바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1738-3110

논문 상세

이전 다음
선공개 논문 논문 투고

Vol.16 No.5
Citation Share

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Korean Retail Firms

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Korean Retail Firms

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2018, v.16 no.5, pp.31-43
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.16.5.201805.31
Lee, Jeong-Hwan (College of Economics and Finance, Hanyang University)
Kang, Yun-Sik (Division of Business Administration & Accounting, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Sang-Su (Department of Economics, Korea National Open University)
Lee, Jeong-Hwan, Kang, Yun-Sik, & Kim, Sang-Su. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Korean Retail Firms. The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS), 16(5), 31-43, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.16.5.201805.31
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

Purpose - We examine how a Korean retail firm's social responsibility is related to its financial performances. The traditional view of corporation expects a negative relationship, while the stakeholder theory expects a positive one. Research design, data, and methodology - We adopt the ESG score, published by Korean Corporate Governance Service to measure the level of socially responsible activity for the Korean retail firms. The ordinary least square method is adopted to investigate this relationship. The publicly traded retail firms are examined from 2011 to 2016. Results - We find that the total ESG score is negatively related to ROE but shows no statistically significant relationship with ROA and Tobin's Q value. However, a firm's environmental score is negatively related with both of ROE and ROA. Its social score is no conclusive relationship with the performance measures. The governance score is negatively related to the value of Tobin's Q. Conclusions - This paper generally supports the traditional view of corporate theory, especially in terms of ROE. This evidence is not well aligned with the existing study for Korean corporations generally documenting positive relationships. We find almost no empirical evidence supporting the stakeholder theory of corporation in the Korean retail industry.

keywords
Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Performance, Retail Industry

참고문헌

1.

Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.

2.

Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (2009). Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: An update and reinvestigation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), 61-78.

3.

Cho, E., & Park, H. (2015). Is CSR Really Profitable? Evidence From Korea. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(6), 2167.

4.

Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. M., & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 35(3), 291-311.

5.

Cui, J., Jo, H., & Na, H. (2016). Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry?. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-24.

6.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

7.

Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

8.

Friedman, M. (2007). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. Berlin, German: Springer.

9.

Jang, J. I., & Choi, H. S. (2010). The relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 23(2), 633-648.

10.

Kim, Y. S., & Wee, J. B. (2011). Comprehensive analysis of corporate social responsibility. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 24(5), 38.

11.

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.

12.

McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.

13.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.

14.

Na, Y., & Hong, S. H. (2011). An Empirical Analysis on Value Relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities by Firm Size. Korean Accounting Journal, 20(5), 36.

15.

Peloza, J. (2009). The Challenge of Measuring Financial Impacts From Investments in Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518-1541. doi:10.1177/0149206309335188.

16.

Posnikoff, J. F. (1997). Disinvestment from South Africa: They did well by doing good. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(1), 76-86.

17.

Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Wazzan, C. P. (1999). The effect of socially activist investment policies on the financial markets: Evidence from the South African boycott. The Journal of Business, 72(1), 35-89.

18.

Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319.

19.

Wright, P., & Ferris, S. P. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 77-83.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)

선공개 논문 논문 투고 OA 정책