바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

Distribution of Personal Income on Donating Behavior: Application of Theory of Planned Behaviors

Distribution of Personal Income on Donating Behavior: Application of Theory of Planned Behaviors

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2021, v.19 no.8, pp.57-67
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.8.202108.57
Martaleni, Martaleni (Faculty of Economics and Business, Gajayana University)
YASA, Ni Nyoman Kerti (Faculty of Economics and Business, Udayana University)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explain the application of TPB and personal happiness on donation behavior and willingness to donate. Research design, data, and methodology: The population of this research is people in Indonesia who have a tendency in its culture to donate. The sample size used was 245 people with a purposive sampling method. The analysis technique used is Path Analysis using SEM-PLS. Result: The results show that the subjective norm had appositive and significant effect on attitude to donate; subjective norm has appositive and significant effect on the donation behavior. Personal happiness has a positive and significant effect on attitude to donate, and personal happiness also has a positive and significant effect on the donation behavior, and the donation behavior has a positive and significant effect on the attitude to donate. Conclusions: Being a responsible person to other people's conditions, as you see other people needing help, you will feel that you have the power to help them. you are often helping people in need, which concludes you are a compassionate person.

keywords
Distribution of Personal Income, Subjective Norm, Personal Happiness, Attitude, Donation Behavior

참고문헌

1.

Agarwal, P. (2019). Theory of Reasoned Action and Organic Food Buying in India. Srusti Management Review, 12(2), 28–37. http://srustimanagementreview.ac.in/paper_detail.php?id=MzU2

2.

Ahn, J. chang, Sura, S., & An, J. C. (2018). Intention to donate via social network sites (SNSs): A comparison study between Malaysian and South Korean users. Information Technology and People, 31(4), 910–926. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-12-2015-0307

3.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

4.

Auten, G. E., Clotfelter, C. T., & Schmalbeck, R. L. (2002). Taxes and philanthropy among the wealthy. In Slemrod, J. B. (Ed.), Does atlas shrug? The economic consequences of taxing the rich (pp. 392–424), Massachusetts, UK: Harvard University Press.

5.

Bananuka, J., Kasera, M., Najjemba, G.M., Musimenta, D., Ssekiziyivu, B., & Kimuli, S.N.L. (2020). Attitude: mediator of subjective norm, religiosity and intention to adopt Islamic banking. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(1), 81-96.https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2018-0025

6.

Barrett, L.F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K.N., & Gross, J.J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373-403. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709

7.

Barsade, S.G. (2002). The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644-675. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F3094912

8.

Benediktson, M. N. (2018). Investigating the U-shaped charitable giving profile using register-based data. COHERE discussion paper (pp.1-38), Odense, Denmark: University of Southern Denmark

9.

Chang, C. (2014). Guilt regulation: the relative effects of altruistic versus egoistic appeals for charity advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(3), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.853632

10.

Charbonneau, J., Cloutier, M.S., & Carrier, E. (2016). Why do blood donors lapse or reduce their donation’s frequency. Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 30(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2015.12.001

11.

Charseatd, P. (2016). Role of religious beliefs in blood donation behavior by distributing personal income among the youngster in Iran: a theory of planned behavior perspective. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 7(3), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2014-0037

12.

Chen, Y., Dai, R., Yao, J., & Li, Y. (2019). Donate time or money? The determinants of donation intention in online crowdfunding. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(16), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164269

13.

De Cannie`re, M.H., De Pelsmacker, P., & Geuens, M. (2009). Relationship quality and the theory of planned behavior models of behavioral intentions and purchase behavior. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.001

14.

Faqah, A., Moiz, B., Shahid, F., Ibrahim, M., & Raheem, A. (2015). Assessment of blood donation intention among medical students in Pakistan-an application of theory of planned behavior. Transfusion & Apheresis Science, 53(3), 353-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2015.07.003

15.

Ghazali, E., Soon, P.C., Mutum, D. S., & Nguyen, B. (2017). Health and cosmetics: Investigating consumers’ values for buying organic personal care products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 39, 154-163. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v39y2017icp154-163.html

16.

Hameed, I., Waris, I., & Amin Ul Haq, M. (2019). Predicting ecoconscious consumer behavior using theory of planned behavior in Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15), 15535-15547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04967-9

17.

Hyde, M.K., & White, K.M. (2009). To be a donor or not to be? Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to predict posthumous organ donation intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(4), 880-900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00464.x

18.

Hill, R.J., Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Contemporary Socialogy, 6(2), 244-245. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065853

19.

Holdershaw. J., Gendall, P., & Wright, M. (2011). Predicting blood donation behaviour: further application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Social Marketing, 1(2), 120 –132. https://doi.org/10.1108/20426761111141878

20.

James, R. N., & Sharpe, D. L. (2007). The nature and causes of the U-shaped charitable giving profile. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 218–238. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0899764006295993

21.

Jencks, C. (1987). Who gives to what? In Powell, W. W. (Ed.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (pp. 321–339), London, UK: Yale University Press.

22.

Kashif, M., Sarifuddin, S., & Hassan, A. (2015). Charity donation:intentions and behavior. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 33(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-07-2013-0110

23.

Kasri, R. A., & Chaerunnisa, S. R. (2021). The role of knowledge, trust, and religiosity in explaining the online cash waqf amongst Muslim millennials. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2020-0101

24.

Kasri, R.A., & Ramli, U.H. (2019). Why do Indonesian Muslims donate through mosques? A theory of planned behaviour approach. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 12(5), 663-679. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2018-0399

25.

Knowles, S.R., Hyde, M.K., & White, K.M. (2012). Predictors of young people’s charitable intentions to donate money: an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2096-2110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00932.x

26.

Lee, S., Winterich, K.P., & Ross, W.T. (2014). I’m moral, but I won’t help you: the distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 678-696. https://doi.org/10.1086/677226

27.

Liu, C., Bao, Z., & Zheng, C. (2019). Exploring consumers’purchase intention in social commerce: an empirical study based on trust, argument quality, and social presence. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(2), 378-397. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2018-0170

28.

Liu, L., Suh, A., & Wagner, C. (2018). Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study on individual donation behavior by distributing personal income in charitable crowdfunding. Internet Research, 28(3), 623-651. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2017-0240

29.

Martin, S., Greiling, D., & Leibetseder, N. (2017). Effects of word-of-mouth on the behavior of Austrian blood donors: a case study of the Red Cross blood donation service. Health Promotion International, 34(3), 429-439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dax086

30.

Martín-Santana, J.D., & Beerli-Palacio, A. (2012). Achieving donor repetition and motivation by block leaders among current blood donors. Transfusion and Apheresis Science, 47(3), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2012.05.015

31.

Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2017). Underdog entrepreneurs:a model of challenge–based entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fetap.12253

32.

Muhamad, N., Khamarudin, M., & Fauzi, W.I.M. (2019). The role of religious motivation in an international consumer boycott. British Food Journal, 121(1), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2018-0118

33.

Nesbit, R. (2012). The influence of major life cycle events on volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1153-1174. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0899764011429181

34.

Neumayr, M., & Pennerstorfer, A. (2021). The Relation Between Income and Donations as a Proportion of Income Revisited:Literature Review and Empirical Application. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(3), 551–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020977667

35.

Ng, T.W.Y., Cowling, B.J., So, H.C., Ip, D.K.M., & Liao, Q. (2020). Testing an integrative theory of health behavioural change for predicting seasonal influenza vaccination uptake among healthcare workers. Vaccine, 38(3), 690-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.041

36.

Otto, P.E., & Bolle, F. (2011). Multiple facets of altruism and their influence on blood donation. The Journal of SocioEconomics, 40(5),558-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.04.010.

37.

Paramita, W., Septianto, F., Rostiani, R., Winahjoe, S., & Audita, H. (2020). Turning narcissists into prosocial agents:explaining young people’s online donation behavior by distributing personal income. Young Consumers, 21(4), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-11-2019-1070

38.

Pham, Q.T., Dang, N.M., & Nguyen, D.T. (2020). Factors affecting on the digital piracy behavior: an empirical study in Vietnam. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762020000200108

39.

Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22(3), 218-233. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2

40.

Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (1995). Do the poor pay more: Is the U-shaped curve correct? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F089976409502400109

41.

Schervish, P. G., Havens, J. J. (1998). Embarking on a republic of benevolence? New survey findings on charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(2), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0899764098272007

42.

Schervish, P. G., O’Herlihy, M. A., & Havens, J. J. (2002). Charitable giving: How much, by whom, to what, and how. In Powell, W. W., Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 542–567), London, UK:Yale University Press.

43.

Schreiber, G.B., Schlumpf, K.S., Glynn, S.A., Wright, D.J., Tu, Y., King, M.R., Higgins, M., Kessler, D., Gilcher, R., Nass, C.C., & Guiltinan, A. (2006). Convenience, the bane of our existence, and other barriers to donating. Transfusion, 46(4), 545-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00757.x

44.

Septianto, F., Tjiptono, F., Paramita, W., & Chiew T.M., (2020). The interactive effects of religiosity and recognition in increasing donation. European Journal of Marketing, 55(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-04-2019-0326

45.

Sharps, D. L., & Schroeder, J. (2019). The preference for distributed helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(5), 954–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000179

46.

Shehu, E., Langmaack, A.C., Felchle, E., & Clement, M. (2015). Profiling donors of blood, money, and time. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(3), 269-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21126

47.

Smith, J.R., & McSweeney, A. (2007). Charitable giving: the effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behavior. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(5), 363-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.906

48.

Soliman, M., & Boenigk, S. (2019). Individual life events and blood giving. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(7), 926–938. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2018-2588

49.

Wang, T., Li, Y., Kang, M., & Zheng, H. (2019). Exploring individuals’ behavioral intentions toward donation crowdfunding: evidence from China. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1515-1534. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2018-0451

50.

Warburton, J., & Terry, D.J. (2000). Volunteer Decision Making By Older People: A Test of a Revised Theory of Planned Behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2203_11

51.

Wolfe, M.T., & Shepherd, D.A. (2015). “Bouncing back” from a loss: entrepreneurial orientation, emotions, and failure narratives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 675-700. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fetap.12057

52.

Zhou, G., Xue, K., Yu, M., & Zhou, N. (2018). The effects of perceived deceptiveness and pressure on consumer donation:a mixed-methods study. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(1), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2018-0114

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)