바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

The Effect of Audit Quality on Crash Risk: Focusing on Distribution & Service Companies

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2017, v.15 no.8, pp.47-54
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.8.201708.47
Chae, Soo-Joon
Hwang, Hee-Joong

Abstract

Purpose - According to agency theory, managers have incentives to adjust firm revenues to meet earnings expectations or delay bad news disclosure because of performance-based compensation and their reputation in the market. When the bad news accumulates, stock prices fail to reflect all available information. Thus, market prices of stocks are higher than their intrinsic value. After all, bad news crosses the tipping point, it comes out all at once. That results in stock crashes. Auditors can decrease stock crash risk by reducing agency costs through their informational role. Especially, stock price crash risk is expected to be lower for firms adopting high-quality audits. We focus on distribution and service industry to examine the relation between audit quality and stock price crash risk. Industry specialization and auditor size are used as proxies for auditor quality. Research design, data and methodology - Our sample contains distribution and service industry firms listed in KOSPI and KOSDAQ during a period of 2004-2011. We use a logistic regression to test whether auditor quality influences crash risk. Auditor quality was measured by industry specialist auditor and Big4 / non-Big4 dichotomy. Following the approach in prior researches, we use firm-specific weekly returns to measure crash risk. Firms experiencing at least one stock price crash in a specific week during year are classified as the high risk group. Results - The result of analyzing 429 companies in distribution and service industry is summarized as follows: Above all, it is shown that higher audit quality has a significant negative(-) effect on the crash risk. Crash risk is alleviated for firms audited by industry specialist auditors and Big 4 audit firms. Therefore, our results show that hypotheses are supported. Conclusions - This study is very meaningful as the first study which investigated the effects of high audit quality on stock price crash risk. We provide evidence that high-quality auditors reduce stock price crash risk. Our finding implies that the risk of extreme losses can be reduced through screening of high-quality auditors. Therefore investors and regulators may utilize our findings in their investment and rule making decisions.

keywords
Audit Quality, Big4 Auditor, Industry Specialist Auditor, Stock Crash Risk, Distribution &amp, Service

Reference

1.

Ball, R. (2009). Market and political/regulatory perspectives on the recent accounting scandals. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(2), 277-323.

2.

Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., & Yang., J. S. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22(September), 71-97.

3.

Becker, C. L., Defond, M. L., Mark, L., Jiambalvo, J., & Sunramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(Spring), 1-24.

4.

Bleck, A., & Liu, X. (2007). Market transparency and the accounting regime. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(2), 229–256.

5.

Cahan, S. F., Chaney, P. K., Jeter, D. C., & Zhang, W. (2013). Damaged auditor reputation and analysts'forecast revision frequency. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32(1), 33-60.

6.

Casterella, J., Lewis, J. B., & Walker, P. (2004). Auditor industry specialization, client bargaining power, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(1), 123-140.

7.

Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. (2001). Forecasting Crashes: Trading Volume, Past Returns, and Conditional Skewness in Stock Prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 345-381.

8.

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 3(December), 183-199.

9.

Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70, 193-225.

10.

DeFond, M. L., Hung, M., Li, S., & Li., Y. (2015). Does mandatory IFRS adoption affect crash risk?. The Accounting Review, 90(1), 265-299.

11.

Diamond. D. (1985). Optimal release of information by firms. Journal of Finance, 40, 1071-1094.

12.

Dunn, K. A., & Mayhew, B. W. (2004). Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(1), 35-58.

13.

Fan, J. P. H., & Wong, T. J. (2005). Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(1), 35-72.

14.

Francis, J. R., Maydew, E. L., & Sparks, H. C. (1999). The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18(Fall), 17-35.

15.

Godfrey, J. M., & Hamilton, J. (2005). The impact of R&D intensity on demand for specialist auditor services. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(1), 55-93.

16.

Graham. J., Harvey, C., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40, 3-73.

17.

Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 31(September), 405-440.

18.

Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2003). Differences of opinion, shot-sales constraints, and market crashes. The Review of Financial Studies, 16, 487-525.

19.

Huang, W., Liu, Q., Rhee, G., & Wu, F. (2012). Extreme downside risk and expected stock returns. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(5), 1492-1502.

20.

Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R2 and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 67-86.

21.

Ibragimov, R., & Walden, J. (2007). The limits of diversification when losses may be large. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(8), 2551-2569.

22.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.

23.

Jin, L., & Myers, C. S. (2006). R2 around the world:New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 257-292.

24.

Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2004). Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 473-495.

25.

Kim, J. B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk :firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100, 639-662.

26.

Kothari, S. P., Shu, S., & Wysocki, P. D. (2009). Do manager withhold bad news?. Journal of Accounting Research, 47, 241-276.

27.

Krishnan, G. (2003). Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22(March), 109-126.

28.

Mansi, S. A., Maxwell, W. F., & Miller, D. P. (2004). Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors?. Evidence from the bond market. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(4), 755-793.

29.

Mayhew, B., & Wilkins, M. S. (2003). Audit firm industry specialization as a differentiation strategy:Evidence from fees charged for firms going public. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22, 33-52.

30.

Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movement?. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 215-260.

31.

Myers, J., Myers, L., & Omer, T. (2003). Exploring the term of the auditor–client relationship and the quality of earnings: a case for mandatory auditor rotation?. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 779–799.

32.

Nagar. V., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. (2003). Discretionary disclosure and stock-Based incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34, 283-309.

33.

Nah, C., & Choi, K. (2005). The Effect of Audit Firm Industry Expertise on the Quality of Earnings. Accounting and Auditing Research, 41, 261-298.

34.

Palmrose, Z. V. (1989). The relation of audit contract type to audit fees and hours. Accounting Review, 64(July), 488-500.

35.

Romer, D. (1993). Rational asset price movements without news. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1112-1130.

36.

Santa-Clara, P., & Yan, S. (2010). Crashes, volatility, and the equity premium: Lessons from S&P 500options. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), 435-451.

37.

Sunder, S. (2010). Riding the accounting train: From crisis to crisis in eighty years. Presentation at the Conference on Financial Reporting, Auditing and Governance, April 23. Lehigh University. Bethlehem. PA.

38.

Verrecchia, R. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 97-180.

39.

Willenborg, M. (1999). Empirical analysis of the economic demand for auditing in the initial public offerings market. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 225-238.

The Journal of Distribution Science