- Log In/Sign Up
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS, ESCI
ISSN : 1738-3110
The Effects of Traditional Market Support Projects and Competition Intensity of Stores on Store Sales and Number of Visitors
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the government support project on traditional market and the interaction effect between the government support project and the competition intensity. Therefore, this study focuses on the competition intensity of individual stores in traditional markets, unlike the traditional research flow, which is beyond the competitive structure of traditional markets and large retailers. Research design, data, and methodology - This study is based on the data of 'Statistics of Traditional Market in 2017'. In this study, a multiple regression equation was constructed using the number of government support projects as an independent variable, competition intensity as an interaction, and sales per store, number of customers per store as a dependent variable for analysis. A multiple regression equation was constructed for the main effect analysis. To investigate the effect of the interaction, cohen(1980)'s regression equation and two-way ANOVA were used. Results - First, according to this study, the traditional market participated in the government support project showed that the sales and the number of visitors per store in the traditional market were higher than those in the non-participation market. Second, the impact of government support projects on sales per store(also number of visiting customers per store) can be different depending on the competition intensity. More specifically, if the market is politically supported by a market with a high level of competition, it may be more effective than the market with no support. Conclusions - Based on the results of the study, we suggested academic and practical implications and suggested that competition intensity of stores in the traditional market should be considered in the future. The implications of this study are as follows. First, the effects of the government's traditional market support project were analyzed empirically. Second, this study is different from the previous studies in that it examined the competitive strengths and the effects of individual stores in traditional markets, away from competition between traditional market and large retailers. Third, it provided practical implications for the operation of government support projects.
- keywords
- Retail Competition, Traditional Market, Competition Intensity, Support Projects
Reference
Belshaw, C. (1965), Traditional Exchange and Modern Market, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Borraz, F., Dubra, J., Ferres, D., & Zipitria, L. (2014). Supermarket Entry and the Survival of Small Stores. Review of Industrial Organization, 44(1), 73-93.
Bromley, R. J., Symansky, R., & Good. C. M. (1975), The Rationale of Periodic Markets. Annals of Association of American Geograohers, 65(4) 530-537.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences(2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Choi, D. R., & Suh, G. H. (2017). A Study on the Effects of Small Business Management Result by the Korean Government: Focus on SEMAS. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 7(3), 33-43.
Choo, M. J., & Jung, Y. S. (2015). Effects of Traditional Market Service Quality Factors on Customer Value, Relational Quality, and Behavioral Intention. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(11), 79-92.
Goldman, A., & Hino, H. (2005). Supermarkets vs. Traditional Retail Stores: Diagnosing the Barriers to Supermarkets’ Market Share Growth in an Ethnic Minority Community. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12(4), 273-284.
Grönroos, C. (1984). A service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36-44.
Hall, M., & Tideman, N. (1967). Measures of concentration. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(317), 162-168.
Jia, P. (2008). What Happens When Wal-Mart Comes to Town: An Empirical Analysis of the Discount Retailing Industry. Econometrica, 76(6), 1263-1316.
Kim, D. Y., & Kwon, S. K. (2013). A Study on the Korea Distribution Promotion Policy and Adjustment Policy. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(4), 89-97.
Kim, P. J. (2017a). A Study on the Recognition Level of Traditional Market Users on Return Intention. International Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 8(5), 77-85.
Kim, P. J. (2017b). The Analysis of the Factors in Customer Trust and Revisit Decision in Traditional Market. International Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 8(7), 71-81.
Kim, P. J., Kim, K. C., Seok, N. K., & Youn, M. K. (2009), A Study on the Customers' Awareness for Modernizing the Facilities of Traditional Market, Journal of Distribution Science, 7(1), 55-70.
Kim, S. C. (2004). A Study on the Competition Strategies for Traditional Market, Journal of Distribution Science, 2(2), 17-32.
Kim, Y. K., & Kim, S. H. (2013), A Study on the System Improvement Plan for an Efficient Market Maintenance Project, Journal of Distribution Science, 11(4), 23-35.
Kim, Y. K., Kang, H. S., & Kim, S. H. (2012), A Study of Efficient Measures for Installing and Managing Traditional Market Arcades, Journal of Distribution Science, 10(3), 15-30.
Kim, Y. K., Kim, S. H., & Lim, J. (2011), A Study on the Meaning & Classification of Conventional Markets, Journal of Distribution Science, 9(2), 83-95.
Kwon, O. C., Kim, J. S., Kim, P. J., Kim, P. J., Kim, H. S., Namkung, S., Park, Y. K., Park, C. J., Park, H. J., Youn, M. K., Lee, J. H., Hwang, H. C., & Kim, Y. O. (2007). A Note on the Unification on Retail Trade Terminology. Journal of Distribution Science, 5(2), 5-16.
Lee, C. S., Kim, J. H. Kim, Y. K., & Kim, S. H. (2018). A Study on Retail Competition Structure in Traditional Market. Journal of Distribution Science, 16(6), 55-63.
Lim, J., Kim, Y. K., Lee, M. K., Kim, Y. O., & Youn, M. K. (2011). Consideration of the Traditional Market-Related Law Revision Plan: Focus on Moranjang in Seongnam. Journal of Distribution Science, 9(2), 37-47.
Miller, C. E., Reardon, J., & McCorkle, D. E. (1999). The Effects of Competition on Retail Structure: An Examination of Intratype, Intertype, and Intercategory Competition. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 107-120.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). Servqual: A Multiple-item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
Park, C. J., & Jeong, T. S. (2011). A Study on Emergence of Innovative Retailing and Its Development Process. Journal of Distribution Science, 9(1), 29-38.
Porter, M. E. (1979). How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Strategic Planning: Readings, 102-117.
Shackleton, J. R. (1990). New Thinking in Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Small Enterprise and Market Service (2019). Statistics of Traditional Market in 2017. Retrieved February 25, 2019 from http://www.sbiz.or.kr/sup/custcenter/report/1211789_1716.jsp.
Watanabe, T. (2003), The Policy of Distribution, Tokyu, Japan: Chuo Keizaisha.
Yoo, S. W., & Lee, S. Y. (2011). A Study on the Competition Strategy for Private Super Market against Super Super Market. Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 2(2), 39-45.
Youn, M. K. Kim, Y. O., Lee, M. K., & Sok, N. K. (2006). Domestic Restrictions on the Opening of Retail Stores. Journal of Distribution Science, 4(1), 121-160.
Youn, M. K., & Kim, Y. O. (2017). Principles of Distribution (3rd ed.). Seoul, Korea: Dunam.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations