바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Quantitative Analysis: Team management for Better Employee Performance in the US Retail Supply Chain

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2021, v.19 no.7, pp.19-27
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.7.202107.19
KANG, Eungoo
HWANG, Hee-Joong

Abstract

Purpose: Former research has argued that organizations in distribution channels face several issues to make a better team-based system. The purpose of the present research is to measure between employee's job performance and three major issues which disturb a solid team system. Research design, data and methodology: Scant past studies are available to guide for team practitioners which elements should be eliminated to improve team performance. To achieve this goal, the present authors obtained 267 US workers in distribution channels and conducted ANOVA test to measure the relationship between three team issues (Free-rider, Trust, and Communication) and job performance. Results: Our statistical findings clearly suggests that there was a statistically recognizable difference at the significance level of probability between the mean value of employees' job performance and three major issues, showing the high degree of job performance can be occurred by eliminating three major team issues. Conclusions: Therefore, the present research concludes that it is necessary that team-based management in the supply chain should focus on removing free-rider issues and also adopt open communication lines to overcome team-building challenges due to communication. Above all else, the ability to increase trust can be enhanced via task delegation and more team members' engagement.

keywords
Team Performance, Supply Chain Management, Organizational Structure

Reference

1.

Bang, H., & Midelfart, T. N. (2017). What characterizes effective management teams? A research-based approach. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 69(4), 334-359.

2.

Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010). Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity and innovation management, 19(4), 332-345.

3.

Bowra, Z. A., Sharif, B., Saeed, A., & Niazi, M. K. (2012). Impact of human resource practices on employee perceived performance in banking sector of Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 6(1), 323-332.

4.

Brock, D., Abu-Rish, E., Chiu, C. R., Hammer, D., Wilson, S., Vorvick, L., & Zierler , B. (2013). Republished:Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety. The postgraduate medical journal, 89(1057), 642-651.

5.

Browne, W., Dreitlein, S., Ha, M., Manzoni, J., & Mere, A.(2016). Two Key Success Factors for Global Project Team Leadership: Communications and Human Resource Management. Journal of Information Technology &Economic Development, 7(2), 40-48.

6.

De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., & Gillespie, N. (2016). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of applied psychology, 101(8), 1134-1150.

7.

Den Otter, A., & Emmitt, S. (2007). Exploring effectiveness of team communication. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(5), 408-419.

8.

Dingel, M. J., Wei, W., & Huq, A. (2013). Cooperative Learning and Peer Evaluation: The Effect of Free Riders on Team Performance and the Relationship between Course Performance and Peer Evaluation. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 45-56.

9.

Fulk, H. K., Bell, R. L., & Bodie, N. (2011). Team management by objectives: Enhancing developing teams' performance. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 12(3), 17-26.

10.

Haas, M. R. (2010). The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 989-1008.

11.

Kameda, T., Tsukasaki, T., Hastie, R., & Berg, N. (2011). Democracy under uncertainty: The wisdom of crowds and the free-rider problem in group decision making. Psychological Review, 118(1), 76-96.

12.

Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2017). Team Management for Better Performance that Sells to Customers: Aligning the Stars. The Journal of Distribution Science, 15(7), 19-24.

13.

Kim, J. H. (2018). Do Teams Perform Better than Singles?:Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry in Korea. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(1), 9-23.

14.

Lee, P., Gillespie, N., Mann, L., & Wearing, A. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Management Learning, 41(4), 473-491.

15.

Lin, C. P., Baruch, Y., & Shih, W. C. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and team performance: The mediating role of team efficacy and team self-esteem. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 167-180.

16.

Mach, M., Dolan, S., & Tzafrir, S. (2010). The differential effect of team members' trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 771-794.

17.

McMillan, J. (1979). The free‐rider problem: a survey. Economic Record, 55(2), 95-107.

18.

Mellizo, P. (2013). Can group-incentives without participation survive the free-rider problem? A view from the lab. Sharing Ownership, Profits, and Decision-Making in the 21st Century. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

19.

Melo, C. D. O., Cruzes, D. S., Kon, F., & Conradi, R. (2013). Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management. Information and software Technology, 55(2), 412-427.

20.

Na, D. M., Park, S. H., & Kwak, W. J. (2018). The demographic faultline is a new situational factor for team management: The effect of leader teamwork behaviors on support for innovation. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 5(4), 149-160.

21.

Raes, A. M., Heijltjes, M. G., Glunk, U., & Roe, R. A. (2011). The interface of the top management team and middle managers: A process model. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 102-126.

22.

Russell, S. M., Funke, G. J., Knott, B. A., & Strang, A. J. (2012). Recurrence quantification analysis used to assess team communication in simulated air battle management. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 468-472.

23.

Ryu, B. H., & Lee, S. I. (2016). A Study of Precedence and Result Factors on Team Commitment on Distribution and Hotel Employees. The Journal of Distribution Science, 14(2), 113-121.

24.

Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences team performance. Journal of applied psychology, 96(4), 863-871.

25.

Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of applied psychology, 96(5), 981-1003.

26.

Sudharshan, D., & Sanchez, R. (1998). Distribution equity:creating value through managing knowledge relationships with distribution channels. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 2(4), 309-338.

27.

Thavikulwat, P., & Chang, J. (2012). Two free-rider-accepting methods of organizing groups for a business game. In Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference (Vol. 39).

28.

Tzafrir, S. S., & Dolan, S. L. (2004). Trust me: A scale for measuring manager‐employee trust. Management Research, 2(2), 115-132.

29.

Warkentin, M., & Beranek, P. M. (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Information systems journal, 9(4), 271-289.

30.

Wheelen, T. L., Hunger, J. D., Hoffman, A. N., & Bamford, C. E. (2017). Strategic management and business policy. Boston, MA: Pearson.

31.

Wiersema, M. F., & Bird, A. (2017). Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management, 36(5), 996-1025.

The Journal of Distribution Science