바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Distribution and Application of Community-based Disaster Risk Information : Lessons from Shiga Prefecture in Japan

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2018, v.16 no.6, pp.15-23
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.16.6.201806.15
Choi, Choongik
Choi, Junho

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to explore the distribution and application of community-based disaster risk information and employ a case study as a qualitative research method to make some implications and suggestions for disaster management in the future. Research design, data, and methodology - This research has basically adopted an idiographic approaches to examine the basic policy of integrated flood risk management of Shiga prefecture in Japan. The methodology is based on a retrospective analysis, which starts from critical events and traces backwards processes to find out what goes well or wrong. Results - The results of this paper support that the multiple stakeholders in a community have to share and distribute disaster risk information in the proper time. The distribution and application of community-based disaster risk information cannot be overemphasized in that the local communities are culturally rich in traditional flood management knowledge, have voluntary organizations and have enjoyed mutual support and human network to cope with floods. Conclusions - The study results also imply that local residents of the community will be abe to have an important role in coping with natural disasters, which involves more proactive actions than passive actions for the enhancement of disaster management.

keywords
Community-based Disaster Management, Distribution of Risk Information, Shiga Prefecture

Reference

1.

Chen, L. C., Liu, Y. C., & Chan, K. C. (2006). Integrated community based disaster management program in Taiwan: A case study of Shang-an Village. Natural Hazards, 37, 209-223.

2.

Chess, C., & Purcell, K. (1999). Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works. Environmental Science & Technology, 33(16), 2685-2692.

3.

Cho, M. R., & Mukoyama, M. (2016). Conceptual framework of reverse retail internationalization:From the perspective of retail Innovation and retail. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(11), 5-17.

4.

Choi, C. I. (2015). A discourse on the paradigm shift of national risk management in risk society. Journal of the Korean Cadastre Information Association, 17(2), 37-45.

5.

Hill, T., & Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT analysis: It’s time for a product recall. Long Range Planning, 20(1), 46-52.

6.

Kim, E. J. (2016). A study on public ethics of care: Care, justice and economics of social service. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(10), 39-45.

7.

Lee, J. W. (2017). Critical factors affecting consumer acceptance of online health communication: An application of service quality models. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 4(3), 85-94.

8.

Mehadi, M., Mazumder, M., & Hossain, D. M. (2018). Research on corporate risk reporting: Current trends and future avenues. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(1), 29-41.

9.

Phuoc, L. T., Kim, K. S., & Su, Y. (2018). Reexamination of estimating beta coefficient as a risk measure in CAPM. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(1), 11-16.

10.

Rauch, P. (2007). SWOT analyses and SWOT strategy formulation for forest owner cooperations in Austria. European Journal of Forest Research, 126, 413-420.

11.

Seong, N. C., Moon, J. S., & Park, K. H. (2016). The effect of distribution enterprise leader's coaching behavior on organizational citizenship behavior and turnover Intention: Mediating role of authentic leadership and moderating role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(1), 75-84.

12.

Shiga Prefecture (2010). The policy of river improvement. Retrieved May 2, 2018 from http://www.pref.shiga.lg.jp/h/kako/kikaku/files/shigakennokasenseibihoushin.pdf

13.

Shiga Prefecture (2014). The basic policy of integrated flood risk management. Retrieved May 2, 2018from http://www.pref.shiga.lg.jp/h/ryuiki/kihonhousin/kihonhousin.html

14.

The residents committee for Shiga Prefecture flood management (2008). Declaration of Shiga Prefecture residents. Retrieved May 2, 2018 from http://www.pref.shiga.lg.jp/h/ryuiki/files/zyuminkaigi-teigen.pdf

15.

Vanclay, F. (2002). Conceptualizing social impact. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(3), 183-211.

The Journal of Distribution Science