- Log In/Sign Up
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS, ESCI
ISSN : 1738-3110
The Effect of FTA's Results on China Distribution Company
Abstract
Purpose - The world economy is changing with FTA. Lots of FTAs are going on between countries and economic blocs in the world economy as the battle field of FTA. This study is aims to suggest a practical data about Korea-China FTA by analyzing an economic ripple effect and main issues on Korea-China FTA negotiation. Research design, data, and methodology - This study analyzes the economic impact and major issues expected during the promotion period of Korea-China FTA, and promoted the purpose of this research with literature review and comparative analysis. Result - FTA agreement with China is expected to contribute to Korean economic growth by bringing effectiveness of securing and resolving mutual trade conflict, and one-sided trade protection control of Chinese domestic demand market. The potentiality between United States and Korea is also very important issue. Conclusions - To minimize the adverse effects of FTA and to maximize the positive effects on the logistics industry, the Correspondence strategy is suggested based on the effects of FTA after analyzing the entire situation of the logistics. Especially, this article places emphasis on a close cooperation system between the government agencies to get a good conclusion from the negotiation even if the e-Commerce issue to be a critical point under Korea-China FTA.
- keywords
- GATT, FTA, WTO
Reference
Ajw (2011). Japanese Business Fear Impact of U.S.-South Korea FTA, Ajw by the Asahi Shimbun, 14 October, Osaka, Japan.
Baldwin, Richard E. (2003). The Spoke Trap: Hub and Spoke Bilateralism in Asia. Unpublished paper written for the Korean Institute for International Economic Policy, 8 December 2003.
Bernhofen, D. M., & Brown, J, C. (2004). A direct test of the theory of comparative advantage: The case of Japan. Journal of political Economy, 112, 48-67.
Bhagwati, J. (1993). Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview. in J. De Melo D. Rodrick (eds.). New Demensions in Regional Integration. Cambridge:Cambridge Press.
Burns, William J. (2011). Asia, the Americas, and U.S. Strategy for a New Century. remarks at World Affairs Councils of America National Conference, Washington, November 4, 2011, Retrieved October 20, 2016, from https://www.state.gov/s/d/2011/176667.htm.
Cernat, L. (2001). Assessing Regional Trade Arrangement:Are South-South RTAs More Trade Diverting?. UNCTAD Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series, 16.
Clinton, Hillary (2011). America’s Pacific Century, Foreign Policy. Retrieved October 20,from 2016, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/11/americas_pacific_century.
Cooper, William H. (2011) U.S.-Japan Economic Relations:Significance, Prospects, and Policy Options. Congressional Research Service, 2011, 2.
Daily Yomiuri Online (2012). FTA threatens Japanese Firms/South Korean-U.S. Trade Pact Likely to Hinder Auto, Electronics Makers, 17 March, Tokyo, Japan.
Frankel, J., & Wei, S. J. (1998). Regionalization of World Trade and Currencies: Economics and Politics. In J. Frankel (ed.). The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gestner, E. (1988). Do Higher Prices Signal Higher Quality? Journal of Marketing Research, 22, pp.209-215.
Sproles, G.(1977), New Evidence on Price and Quality, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 11, 1985, pp.63-77.
Harris, R. (1984). Applied General Equilibrium Analysis of Small Open Economies with Scale Economies and Imperfect Competition. American Economic Review, 77, 1016-103.
Hertel, Thomas W. (1997). Global Trade Analysis, Modeling and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kim, H. (2011). Dynamics of free trade agreements:Benefits and strategic considerations. SERI Quarterly (July), 1-6.
Landreth, H., & Colander, D. (2002). History of Economic Thought (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Lee, Je-Hong (2014). An Empirical Analysis on Korean Consumer Welfare Levels Accounting for U.S.A. Product Price Fluctuations After the Korea-U.S.A. FTA Effectuation. Journal of Korea Trade, 18(2), 49-74.
Lichtenstein, D, R., & Burton, S. (1989). The Relationship between Perceived and Objective Price –Quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(Nov), 429-443.
Manyin, Mark E, Emma Chanlett-Avery, & Nikitin, M. B. (2011). U.S.-South Korea Relations, Congressional Research Service. CRS Report for Congress, November 28.
Niblett, R. (2012). The Economic Crisis and the Emerging Powers: Towards the International Order?. Area:International Economy and Trade.
Nira, A. S., Linb, K., & Lianga, G. S. (2003). Port Choice Behavior from the Perspective of the Shipper. Maritime Policy and Management, 30(2), 165-173.
Olson, Jerry, C., & Jacoby, J. (1997). Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process, In Proceedings of the third annual conference of the association for consumer research (ed.). M. Venkatesan, pp.167-179.
Panagariya, A., & Bhagwati, J. (1996). Free Trade Areas or Free Trade? The Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements (eds.). (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute Press, 1996).
Robinson, S., & Thierfeder, K. (1999). Trade Liberalization and Regional Integration: The Search for Large Numbers. International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, DC. (January, 1999).
Robinson, R. (2002). Ports as Elements in Value-Driven Supply Chain Systems: the New Paradigm. Maritime Policy and Management, 29(3), 241-255.
Saleh, F., & Lalonde, B. J. (1972). Industrial Buying Behaviour and the Motor Carrier Selection Decision. Journal of Purchasing, 8(1), 18-33.
Sariisik, D. (2010). Turkey looking to become a logistics leader in black sea basin. Hurriyet Daily News. pp. 1-5.
Serdar, S., Asan, U., & Yilmaz, I. (2004). Benchmarking logistics in between Turkey and European countries. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Transport Research(pp.1-12). Istanbul, Turkey.
Shin, D. C. (1999). A Computable Equilibrium Analysis in International Trade. Seoul, Korea: Sekyungsa.
Venables, J. A. (1999). Regional Integration Agreements: A force for convergence or divergence?. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2260, World Bank, Washington, DC. December.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations