mainly from a database compiled by the Korea Investors Service-Financial Analysis System which provides comprehensive corporate and financial information on firms listed on the Korea Stock Exchange. A study population comprising 1,000 South Korean firms was obtained from this database. We selected 864 firms from the database, and the firms have experiences of new product development project. We collected a total of 162 responses, for a 18.8% response rate. After we excluded 14 questionnaire because of incomplete responses, a total of 148 questionnaire remained(final response rate: 17.1%). Working with a sample of 148 responses in South Korea, hierarchical moderated regression is employed to test research hypotheses(<H1>The relationship between promotion focus and creativity of marketing organization, <H2>The relationship between prevention focus and creativity of marketing organization, <H3>The moderating effect of joint influences(interaction between financial rewards and creativity training) on the relationship between promotion focus creativity of marketing organization, <H4>The moderating effect of joint influences(interaction between financial rewards and creativity training) on the relationship between prevention focus creativity of marketing organization). SPSS 18.0 and AMOS software were used in the data analysis. Results - The empirical study confirmed that promotion focus of marketing organization is positively related to creativity of marketing organization. Also, prevention focus of marketing organization is positively affected to creativity of marketing organization. In addition, the interaction between financial rewards and creativity training moderated the relationship between regularity focus(e.g.), promotion focus vs prevention focus) and creativity of marketing organization. These results suggest that managers can improve the performances of their creative efforts by providing the use of financial rewards and creativity training in combination. Conclusion - Based on results of this study that examine the effects of regulatory focused creative efforts on creativity of marketing organization, promotion focus is helpful with marketing organizations to enhance their service innovation and performance. Prevention focused organization should allow monetary rewards and creativity training to increase their creativity for innovation of new products.

keywords
Promotion Focus, Prevention Focus, Creativity, Financial Reward, Creativity Training

Reference

1.

Amabile, Teresa M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.

2.

Amabile, Teresa M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

3.

Amabile, Teresa M., & Cheek, Jonathan M. (1988). Microscopic and macroscopic creativity. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 11(1), 57-60.

4.

Amabile, Teresa M., Conti, Regina, Coon, Heather, Lazenby, Jeffrey, & Herron, Michael (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.

5.

Anderson, James. C., & Gerbing, David W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.

6.

Andrews, Jonlee, & Smith, Daniel C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(2), 174-187.

7.

Baas, Matthijs, De Dreu, Carsten K. W., & Nijstad, Bernard A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 794-809.

8.

Baer, Markus, Oldham, Greg R., & Cummings, Anne (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter?. Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 569-586.

9.

Burroughs, James E., Dahl, Darren W., Moreau, C. Page, Chattopadhyay, Amitava, & Gorn, Gerald J. (2011). Facilitating and rewarding creativity during new product development. Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 53-67.

10.

Carr, Austin (2010). The most important leadership quality for CEOs? Creativity. Retrieved May 21, 2010, from http://www.fastcompany.com/1648943/creativity-the-mos t-important-leadership-quality-for-ceos-study.

11.

Carson, Stephen J. (2007). When to give up control of outsourced new product development. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 49-66.

12.

Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980.

13.

Chernev, Alexander (2004). Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 557-565.

14.

Cohen, Jacob, Cohen, Patricia, West, Stephen G., & Aiken, Leona S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd editon, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Crowe, Ellen, & Higgins, E. Tory (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132.

16.

Dahl, Darren W., & Moreau, C. Page (2007). Thinking inside the box: Why consumers enjoy constrained creative experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 357-369.

17.

Deci, Edward. L., Koestner, Richard, & Ryan, Richard M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668.

18.

Edwards, Jeffrey R., & Lambert, Lisa Schurer (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22.

19.

Friedman, Ronald S., & Förster, Jens (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1013.

20.

George, Jennifer M., & Zhou, Jing (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: The role of context and clarity of feeling, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687-697.

21.

Hauser, John, Tellis, Gerard J., & Griffin, Abbie (2006). Research on Innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Science, 25(6), 687-717.

22.

Hennessey, Beth A., Amabile, Teresa M., & Martinage, Margaret (1989). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(3), 212-227.

23.

Hennessey, Beth A., & Zbikowski, Susan M. (1993). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward: A further examination of intrinsic motivation training techniques. Creativity Research Journal, 6(3), 297-307.

24.

Higgins, E. Tory (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.

25.

Higgins, E. Tory (1998). From expectancies to worldviews:Regulatory focus in Socialization and cognition. In Darley, John McConnon & Cooper, Joel (ed.). Attribution and social interaction: The legacy of Edward E. Jones, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 243-278.

26.

Higgins, E. Tory, & Spiegel, Scott (2004). Promotion and prevention strategies for self-regulation: A motivated cognition perspective. In Vohs, Kathleen D., & Roy F. Baumeister (ed.). Handbook of self-regulation:Research, theory and applications, New York:Guilford Press, 171-187.

27.

Idson, Larraine Chen, Liberman, Nira, & Higgins, E. Tory (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from non-gains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 252-274.

28.

Im, Su-Bin, & Workman Jr, John P. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 114-132.

29.

Kang, Seong-Ho, Kim, Wan-Min (2014a). The effects of trust on marketing alliance creativity: A comparative study between Korean and Japanese firms. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 19(2), 147-170.

30.

Kang, Seong-Ho, Hur, Won-Moo, & Park, Kyung-Do (2014b). The sources and roles of new product development creativity for successful new product development. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 19(4), 123-147.

31.

Kim, W. Chan, & Mauborgne, Renee (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

32.

Lam, Tom Wing-Hong, & Chiu, Chi-Yue (2002). The motivational function of regulatory focus in creativity, Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(2), 138-150.

33.

Liberman, Nira, Idson, Larraine Chen, Camacho, Christopher J., & Higgins, E. Tory (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1135-1145.

34.

Liberman, Nira, Modlen, Daniel C., Idson, Larraine Chen, & Higgins, E. Tory (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 5-18.

35.

McEvily, Susan K., Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., & Prescott, John E. (2004). The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 713-722.

36.

Neubert, Mitchell. J., Kacmar, K. Michele, Carlson, Dawn S., Chonko, Lawrence B., & Roberts, James A. (2008). Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1220-1233.

37.

Park, Young-Seok, & Jung, Soo-Jung (2000). The effects of monetary rewards on creativity: The moderating effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology. 14(3), 37-49.

38.

Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Lee, Jeong-Yeon, & Podsakoff, Nathan P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.

39.

Scott, Ginamarie, Leritz, Lyle E., & Mumford, Michael D. (2004). Types of creativity training: Approaches and their effectiveness. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(3), 149-179.

40.

Sethi, Rajesh, & Sethi, Anju (2009). Can quality-oriented firms develop innovative new products?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 206-221.

41.

Slater, Stanley F., Hult, G. Tomas M., & Olson, Eric M. (2010). Factors influencing the relative importance of marketing strategy creativity and marketing strategy implementation effectiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 551-559.

42.

Renzulli, Joseph S., Smith, Linda H., White, Alan J., Callahan, Car. M., & Hartman, Robert K. (1976). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students, Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

43.

Song, Michael, & Montoya-Weiss, Mitzi (2001). The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 61-80.

44.

Sternberg, Robert J., & Lubart, Todd I. (1995). Defying the crowd, New York: Free Press.

45.

Sweeney, A. M., Park, J., Clark, S. L., & Freitas, A. L. (2015). Mistakes pertaining to undesired (relative to desired) self-standards elicit immediate enhanced electrocortical signals of error processing. Motivation and Emotion, 1-10.

46.

Tellis, Gerard J., Prabhu, Jaideep C., & Chandy, Rajesh K. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3-23.

47.

Troy, Lisa C., Hirunyawipada, Tanawat, & Paswan, Audhesh K. (2008). Cross-functional integration and new product success: An empirical investigation of the findings. Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 132-146.

48.

Willoughby, Michael, Talon-Renuncio, Julian, Millet-Roig, Jose, & Ayats-Salt, Carlos (2013). University services for fostering creativity in hi-technology firms. The Service Industries Journal, 33(11), 1103-1103.

49.

Wu, Cindy, McMullen, Jeffery S., Neubert, Mitchell J., & Yi, Xiang (2008). The influence of leader regulatory focus on employee creativity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(5), 587-602.

The Journal of Distribution Science