- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1738-3110
- E-ISSN2093-7717
- SCOPUS
ISSN : 1738-3110
Market Competition and Audit Quality in Distribution and Service Industries
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - This paper examines whether product market competition in distribution and service industries is related to audit quality. This paper investigates, specifically, the relationship in distribution and service industries by using Herfindahl-Hirschman Index and audit quality measured by audit fee and audit hour. Research design, data, and methodology - Using 1,011 firm-year observations of listed companies from 2002 to 2016 in distribution and service industries, this study examines whether product market competition in distribution and service industries is related to audit quality. Results - This study finds that market competition in distribution and service industries is negatively related to audit quality and this negative relation is pronounced for the firms with high outside director groups. Further analysis suggests that the relationship between market competition and audit hours is no longer significant. Conclusions - This study extended the existing scope of the audit quality study by systematically analyzing the impact of industrial-level characteristics (i.e. market competition) in the distribution service industries on audit quality. This study, in other words, suggests the regulatory body consider the industrial-level characteristics of each industry in order to enhance audit quality.
- keywords
- Product Market Competition, Audit Quality, Outside Director, Audit Fees, Audit Hours, Distribution and Service Industries
Reference
Alchian, A. (1950). Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58(3), 211-221.
Black, B., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2006). Predicting Firms’Corporate Governance Choices: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 660-691.
Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., Liu, X., & Simunic, D. A. (2008). Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4Premiums, Theory and Cross-country Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 55-99.
Datta, S., Iskandar-Datta, M., & Sharma, V. (2013). Product market power, industry structure and corporate earnings management. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(8), 3273-3285.
Deis, D. R. Jr., & Giroux, G. (1996). The effect of auditor changes on audit fees, audit hours, and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 15(1), 55-76.
Ettredge, M., Fuerherm, E. E., & Li, C. (2014). Fee pressure and audit quality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(4), 247-263.
Fama, E. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325
Francis, J. R., & Simon, D. T. (1987). A Test of Audit Pricing in the Small-Client Segment of the U.S. Audit Market. The Accounting Review, 62(1), 145-157.
Giroud, X., & Mueller, H. (1987). Corporate Governance, Product Market Competition, and Equity Prices. Journal of Finance, 66(2), 563-600.
Hart, O. (1983). The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme. Bell Journal of Economics, 14(2), 366-382.
Kim, J. B., Liu, X., & Zheng, L. (2012). The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Audit Fees: Theory and Evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 2061-2094.
Kwon, S. Y., Lim, Y., & Simnett, R. (2014). The Effect of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation on Audit Quality and Audit Fees: Empirical Evidence from the Korean Audit Market. The Accounting Review, 33(4), 167-196.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Agency Problem and Dividend Policies around the World. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1-33.
Palmrose, Z. V. (1986). Audit Fees and Auditor Size, Further Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97-110.
Schmidt, K. (1997). Managerial Incentives and Product Market Competition. Review of Economic Studies, 64(2), 191-213.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance, 52(7), 737-783.
Simunic, D. A. (1980). The Pricing of Audit Services, Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161-190.
Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1996). Impact of Litigation Risk on Audit Pricing: A Review of the Economics and the Evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15(Supplement), 119-134.
Vendrzyk, V. P., & Bagranoff, N. A. (2003). The evolving role of IS audit: A field study comparing the perceptions of IS and financial auditors. Advances in Accounting, 20, 141-163.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations