바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Product Category and Shopping Options of Logistic Service Quality

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2020, v.18 no.8, pp.113-125
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.8.202008.113
KIM, Ok
CHEON, Hongsik J.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of interaction between product category (fresh vs. indulgent product) and shopping options (shipping charge and delivery time) on customer satisfaction and purchase intent in an e-commerce context. When ordering groceries online, consumers begin to allocate a larger share of their grocery budget toward product categories that generally contain healthier items at the expense of product categories that generally contain more indulgent products. Moreover, customers are extremely sensitive to shipping options such as shipping charges and delivery time. Therefore, this research investigates the issue at a more segmented level to focus on the impact that one dimension of logistics service quality - product category, shipping charge, and delivery time have on customer satisfaction and purchase intent. Research design, data, and methodology: To test the theoretically derived priori hypotheses concerning product category, shipping charges, delivery time, satisfaction, and purchase intent, this research presented a scenario-based experiment. Eight treatment groups were assigned by the method of product category (fresh produce vs. indulgent product), shipping charge (free vs. paid), and delivery time (one-day vs. two to three days). A total of 240 subjects were divided into groups and exposed to one of the eight scenarios. Participant's purchase intention was the dependent variable, and ANOVA and L-matrix were used to analyze for main and interactive effects between factors. Conclusions: Results indicated that in tests 1 and 2, free shipping and fast delivery time increased consumer satisfaction as well as purchase intent, and fast delivery moderated the impact of free shipping on consumer satisfaction and purchase intent. Test 3 showed that the effect of free shipping on consumer satisfaction and purchase intent moderated by fast delivery for indulgent products. In contrast, fast delivery for fresh products moderated the effect of paid shipping on consumer satisfaction and purchase intent. Consistent with this proposed mechanism, the relative importance of fresh produce versus indulgent products highlights the effect of shipping options on consumer satisfaction and purchase intent when ordering the target product in an e-commerce context. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.

keywords
Shipping, Charges, Delivery, Logistics, Service

Reference

1.

Acton, C., Miller, R., Maltby, J., & Fullerton, M. D. (2009). SPSS for social scientists. Macmillan International Higher Education.

2.

Alizadeh, F., & Lahiji, M. (2018). Suitable Delivery System in Small E-Commerce Companies. Journal of Humanities Insights, 2(4), 167-171.

3.

Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer,A., & Wood, S. (1997). Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 38-53.

4.

Bachrach, D. G., & Bendoly, E. (2011). Rigor in behavioral experiments: A basic primer for supply chain management researchers. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(3), 5-8.

5.

Barsh, J., Crawford, B., & Grosso, C. (2000). How E-tailing Can Rise from the Ashes. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3(1), 98-109.

6.

Bienstock, C. C., Mentzer, J. T., & Bird, M. M. (1997). Measuring Physical Distribution Service Quality. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 25(4), 31-44.

7.

Cha, S. S. & Seo, B. J. (2019). The effect of brand trust of home meal replacement on repurchasing in online shopping. Journal of Business, Economics, and Environmental Studies (JBEES), 9(3), 21-26.

8.

Chandran, S. and Morwitz, V.G. (2006). The price of freedom:customer sensitivity to promotions with negative contextual influences. Journal of Customer Research, 33(3), 384-392.

9.

Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations for Online Retail Shopping Behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511-535.

10.

Choi, N & Chen, F. (2020). The Effects of Goal Orientation Consciousness versus Unconsciousness on Consumers’Choice Tendency. Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business (IJIDB), 11(1), 7-17.

11.

Collier, J. E., & Bienstock, C. C. (2006). Measuring service quality in e-retailing. Journal of Service Research, 8(3), 260-275.

12.

Dabholkar, P. A. (1994). Incorporating choice into an attitudinal framework: analyzing models of mental comparison processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 100-118.

13.

Dhebar, A. (2013). Toward a compelling customer touchpoint architecture. Business Horizons, 56(2), 199-205.

14.

Green, S. B., Marquis, J. G., Hershberger, S. L., Thompson, M. S.,& McCollam, K. M. (1999). The over-parameterized analysis of variance model. Psychological Methods, 4(2), 214-233.

15.

Gümüş, M., Li, S., Oh, W. and Ray, S. (2013). Shipping fees or shipping free? A tale of two price partitioning strategies in online retailing. Production and Operations Management, 22(4), 758-776.

16.

Hamilton, R. W., & Srivastava, J. (2008). When 2+ 2 is not the same as 1+ 3: Variations in price sensitivity across components of partitioned prices. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(4), 450-461.

17.

Harlam, B. A., Krishna, A., Lehmann, D. R., & Mela, C. (1995). Impact of bundle type, price framing and familiarity on purchase intention for the bundle. Journal of Business Research, 33(1), 57-66.

18.

Harris, K. A. (2019). People Make Healthier Choices When Buying Online. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 32.

19.

Innis, D. E., & La Londe, B. J. (1994). Modelling the effects of customer service performance on purchase intentions in the channel. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2(2), 45-60.

20.

Kamins, M. A., Folkes, V. S., & Fedorikhin, A. (2009). Promotional bundles and consumers’ price judgments: When the best things in life are not free. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 660-670.

21.

Keeney, R. L. (1999). The value of Internet commerce to the customer. Management Science, 45(4), 533-542.

22.

Kleijnen, M., De Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2007). An assessment of value creation in mobile service delivery and the moderating role of time consciousness. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 33-46.

23.

Kumar, V. (2018). Transformative Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 82(4), 1-12.

24.

Lee, K., Choi, J., & Li, Y. J. (2014). Regulatory focus as a predictor of attitudes toward partitioned and combined pricing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 355-362.

25.

Laibson, D. (2001). A cue-theory of consumption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 81-119.

26.

Lewis, M. (2006). The effect of shipping fees on customer acquisition, customer retention, and purchase quantities. Journal of Retailing, 82(1), 13-23.

27.

Li, H., & Dinlersoz, E. (2012). Quality-based price discrimination:evidence from internet retailers’ shipping options. Journal of Retailing, 88(2), 276-290.

28.

Liu, L., Parlar, M., & Zhu, S. X. (2007). Pricing and lead time decisions in decentralized supply chains. Management Science, 53(5), 713-725.

29.

Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272-292.

30.

Ma, S. (2017). Fast or free shipping options in online and Omnichannel retail? The mediating role of uncertainty on satisfaction and purchase intentions. International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(4), 1099-1122.

31.

Mentzer, J. T., Flint, D. J., & Hult, G. T. M. (2001). Logistics service quality as a segment-customized process. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 82-104.

32.

Meyer, R. (2018). Reflections on Transformative Marketing: The Next 20 Years. Journal of Marketing, 82(4), 13–14.

33.

Nguyen, D. H., de Leeuw, S., Dullaert, W., & Foubert, B. P.(2019). What is the right delivery option for you? Consumer preferences for delivery attributes in online retailing. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(4), 299-321.

34.

Palmeira, M. M., & Srivastava, J. (2013). Free offer ≠ cheap product: A selective accessibility account on the valuation of free offers. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 644-656.

35.

Rabinovich, E., & Bailey, J. P. (2004). Physical distribution service quality in Internet retailing: service pricing, transaction attributes, and firm attributes. Journal of Operations Management, 21(6), 651-672.

36.

Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2009). Job-satisfaction inorganizational research. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 196–212). London, UK: Sage.

37.

Rungtusanatham, M., Wallin, C., & Eckerd, S. (2011). The vignette in a scenario‐based role‐playing experiment. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(3), 9-16.

38.

Ryu, J. S. (2019). Is Consumer Characteristics and Shopping for Fashion in the Omni-channel Retail Environment. Journal of Business, Economics, and Environmental Studies (JBEES), 9(4), 15-22.

39.

Schindler, R. M., Morrin, M., & Bechwati, N. N. (2005). Shipping charges and shipping‐charge skepticism:Implications for direct marketers' pricing formats. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(1), 41-53.

40.

Shang, W., Liu L. (2011). Promised Delivery Time and Capacity Games in Time-based Competition, Management Science, 57(3), 599–610.

41.

Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict:The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278-292.

42.

Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (2002). Spontaneous versus controlled influences of stimulus-based affect on choice behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(2), 342-370.

43.

Smith, M. & Brynjolfsson, E. (2001). Customer Decision-Making at an Internet Shopbot. Journal of Industrial Economics, 78(4), 102-141.

44.

Sopadjieva, E., Dholakia, U. M., & Benjamin, B. (2017). A study of 46,000 shoppers shows that omnichannel retailing works. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 2-4.

45.

Szalai, I. S. (2018). The Prevalence of Consumer Arbitration Agreements by America's Top Companies. UC Davis L. Rev., 52(1), 233-259.

46.

Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8(3), 201-207.

47.

Vaidyanathan, G., & Devaraj, S. (2008). The role of quality in eprocurement performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 407-425.

48.

Verhoef, P. C., Kannan, P. K., & Inman, J. J. (2015). From multichannel retailing to omni-channel retailing: introduction to the special issue on multi-channel retailing. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 174-181.

49.

Vickery, S. K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C., & Calantone, R. (2003). The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), 523-539.

50.

Wang, X. T. (1996). Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(2), 145-157.

51.

Wei, G. U., & Peng, B. A. O. (2019). A study on the continuance intention of O2O fresh agricultural products e-commerce. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business (IJIDB), 10(10), 35-44.

52.

Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1-15.

53.

Youn, M. K., Kim, Y. O., Lee, M. K., & Namkung, S. (2006). Domestic restrictions on the opening of retail stores. Journal of Distribution Science, 6(2), 121-160.

The Journal of Distribution Science