바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

An Analysis on the Logistics Efficiency of Shanghai Port for Global Supply Chain

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2021, v.19 no.7, pp.29-39
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.7.202107.29
SHENG, Yi-Peng
KIM, Yong-Jeong
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: As China experienced a crisis due to Covid-19, the global supply chain collapsed and affected the world. Therefore, it is time for a change in port operational efficiency, increasing in importance with changes in the global supply chain. This study analyzed Shanghai Port's efficiency, the world's largest port and representative hub port in Northeast Asia, by looking at the relationship between facility factors and cargo throughput to present hub port development's timely implications. Research design, data and methodology: This study applied the Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes (CCR) and Banker, Chames, and Cooper (BCC) models of the data development analysis (DEA) to construct an analysis from the input-oriented and output-oriented perspectives. Results: As a result, Yidong Container Terminal can be considered the most optimized in facilities and operation processes. Yidong and Shengdong Container Terminal should maintain current operating levels, while Pudong Container Terminal should review facility investments. Also, Zhendong, Huong, Mingdong, and Guandong Container Terminal should be reviewed to increase cargo throughput or to adjust current input variables in the current state. Conclusions: Therefore, the utilization of the container terminal input variables should be reviewed, and the factors of inefficiency should be improved. Moreover, the strategic focus of container terminal operations should be on increasing annual cargo throughput.

keywords
Container Terminal, DEA, Efficiency, Logistics, Port

Reference

1.

Ablanedo-Rosas, J. H., Gao, H., Zheng, X., Alidaee, B., & Wang, H. (2010). A study of the relative efficiency of Chinese ports:a financial ratio‐based data envelopment analysis approach. Expert Systems, 27(5), 349-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j

2.

Ahmed, A. S., & Mohamed, A. E. (2019). Assessing the Middle East top container ports relative technical efficiency. Pomorski zbornik, 56(1), 59-72. https://hrcak.srce.hr/224135

3.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1031-1142. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078

4.

BBC NEWS (2021). Egypt's Suez Canal blocked by huge container ship. March 24thEdition. https://www.bbc.com

5.

Boussofinance, A., Dyson, R. G., & Thanassoulis, E. (1991). Applied data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operations Research, 52(1), 1-15. doi.org/10.1016/0377

6.

Charnes, A., Clark, C. T., Cooper, W. W., & Golany, B. (1984). A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. air force. Annals of Operations Research, 2(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874734

7.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. L. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/

8.

Chen, S. H., Dowall, D. E., & Song, D. W. (2010). Evaluating impacts of institutional reforms on port efficiency changes:Ownership, corporate structure, and total factor productivity changes of world container ports. Transportation Research Part E, 46(4), 546-561. https://doi.org/10.1016

9.

Chudasama, K. M. (2010). Shipbuilding Infrastructure: An efficie ncy analysis of Indian shipyards. IUP Journal of Infrastructur e, 8(3), 7-22.

10.

Cullinane, K., & Wang, T. (2010). The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches. OR Spectrum, 32(3), 717-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/

11.

Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100

12.

Fitzsimmons, J. A., & Fitzsimmons, M. J. (1994). Service Management for Competitive Advantage. NY: McGrow-Hill College.

13.

Kim, H. S., & Park, J. R. (2013). An analysis of the operational efficiency of the major airports worldwide using DEA and M almquist productivity indices. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(8), 5-14. https://www.koreascience.or.kr

14.

Kim, J. H. (2017). Studies on port development strategy in Shanghai, China. Journal of Distribution Science, 15(1), 7-14. https://www.koreascience.or.kr

15.

Kim, J. H. (2016). Public private partnerships in Chinese port as infrastructure. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(7), 45-52. https://www.koreascience.or.kr

16.

Kuo, K. C., Lu, W. M., & Le, M. H. (2020). Exploring the performance and competitiveness of Vietnam port industry using DEA. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(3), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.10

17.

Wang, C. N., Nguyen, N. A. T., Fu, H. P., Hsu, H. P., & Dang, T. T.(2021). Efficiency assessment of seaport terminal operators using DEA Malmquist and Epsilon-Based Measure models. Axioms, 10(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020048

18.

Wu, Y. C. J., & Goh, M. (2010). Container port efficiency in emerging and more advanced markets, Transportation Research Part E, 46(6), 1030-1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/

19.

Zarbi, S., Shin, S. H., & Shin, Y. J. (2019). An analysis by Window DEA on the influence of international sanction to the efficiency of Iranian container ports. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 35(4), 163-171. https://doi.org/10

The Journal of Distribution Science