바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Digital Transformations to Improve the Work and Distribution of the State Scholarships Programs

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2019, v.17 no.3, pp.41-47
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.17.3.201903.41
Kireyeva, Anel A.
Lakhonin, Vassiliy
Kalymbekova, Zhanna
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - Based on the analysis of Kazakhstan's experience of digital transformation, this study suggests a concept for digital solution to optimize organizational process, create trust networking between the center of state scholarships programs and recipients. In addition, the authors contribute to the current discussions of an effective digital transformation of state services. Research design, data, and methodology - Policy analysis is based on the combination of both primary and secondary materials collected during a Policy Research Project conducted in Kazakhstan in 2017. It involved semi-structured interviews with the state scholarship' recipients, ICT experts and findings from academic articles. Results - Findings are represented via Policy Development Matrix - a table with three options (status quo, partial change, total change) to deal with policy challenges. Authors suggest a concept for digital solution following the Customer Relationship Management (CRM) principles for optimizing core business processes, communication and networking strategies of the state scholarships program. Conclusions - At the time when digitalization becomes trending for states, the transformation of the state education policy is inevitable. The rapid development of digital technologies creates new opportunities for a single integration platform with key principles of Smart Remote Management in the state scholarships programs.

keywords
Digital Transformation, Digital Solution, Smart Remote Management, State Policy, State Service, State Scholarship, Bolashak International Scholarship Program, Kazakhstan

Reference

1.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.

2.

Arthur, W. B. (1996). Increasing Returns and the New World of Business. Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 100-109.

3.

Brooks, S. (1989). Public Policy in Canada: An Introduction. Toronto, Ontario: McClelland and Stewart Inc.

4.

Cardona, M., Kretschmer, T., & Strobel, T. (2013). ICT and Productivity: Conclusions from the Empirical Literature. Information Economics and Policy, 25(3), 109-125.

5.

Chi, H. (2011) Interactive Digital Advertising VS. Virtual Brand Community: Exploratory Study of User Motivation and Social Media Marketing Responses in Taiwan, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12, 44-61.

6.

Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). A knowledge engineering approach to developing mind tools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54, 289-297.

7.

Craft, A., Jeffrey, B., & Leibling, M. (2007). Creativity in education. London, United Kingdom: Continuum.

8.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68.

9.

Katz, R. L., & Koutroumpis, P. (2013). Measuring Digitization: A Growth and Welfare Multiplier. Technovation, 33(10-11), 314-319.

10.

Kelly, L., Gayle K., & Judy D. (2010). Avoidance of Advertising in Social Networking Sites: The Teenage Perspective. Journal of Interacting Advertising, 10, 16-27.

11.

Kireyeva, A.A., Abilkayir, N.A., & Tsoy, A.A. (2018). A Study on the Distribution of Information and High Technology Clusters: Kazakhstan’s Experience. Journal Distribution of Science, 6(14), 5–15.

12.

Kuprevich, T.S. (2018). Digital platforms in the global economy: current trends and directions of development. Economic Bulletin of the University, 37(1), 311-318.

13.

Negroponte, N. (1996). Being Digital, New York: Knopf, 243 p.

14.

Prentice, R. (2000). Creativity: A reaffirmation of its place in early childhood education. The Curriculum Journal, 11(2), 145-156.

15.

Panshin, B. (2017). Digital economy: Features and trends. Science and innovation, 3 (157), 18-20.

16.

Pookulangara, S., & Kristian, K. (2011). Cultural Influence on Consumers’ Usage of Social Networks and its’Impact on Online Purchase Intentions. Journal of Retailing and Xonsumer Services, 18, 348-354.

17.

Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

18.

Sharp, C., & Le Metais, J (2000). The Arts, Creativity and Cultural Education. London: International Review of Curriculum and Assessment Frameworks.

19.

Sorokina, N. V., & Rogova, A.V. (2012). Case study in the study of students 'intercultural experience. Humanitarian vector, 1(29), 91-101.

20.

Steinkuehler, C., & Squire, K. (2009). Virtual Worlds and Learning. On the horizon, 17(1), 8-11.

21.

Tapscott, D. (1995). The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril In The Age of Networked Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, 342p.

22.

Varian, H. (2016). Intelligent Technology. Finance and Development, 53(3), 6-9.

23.

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies. Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York: Free Pres.

24.

Young, E., & Quinn, L. (2002). Writing Effective Public Policy papers: A Guide for Policy Advisers in Central and Eastern Europe. Open Society Institute, Budapest.

25.

Yudina, T.N., & Tushkanov, I.M. (2017). Digital economy through the prism of business philosophy and political economy, Economy philosophy, 1(109), 193-201.

26.

Zhang, T. (2012). The Internet of Things Promoting Higher Education Revolution. Fourth International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security, 790-793.

27.

Zhuravleva, E.Y. (2012). Development of research in the field of electronic social science// Sociological research, 7, 99-107.

The Journal of Distribution Science