바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

가상현실(VR)에서 품질기능전개(QFD)를 활용한 요구사항 분석

Analysis of Requirements Using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in Virtual Reality(VR)

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.2, pp.101-107
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.2.201902.101
박지혜 (dept. of Management Information Systems, Jeju National University)
김민철 (dept. of Management Information Systems, Jeju National University)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to analyze the user requirements and developer requirements in virtual reality(VR), and suggest ways to increase the satisfaction of users who experience virtual reality. Specifically, focused on experience store of VR as a distribution retailer, user requirements were analyzed according to the results of previous research that the characteristics of Affordance, Presence, and Head Mounted Display (HMD) affect user satisfaction. Research, design, data, and methodology - Based on previous studies, in this study, we analyzed the importance of immerse, interaction, perception, and presence for the satisfaction of the user through the questionnaire, and the user experiences virtual reality (VR) The importance of HMD, Presence, Affordance, and experience satisfaction were analyzed. Based on this, we analyzed the user requirements and the developer requirements based on the questionnaires and interviews of the experts, starting from the user's desire or preference using QFD technique. Results - As a result of the analysis, the development factors that occupied a big part in the virtual reality field appeared to be visual. In detail, this showed that there was a lack of sense of presence for users. This should be improved. This paper shows that the requirements for visual, auditory, and tactile development are necessary. For the satisfaction of the users of virtual reality (VR) users, it is necessary to develop them according to their priority in consideration of importance and difficulty in the future. Conclusions - In this study, it was suggested that development according to priority should be considered, considering the difficulty level. Based on the results of this study, the following suggestions are made. First, we tried to search the list of user requirements as much as possible, but it is likely to change due to the development of VR technology. Therefore, it is necessary for developers to continually supplement user requirements with recent research literature. Second, development priorities according to difficulty level should be considered. This aspect should be considered in the actual VR development process, so if the numerical value of the difficulty is calculated, it should be presented in the research.

keywords
Virtual Reality, Affordance, Presence, Quality Function Deployment, Experience Store

참고문헌

1.

Adams, E. (2004). Postmodernism and the three types of immersion. Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Games.

2.

Akao, Y., King, B., & Mazur, G. H. (1990). Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design (Vol. 21). Cambridge, MA:Productivity press.

3.

Barfield, W., Zeltzer, D., Sheridan, T., & Slater, M. (1995). Presence and performance within virtual environments. Virtual environments and advanced interface design, 473-513.

4.

Burdea, G. C., & Coiffet, P. (2003). Virtual reality technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &Sons.

5.

Canovas, D. S., Marin, J. A. G., Beltran, F. A., Caparros, A. R., Mochon, J. F. C., & Vargas-Martin, F. (2017). U.S. Patent Application. No. 14/792, 366.

6.

Cha, E. J., & Han, J. Y. (2016). Virtual Reality contents:a full sensorial experience. Korean Society of Spatial Design, 41, 9-17.

7.

Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449-462.

8.

Dünser, A., & Billinghurst, M. (2011). Evaluating augmented reality systems. In Handbook of augmented reality (pp. 289-307). New York, NY: Springer.

9.

Fiatal, T. (2014). U.S. Patent 8,793,305. Washington, DC:U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

10.

Hong, Y. K., Cho, M., & Jeon, J. S. (2018). The Effect of Presence, Physical Environment and Human Service on Revisit Intention in VR Theme Park: Focusing on the Mediated Effect of Delight. Indian Journal of Public Health Research &Development, 9(11).

11.

Jeon, G. R. (2017). A Study on the Visual Characteristics of the Virtual Reality Based on HMD. Animation research, 13(1), 66-83.

12.

Lee, H. J. (2003). A Study on User Centered Design Process of Virtual Reality Contents. Archives of Design Research, 191-200.

13.

Leem, E. S., & Woo, T. (2016). Exploratory Research on Virtual Reality Contents Design Methods based on Head Mounted Device. Journal of Korean Society of Media and Arts, 14, 91-106.

14.

Nam, H. W. (2001). The Study of Sensibility Interface for Virtual Reality. Journal of Digital Design, 13-22. Retrieved May 22, 2018, from http://www.lncc.br/~jauvane/papers/RelatorioTecnicoLNCC-0603.pdf

15.

Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38-43.

16.

Park, J. B., & Park, C. H. (2017), Augmented Reality based Extended Interaction between Reality and Virtuality. The HCI Society of Korea, 35, 1114-1117.

17.

Park, M. H., & Chung, K. W. (2010). A Study on design application case of the Affordance. Journal of Digital Design, 10(2), 23-32.

18.

Park, S. Y. (2008). The development of Goguryo Mural Contents Experienced with Five Senses Based on Virtual Reality. Journal of Digital Design, 8(4), 137-146.

19.

Sandor, C., & Klinker, G. (2007). Lessons learned in designing ubiquitous augmented reality user interfaces. In Emerging technologies of augmented reality:interfaces and design (pp. 218-235). IGI Global.

20.

Song, H. D., & Park, H. J. (2009). Exploring Factors that Affect the Usability of Digital Textbook based on Affordance Perspectives. Education Engineering Research, 25(3), 135-155.

21.

Wolf, M. J., & Perron, B. (2013). Immersion, Engagement, and Presence: A Method for Analyzing 3-D Video Games Alison McMahan. In The Video Game Theory Reader (pp. 89-108). New York, NY: Routledge.

22.

Zairi, M., & Youssef, M. A. (1995). Quality function deployment: A main pillar for successful total quality management and product development. International Journal of Quality &Reliability Management, 12(6), 9-23.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)