바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

소비자의 그린 제품 구매에 있어 "그린" 의미의 재발견

Revisiting of Greenness to Consumers in Green Purchases

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.10, pp.107-114
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.10.201910.107
이한석 (Dept. of Global Business, Sangmyung University)
홍성태 (Dept. of Global Business, Sangmyung University)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Purpose - This is longitudinal research which aims to investigate the meaning of greenness to consumers' behavior. Consumers adopt green marketing as a new factor in product buying and consumption and more and more consumers prefer green product and services. Consumers' green buying behavior can be different from other purchasing experiences. There would be changes in the meaning of green as time passed and it can be different from countries to other countries. This study examines focus group studies with several groups. There is a ten-year gap between 2010 focus group and 2019 focus group interviews. With this ten-year gap, we can find the change of greenness to consumers. Research design, data, and methodology - The data were collected from Turkish, Korean, Kazakhstan people. This is a cross-sectional study and focus group interview was designed. We can gain information relevant to the research problem with using focus group study and get some insights into basic needs and attitudes of green marketing. The subjects for green purchase interviewee were confined to under 40 years old's shoppers regardless of gender. The first study was investigated with several groups in 2010 and the second interview were conducted in 2019. Results - Results show that the meaning of greenness for consumer has changed over time in accordance with the growing accordance of environmental sustainability. Basically, green marketing still means valuable, natural, recycle-able, good for health, clean, smart behavior, essential benefit. The concept of greenness significantly evolved since it was investigated in 2010. It moves away from focusing on specific environmental issues to considering global sustainability issues. Especially we found that greenness can be related with globalization, higher education, social status at the 2019 interview. Conclusions - This paper attempted to confirm the green marketing is essential and expands its meaning to various aspect. Usually, we can think green marketing is everywhere, therefore, people don't care about green issues in real. But consumers are adopting green marketing more and more, it can be a means to attract potential consumers. Therefore, companies should provide enough greenness information for people and they might apply greenness communication to attract potential customers.

keywords
Green marketing, Qualitative research, Sustainability

참고문헌

1.

Aaker, D. (1996). Building Strong Brands. New York, NY:The Free Press.

2.

Banerjee, Subhabrata, Gulas, C. S., & Iyer, E. (1995). Shades of Green: A Multidimensional Analysis of Environmental Advertising, Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 21-31.

3.

Barbarossa, C., De Pelsmacker, P., & Moons, I. (2017). Personal values, green self-identity and electric car adoption, Ecological Economics, 140, 190-200.

4.

Chen, Y. (2010). The Drivers of Green Brand Equity:Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust, Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307-319.

5.

Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability, Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471-486.

6.

Dangelico, R. M., & Vocalelli, D. (2017). “Green Marketing”: An alanysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature, Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1263-1279.

7.

Grant, John (2008). Green marketing, Strategic Direction, 24(6), 25-27.

8.

Grankvist, G, & Biel, A. (2001). The Importance of belief and purchase criteria in the choice of eco-labeled food products, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 405-410.

9.

Greenbaum, Thomas L. (1993). The Handbook of Focus Group Research, Lexington Books, New York: New York.

10.

Hartmann, P., Ibanez, V. A., & Sainz, F. J. (2005). Green Branding Effects on Attitude: Functional Versus Emotional Positioning Strategies, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23(1), 9-29.

11.

Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity, Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.

12.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (1994). Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Sage Publications. London.

13.

Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The Sustainability liability :potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18-31.

14.

Mai, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2012). Taste lovers versus nutrition fact seekers: how health consciousness and self-efficacy determine the way consumers choose food products, Journal of Consumer Behavior, 51(1), 37-51.

15.

Moser, A. K. (2015). Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-enviornmental purchasing behavior, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(3), 167-175.

16.

Nuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2017). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: The case of organic food. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 323-337.

17.

Olson, E. (2013). It’s not easy being green: The effects of attribute tradeoffs on green product preference and choice, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 171-184.

18.

Papadas, K. K., Avlonitis, G. J., & Carrigan, M. (2017). Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation, Journal of Business Research, 80, 236-246.

19.

Parker, B. T. (2009). A Comparison of Brand Personality and Brand User-Imagery Congruence, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(3), 175-184.

20.

Patterson, M. (1999). Re-Appraising the Concept of Brand Image, Journal of Brand Management, 6(6), 409–426.

21.

Paul, J., & Rana, J. (2012). Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(6), 412-422.

22.

Perreault, W. D., Cannon, J. P., & McCathy, E. J.(2010). Essentials of marketing, McGraw Hill, p122.

23.

Polonsky, M. J., & Rosenberger III, P. J. (2001). Reevaluating green marketing: A strategic approach. Business horizons, 44(5), 21-30.

24.

Rios, F. J., Luque Martinez, T., Fuentes Moreno, F., & Cañadas Soriano, P. (2006). Improving attitudes toward brands with environmental associations: an experimental approach. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 26-33.

25.

Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analyzing qualitative data (pp.187-208). Routledge.

26.

Saifullah, M. K., Kari, F. B., & Ali, M. A. (2017). Linkage between public policy, green technology and green products on environmental awareness in the urban Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 4(2), 45-53.

27.

Schlossberg, H. (1991). Innovation Seems to Elude ‘Green Marketers’. Marketing News, 25(15), 16-20.

28.

Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of consumer research, 9(3), 287-300.

29.

Stewart, David W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice, Sage: Newbury Park, CA.

30.

Stisser, P. (1994). A deeper shade of green. American Demographics, 16(3), 24-29.

31.

Strauss, Anselm C., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Methods and Procedures, Sage: Newbury Park, CA.

32.

Tanner, C., & Wölfing Kast, S. (2003). Promoting Sustainable Comsumption: Determinants of Green Purchases by Swiss Consumers, Psychology &Marketing, 20(10), 883-902.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)