바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1738-3110

논문 상세

다음
선공개 논문 논문 투고

Vol.15 No.10
Citation Share

Roles of Power State and Message Types on Restaurant Store Brand Attitude

Roles of Power State and Message Types on Restaurant Store Brand Attitude

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2017, v.15 no.10, pp.5-14
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.10.201710.5
Choi, Nak-Hwan (Dept. of Business Administration, Chonbuk National University)
Dhakal, Anisha (Dept. of Business Administration, Chonbuk National University)
Choi, Nak-Hwan, & Dhakal, Anisha. (2017). Roles of Power State and Message Types on Restaurant Store Brand Attitude. The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS), 15(10), 5-14, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.10.201710.5
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

Purpose - This research aims to find the moderation roles of power states in the effects of four message types (competence self-referencing, competence self-defining, warmth self-referencing, warmth self-defining) on brand attitude. Research design, data, and methodology - A restaurant brand was used as an experimental object, and 4(message types: warmth self-defining message, warmth self-referencing message, competence self-defining message, competence self-referencing message) × 2(power: high power and low power) between-subjects design was employed. Through on-line survey in Nepal, we collected a total of 240 individuals composed of eight experimental groups with 30 members in Nepal. Results - Consumers under low power state formed more positive brand attitude at the warmth self-defining message than any other types of message, while under high power condition, there are neither the attitude differences between competence self-referencing message and competence self-defining message, nor those between competence self-referencing message and warm self-defining message. The significant attitude differences showed between competence self-referencing message and warmth self-referencing message. Conclusions - This study contributes to the advertising theory development. Restaurant store marketers should deliver warmth self-defining message rather than the other three types of message to consumers under low power state, and they should not deliver warmth self-referencing message to consumers under high power state.

keywords
Power State, Identity-Based Message Type, Restaurant Store Brand Attitude

참고문헌

1.

Aaker, J. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-357.

2.

Bakan, D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence:Isolation and Communion in Western Man, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

3.

Belk, R. W., Mayer, R., & Bahn, K. (1982). Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 4-17.

4.

Bhattacharjee, A., Berger, J., & Menon, G. (2014). When Identity Marketing Backfires: Consumer Agency in Identity Expression. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 294-309.

5.

Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The Effects of Message Recipients' Power Before and After Persuasion: A Self-validation Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1040-1053.

6.

Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). Dynamics of Communicator and Audience Power:The Persuasiveness of Competence versus Warmth. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(1), 68-85.

7.

Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378-389.

8.

Fiske, S. T., & Dépret, E. (1996). Control, Interdependence, and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in its Social Context. European Review of Social Psychology, 7(1), 31-61.

9.

French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. In Dorwin Cartwright (eds.), Studies in Social Power, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

10.

Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power Reduces the Press of the Situation: Implications for Creativity, Conformity, and Dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1450-1466.

11.

Galinksy, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and Perspectives not Taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068-1074.

12.

Grier, S. A., & Deshpandé, R. (2001). Social Dimensions of Consumer Distinctiveness: the Influence of Social Status on Group Identity and Advertising Persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 216-224.

13.

Guinote, A., Judd, C. M., & Brauer, M. (2002). Effects of Power on Perceived and Objective Group Variability:Evidence that more Powerful Groups are more Variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 708-721.

14.

Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, Approach, and Inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284.

15.

Mia, M. A. (2017). An Overview of the Microfinance Sector in Bangladesh. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 7(2), 31-38.

16.

Mourali, M., & Yang, Z. (2013). The Dual Role of Power in Resisting Social Influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 539-554.

17.

Lee, J. H., Wu, R., & Fan, L. (2017). Influence on the Use Intention of User’s Traits in China Market. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 7(2), 21-29.

18.

Li, Y., & Li, H. (2017). Research on Core Competence of Cultural Industry in Korea. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 7(2), 17-20.

19.

Oyserman, D. (2009). Identity-based Motivation:Implications for Action-readiness, Proceduralreadiness, and Consumer Behaviour. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 250–260.

20.

Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand Attachment and Brand Attitude Strength: Conceptual and Empirical Differentiation of Two Critical Brand Equity Drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 1-17.

21.

Reed, A., Forehand, M. R., Puntoni, S., & Warlop, L. (2012). Identity-Based Consumer Behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 310–321.

22.

Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and Consumer Behavior: How Power Shapes Who and What Consumers Value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 352-368.

23.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In M. P. Zanna (ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

24.

Shang, J., Croson, R., & Reed, A. (2007). “I” Give, but “We” Give More: The Impact of Identity and the Mere Social Information Effect on Donation Behavior. NA-Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 421-428.

25.

Smith, W. B., Bruner, S. J., & White, R. W. (1956). Opinions and Personality. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

26.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

27.

Weick, M., & Guinote, A. (2007). When Subjective Experiences Matter: Power Increases Reliance on the Ease of Retrieval. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 956-970.

28.

Zhang, Y., & Khare, A. (2009). The Impact of Accessible Identities on the Evaluation of Global Versus Local Products. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 524-537.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)

선공개 논문 논문 투고 OA 정책