바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Empirical Study of the Korean Telecommunication Market and IoT Smart Home: Effects of Bundling Strategy on Consumers’ Responses

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2020, v.18 no.5, pp.15-23
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.5.202005.15
KIM, Hoik
KIM, Han-Min
LEE, Minhwan
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: This research focused on the fact that the Internet platform is integral to IoT products such as Smart home and studied consumer buying decisions when products are sold bundled with internet service. Contrary to the sales strategies of telecommunication companies, some companies sell IoT products alone, for example Google, Kakao, and Naver. In this market situation, the sales strategies of Korean telecommunication companies were analyzed with bundling theory and technology acceptance model, then it was conducted to figure out which sales and distribution strategies could affect consumers' purchase behavior. Research design, data, methodology: Data was collected by149 questionnaires from groups who are familiar with IoT smart home systems, then exploratory factor analysis and regression were used to analyze the research model. Results: The results revealed that the perceived ease of use and the perceived usefulness affect the purchase intention of IoT-based products; however, this effect was not found in the case of bundled products. In other words, it is found that selling and distributing Internet services and IoT products together does not affect consumers' purchases. Conclusion: It is suggested that Korean telecommunications companies' existing sales and distribution strategies for IoT products need to be changed according to its characteristics.

keywords
Product Bundling, Bundling Strategy, IoT Smart Home, Technology Acceptance Model(TAM), Telecommuniation Companies, Distribution Strategy

Reference

1.

Al-Ali, A. R., Zualkernan, I. A., Rashid, M., Gupta, R., &AliKarar, M. (2017). A smart home energy management system using IoT and big data analytics approach. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 63(4), 426-434.

2.

Arias, O., Wurm J., Hoang, K., & Jin, Y. (2015). Privacy and security in Internet of things and wearable devices. IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems, 1(2), 99-109.

3.

Bae, S. B., & Kim, G. J. (2015). A study on causal relation between experience on fashion products in augmented reality(AR) and intention to buy. Journal of Korean Animation Research, 11(32), 98-123.

4.

Bakos, Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1999). Bundling information goods: pricing, profits and efficiency. Management Science, 45(12), 1613-1630.

5.

Byun, S. E. (2018). Evaluating Information Technology Systems Using Consumer Surveys: The Role of Personal Product Knowledge. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(4), 117-125.

6.

Chen, M., Yang, J., Zhu, X., Wang, X., Liu, M., & Song, J. E. (2017). Smart Home 2.0: Innovative smart home system powered by botanical IoT and emotion detection. Mobile Networks and Applications, 22, 1159-1169.

7.

Chin, J. H., & Kim, M. J. (2017). A study on the effect on consumer‟s innovation, trust on sport wearable products:focused on extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Korean Tourism and Leisure Research, 29(7), 425-442.

8.

Chen, Y., & Shang, Y. F. (2018). Factors Influencing Users' Word-of-Mouth Intention Regarding Mobile Apps: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(1), 51-65.

9.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

10.

Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Gauravaram, P. (2017). Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home. Proceeding of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (pp.618-623). Kona, U.S.A.

11.

Eppen, G. D., Hanson, W. A., & Martin, R. K. (1991). Bundling:New products, new markets, low risk. Sloan Management Review, 32(4), 7-14.

12.

Gaur, A., Scotney, B., Parr, G., & McClean, S. (2015). Smart city architecture and its applications based on IoT. Procedia Computer Science, 52, 1089-1094.

13.

Gefen, D., & Starub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in is adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1), 8.

14.

Greene, S., Thapliyal, H., & Carpenter, D. (2016). IoT-based fall detection for smart home environments. Proceeding of 2016IEEE International Symposium on Nanoelectronic and Information Systems (pp.23-28). Gwalior, India.

15.

Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645-1660.

16.

Guiltian, J. P. (1987). The price bundling of service: a normative framework. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 74-85.

17.

Gu, W., Bao, P., & Lee, J. H. (2019). A Study on the Continuance Intention of O2O Fresh Agricultural Products E-Commerce. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 10(10), 35-44.

18.

Khanna, A., & Anand, R. (2016). IoT based smart parking system. Proceeding of 2016 International Conference on Internet of Things and Applications (pp.266-270). Pune, India.

19.

Kim, A. S., & Oh, Y. S. (2014). Evaluation of Functionality and Added Value Factors to the Usage of Mobile Telecommunication Services. Journal of Distribution Science, 12(9), 65-72.

20.

Kim, C. S., & Park, S. B. (2017). A Unified Model Combining Technology Readiness Acceptance Model and Technology Paradox Theory. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 8(7), 39-49.

21.

Kim, J. H., & Park, J. W. (2019). The Effect of Airport SelfService Characteristics on Passengers‟ Technology Acceptance and Behavioral Intention. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(5), 29-37.

22.

Kim, K. H., & Shim, J. H. (2018). Application and Policy Direction of Blockchain in Logistics and Distribution Industry. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(6), 77-85.

23.

Kim, Y. H., Park Y. J., & Choi, J. G. (2017). A study on the adoption of iot smart home service: using valued-based adoption model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9-10), 1149-1165.

24.

Kwon, J. E., & Lee, J. S. (2019). Usability Evaluation Scale for Product of Intelligent Homecare based on Retail Consumer. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(12), 55-62.

25.

Kwon, J. H. (2015). A Strategic Effect of Bundling on Product Distribution. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(10), 15-21.

26.

Lee, J. W., Becker, K., & Potluri, R. M. (2016). Antecedents of Corporate Adoption of Social Media and the Role of the Technology Acceptance Model in the Path. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 3(2), 67-76.

27.

Le, H. B. H., Ngo, C. T., Trinh, T. T. H., & Nguyen, T. T. P. (2020). Factor Affecting Customers' Decision to Use Mobile Banking Service: A Case of Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(2), 205-212.

28.

Mainetti, L., Mighali, V., & Patrono, L. (2015). An IoT-based user-centric ecosystem for heterogeneous smart home environments. Proceeding of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (pp.704-709). London, U.K.

29.

Mansur, D. M., Sule, E. T., Kartini, D., Oesmn, Y. M., Putra, A. H. P. K., & Chamidah, N. (2019). Moderating of the Role of Technology Theory to the Existence of Consumer Behavior on E-commerce. Journal of Distribution Science, 17(7), 15-25.

30.

Palfrey, T. R. (1983). Bundling decisions by a multiproduct monopolist with incomplete information. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society, 51(2), 463-483.

31.

Park, S. J., Ko, K. H., Kim, W. J., Choi, J. J., Park, C., Youn, D. Y., & Yang, J. S. (2019). The effect of quality of service of smart machine on user innovation and user intention using technology acceptance model. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies, 75, 267-278.

32.

Reinders, M. J., Frambach, R. T., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2010). Using product bundling to facilitate the adoption process of radical innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(7), 1127-1140.

33.

Ryu, J. S. (2019). Consumer Characteristics and Shopping for Fashion in the Omni-channel Retail Environment. Journal of Business, Economics and Environmental Studies, 9(4), 15-22.

34.

Samuel, S. S. I. (2016). A review of connectivity challenges in iotsmart home. Proceeding of 2016 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (pp.1-4). Muscat, Oman.

35.

Santoso, F. K., & Vun, N. C. H. (2015). Securing iot for smart home system. Proceeding of 2015 International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (pp.1-2). Madrid, Spain.

36.

Sheng, S., Parker, A. M., & Nakamoto, K. (2007). The effects of price discount and product complementarity on consumer evaluations of bundle components. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 53-64.

37.

Skouby, K. E., & Lynggaard, P. (2014). Smart home and smart city solutions enabled by 5G, IoT, AAI and CoT services. Proceeding of 2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (pp.874-878). Mysore, India.

38.

Wurm, J., Hoang, K., Arias, O., Sadeghi, A., & Jin, Y. (2016). Security analysis on consumer and industrial IoT devices. Proceeding of 2016 21st Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (pp.519-524). Macau, China.

39.

Yoo, H. S., Suh, E. K., & Kim, T. H. (2020). A Study on Technology Acceptance Elderly living Alone in Smart City Environment: Based on AI Speaker. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 11(2), 41-48.

The Journal of Distribution Science