바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1738-3110

논문 상세

이전 다음
선공개 논문 논문 투고

Vol.14 No.8
Citation Share

The Exploratory Research on Object Activity Service Evaluation Model(OA-SEM) - The Application of Retail Industry

The Exploratory Research on Object Activity Service Evaluation Model(OA-SEM) – The Application of Retail Industry

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2016, v.14 no.8, pp.45-50
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.8.201608.45
Lee, Seung-Chang (Small & Medium Business Corporation)
Suh, Eung-Kyo (Graduate School of Business, Dankook University)
Park, Hoon-Sung (UCUBE Inc.)
Lee, Seung-Chang, Suh, Eung-Kyo, & Park, Hoon-Sung. (2016). The Exploratory Research on Object Activity Service Evaluation Model(OA-SEM) - The Application of Retail Industry. The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS), 14(8), 45-50, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.8.201608.45
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

Purpose - This study aimed to develop a new practical and universally applicable service quality model by improving the service quality measurement model proposed by many previous studies. Research design, data, and methodology - An in-depth analysis on what influences such service quality model had on the improvement effect of service quality, and Service Evaluation Model("SEM"), which was revised from the existing service quality measurement model, was developed. The model is divided into the two integrative categories: First, activity, that is the group of service-related activities. Next is item, the group of service-related objects. The level of service is evaluated for each category via survey questionnaire on service level evaluation. Based on the model, SEM has visibility by structuring the whole service industry. Results - For the application of the new service quality model, this study attempted to examine the appropriateness of the newly proposed service quality model by applying it to retail service field. Conclusions - As a result, the proposed service model would be a useful and applicable service quality measurement model required by many organizations. Service company can set up self check service levels. Through these results, they can look for the ways to provide better services to customers. Service users can ensure the objectivity of business plan based upon SEM.

keywords
Service Evaluation Model, Evaluation Model, Distribution Service Industry

참고문헌

1.

Cho, S. B., & Kim, K. Y. (2008). A Comparative Study on the KS-SQI, NCSI, and KCSI. Korea Academic Society of Hotel Administration, 17(3), 213-227.

2.

Cronin, J. Joseph, Jr., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56 (July), 55-68.

3.

Hagel III, J., Brown, J. S., Samoylova, T., Lobaugh, K. M., & Goel, N., (2015). The Retail Transformation:Cultivating choice, Experience, and Trust. Deloitte University Press, Retrieved May 22, 2016, from http://dupress.com/articles/retail-transformation-choice-e xperience-trust/

4.

Kim, J. R. (2015). A Study on the effects of factor of Service Quality, Service Guarantee and Service Value in General Super Model. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(1), 93-103.

5.

Lee, S. C., Suh, E. K., Ahn, S. H., & Park, H. S., (2013). A Study on the necessity of Open Source Software Intermediaries in the Software Distribution Channel. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(2), 45-55.

6.

Lee, S. C., Park, H. S., & Suh, E. K. (2015). Behavior-Structure-Evolution Evaluation Model(BSEM)for Open Source Software Service. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(1), 57-70.

7.

Lee, S. C., Park, H. S., & Suh, E. K. (2016). A Case Study on Application Test of Behavior-Structure-Evaluation Evolution Model(BSEM) for Open Source Software Services. Korea Logistics Review, 26(1), 83-96.

8.

Llosa, S., Chandon, J. L., & Orsingher, C. (1998). An Empirical Study of SERVQUAL’s Dimensionality. The Service Industries Journal, 18 (2), 16-44.

9.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(Fall), 41-50.

10.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perception a of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(Spring), 12-40.

11.

Parasuraman, A, Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420-450.

12.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1993). More on Improving Service-Quality Mearsurement. Journal of Retailing, 69(Spring), 140-147.

13.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1994). Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 58(January), 111-124.

14.

Yoo, H. J., & Song, G. S. (2006). A Study on Evaluation of Service Quality in the Retail Industry using the 6Sigma. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 34(4), 110-140.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)

선공개 논문 논문 투고 OA 정책