Gender Diversity, Institutional Ownership and Earning Management: Case on Distribution Industry in Indonesia

ZUBAIDAH, Siti (Accounting Department, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang)
IRAWAN, Dwi (Accounting Department, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang)
SUMARWIJAYA, Sumarwijaya (Accounting Department, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang)
WIDYASTUTI, Aviani (Accounting Department, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang)
ARISANTI, Ike (Accounting Department, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang)

ZUBAIDAH, Siti, IRAWAN, Dwi, SUMARWIJAYA, Sumarwijaya, WIDYASTUTI, Aviani, & ARISANTI, Ike. (2021). Gender Diversity, Institutional Ownership and Earning Management: Case on Distribution Industry in Indonesia. The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS), 19(11), 17-25, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.11.202111.17

복사

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine the effect of gender diversity and institutional ownership on earnings management in distribution industry sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2018. Research design, data and methodology: This research is case study research, where the population in this study are all distribution sub-sector companies listed on the IDX in 2017-2018. The sample selection technique used was purposive sampling and obtained 74 companies with the 2017-2018 research period. Multiple linear regression analysis was used in this study, using Stata 17. Results: The results of this study indicate that: 1) Gender diversity has a negative effect on earnings management. 2) Institutional ownership has a negative effect on earnings management. Conclusions: This study contributes to the agency theory where gender diversity and institutional ownership can reduce the agency conflict that the shrinkage of earnings management. These results indicate that companies in which there are female directors will reduce earnings management practices, this is due to the attitude of female directors who tend to avoid risk. The results also show that institutional ownership will also lead to reduced levels of earnings management, because institutional investors will increase its oversight of the company.

keywords: Gender Diversity, Institusional Ownership, Earning Management, Agency Theory, Distribution Industry

참고문헌

Ajay, R., & Madhumathi, R. (2015). Institutional ownership and earnings management in India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 8(2), 119-136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0974686215602368

Akhigbe, A., McNulty, J. E., & Stevenson, B. A. (2013). How does transparency affect bank financial performance? International Review of Financial Analysis, 29, 24-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2013.01.007

Almazan, A., Hartzell, J. C., & Starks, L. T. (2005). Active institutional shareholders and costs of monitoring: Evidence from executive compensation. Financial management, 34(4), 5-34.

Anwar, H., & Buvanendra, S. (2019). Earnings Management and Ownership Structure: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Colombo Business Journal, 10(1). 44-65. doi:http://doi.org/10.4038/cbj.v10i1.42

Baek, C. W. (2017). The Effect of E-Business on Firm's Growth and Profitability in the Distribution Industry. The Journal of Distribution Science, 15(1), 123-130. doi:https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.15.1.201701.123

Balsam, S., Bartov, E., & Marquardt, C. (2002). Accruals management, investor sophistication, and equity valuation:Evidence from 10–Q filings. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 987-1012.

Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The quarterly journal of economics, 116(1), 261-292. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.139415

Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2016). Agency theory and bounded self-interest. Academy of management review, 41(2), 276-297. doi: doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0420

Cahan, S. F. (1992). The effect of antitrust investigations on discretionary accruals: A refined test of the political-cost hypothesis. The Accounting Review, 67(1), 77-95.

10.

Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2008). Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management. Journal of financial economics, 87(2), 357-373. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.03.003

11.

Fan, Y., Jiang, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Women on boards and bank earnings management: From zero to hero. Journal of Banking Finance, 107, 105607. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105607

12.

Gul, F. A., Fung, S. Y. K., & Jaggi, B. (2009). Earnings quality:Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and auditors’industry expertise. Journal of accounting and Economics, 47(3), 265-287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.03.001

13.

Gull, A. A., Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., & Chtioui, T. (2018). Beyond gender diversity: How specific attributes of female directors affect earnings management. The British Accounting Review, 50(3), 255-274. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.001

14.

Hall, S. C., & Stammerjohan, W. W. (1997). Damage awards and earnings management in the oil industry. The Accounting Review, 72(1), 47-65.

15.

Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of accounting economics, 7(1-3), 85-107.

16.

Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting horizons, 13(4), 365-383. doi:https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365

17.

Jalil, A. A., & Rahman, R. A. (2010). Institutional investors and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Journal of Financial Reporting Accounting, 8(2), 110-127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/19852511011088370

18.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm:Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

19.

Karjalainen, J. (2011). Audit quality and cost of debt capital for private firms: Evidence from Finland. International journal of auditing, 15(1), 88-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2010.00424.x

20.

Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of accounting economics, 39(1), 163-197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002

21.

Kouaib, A., & Almulhim, A. (2019). Earnings manipulations and board's diversity: The moderating role of audit. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 30(2), 100356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2019.100356

22.

Lemma, T. T., Negash, M., Mlilo, M., & Lulseged, A. (2018). Institutional ownership, product market competition, and earnings management: Some evidence from international data. Journal of Business Research, 90, 151-163. doi:doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.035

23.

Levi, M., Li, K., & Zhang, F. (2014). Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 185-200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.005

24.

Mulford, C., & Comiskey, E. (1996). Financial Warnings:Detecting Earning Surprises, Avoiding Business Troubles, Implementing Corrective Strategies: New York: Wiley &Sons.

25.

Orazalin, N., & Akhmetzhanov, R. (2019). Earnings management, audit quality, and cost of debt: evidence from a Central Asian economy. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(6), 696-721. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2017-1730

26.

Ramalingegowda, S., Utke, S., & Yu, Y. (2020). Common Institutional Ownership and Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(1), 208-241. doi:https://10.1111/1911-3846.12628

27.

Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2000). Accounting and the investment opportunity set: Greenwood Publishing Group.

28.

Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem. The American economic review, 63(2), 134-139.

29.

Scott, W. R., & O'Brien, P. C. (2003). Financial accounting theory (Vol. 3): Prentice hall Toronto.

30.

Hyde, J. S., & Kling, K. C. (2001). Women, motivation, and achievement. Psychology of women quarterly, 25(4), 364-378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00035

31.

Subramanyam, K. (1996). The pricing of discretionary accruals. Journal of accounting, 22(1-3), 249-281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(96)00434-X

32.

Tierney, H. (1999). Women's studies encyclopedia (Vol. 1):greenwood publishing group.

33.

Umer, R., Abbas, N., Hussain, S., & Naveed, N. (2020). The Gender Diversity and Earning Management Practices:Evidence from Pakistan. City University Research Journal, 10(2). 342-357.

34.

Vinten, G., Sevin, S., & Schroeder, R. (2005). Earnings management: evidence from SFAS No. 142 reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(1). 47-54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510570696

35.

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

36.

Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of financial economics, 20, 431-460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90053-0

37.

Zimmerman, J. L. (2013). Myth: External financial reporting quality has a first-order effect on firm value. Accounting Horizons, 27(4), 887-894. doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-10370

38.

Zimmerman, W. R. L., & Jerold, L. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Years Perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131-156.

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.19 No.11

Gender Diversity, Institutional Ownership and Earning Management: Case on Distribution Industry in Indonesia

Gender Diversity, Institutional Ownership and Earning Management: Case on Distribution Industry in Indonesia

Abstract

참고문헌

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)