바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Influencing Factors in Fans' Consumer Behavior: BTS Meal Distribution in Indonesia

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2021, v.19 no.9, pp.113-123
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.9.202109.113
SINGER, Narita Gianini
HIDAYAT, Z.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: BTS Meal at McDonald's was launched in May 2021 in selected countries all over the world. BTS fans in Indonesia bought the BTS Meal and collectively donated to the online delivery drivers as a form of empathy. As a quantitative study, this paper aims to identify the influencing factors in sociopsychology for fans to buy products (BTS Meal) available online using celebrity endorsement strategy, as well as demonstrating social empathy as an extended effect. Research design, data and methodology: empirical research was conducted through an online survey sent to 150 participants using the purposive sampling method. Participants were BTS fans, or ARMYs, who bought BTS Meal and conducted donations. Data were then sorted and processed with path regression. Results: preference and role model influenced the buying behavior; however, these factors influenced social empathy only when mediated by consumption. Preference and role model alone did not have a direct influence on social empathy. Conclusions: Consumer behavior insight is relevant in distribution science. A meal distribution involving brand ambassadors is considerable, particularly with celebrities demonstrating quality in capturing fans' hearts through role modeling. When a distribution is conducted online using a brand ambassador, buying behavior could lead to a social impact.

keywords
Consumer Behavior, Distribution, Online Shopping, Fandom, Bangtan Sonyeondan (BTS)

Reference

1.

Acharya, A. S., Prakash, A., Saxena, P., & Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling: Why and how of it. Indian Journal of Medical Specialties, 4(2), 330-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.7713/ijms. 2013 .0032.

2.

Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (1996). Exploratory consumer buying behavior: Conceptualization and measurement. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00037-2.

3.

Brace‐Govan, J. (2013). More diversity than celebrity: A typology of role model interaction. Journal of Social Marketing, 3(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-05-2012-0079.

4.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.

5.

Budi, S. C., Hidayat, Z., & Mani, L. (2021). The Effects of Experience and Brand Relationship to Brand Satisfaction, Trust and Loyalty Shopping Distribution of Consumer Philips Lighting Product in Indonesia. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(1), 115-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.1.202101.115.

6.

Burkhalter, J. N., Curasi, C. F., Thornton, C. G., & Donthu, N. (2017). Music and its multitude of meanings: Exploring what makes brand placements in music videos authentic. Journal of Brand Management, 24(2), 140-160. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0029-5

7.

Cargan, L. (2007). Doing social research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

8.

Chang, W., & Park, S. E. (2019). The fandom of Hallyu, a tribe in the digital network era: The case of ARMY of BTS. Kritika Kultura 32, 261-287.

9.

Chiou, J. S., Huang, C. Y., & Chuang, M. C. (2005). Antecedents of Taiwanese adolescents' purchase intention toward the merchandise of a celebrity: The moderating effect of celebrity adoration. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(3), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.3.317-334.

10.

Chrysochou, P. (2017). Consumer behavior research methods. Consumer Perception of Product Risks and Benefits, 409-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50530-5_22.

11.

Cummins, S., Peltier, J. W., Schibrowsky, J. A., & Nill, A. (2014). Consumer behavior in the online context. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 8(3), 169-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-04-2013-0019.

12.

Dash, S., & Saji, K. B. (2008). The role of consumer self-efficacy and website social-presence in customers' adoption of B2C online shopping: an empirical study in the Indian context. Journal of international consumer marketing, 20(2), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v20n02_04.

13.

Davis, M. H. (2018). Empathy: A social psychological approach. New York, NY: Routledge.

14.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.

15.

Derbaix, M., & Korchia, M. (2019). Individual celebration of pop music icons: A study of music fans relationships with their object of fandom and associated practices. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 18(2), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1751.

16.

Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1086/209506.

17.

Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105-123. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit. 491551710186460.

18.

Duffett, M. (2013). Understanding fandom: An introduction to the study of media fan culture. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.

19.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.

20.

Grashuis, J., Skevas, T., & Segovia, M. S. (2020). Grocery shopping preferences during the COVID-19pandemic. Sustainability, 12(13), 5369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135369.

21.

Gray, J., Sandvoss, C., & Harrington, C. L. (Eds.).(2017). Fandom: Identities and communities in a mediated world. New York, NY: NYU Press.

22.

Guarte, J. M., & Barrios, E. B. (2006). Estimation under purposive sampling. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 35(2), 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610910600591610.

23.

Han, S. S. (2020). A factor effecting online social decisions in online consumer behavior. The Journal of Distribution Science, 18(3), 67-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/ jds.18.3.202003.67.

24.

Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129.

25.

Ho Lee, S., & Jung, K. S. (2018). Loyal customer behaviors:Identifying brand fans. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(8), 1285-1303.

26.

Hoyt, W. T., Leierer, S., & Millington, M. J. (2006). Analysis and interpretation of findings using multiple regression techniques. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 49(4), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6482.

27.

Huang, Y. A., Lin, C., & Phau, I. (2015). Idol attachment and human brand loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 49(7/8), 1234-1255. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2012-0416.

28.

Huang, Y., & Oppewal, H. (2006). Why consumers hesitate to shop online: An experimental choice analysis of grocery shopping and the role of delivery fees. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 34(4/5), 334-353. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550610660260.

29.

Jahn, B., & Kunz, W. (2012). How to transform consumers into fans of your brand. Journal of Service Management, 23(3), 344-361. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231211248444.

30.

Jeon, J. (2015). The strengths and limitations of the statistical modeling of complex social phenomenon: Focusing on SEM, path analysis, or multiple regression models. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 9(5), 1634-1642. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1105869.

31.

Johnson, D. S., Bardhi, F., & Dunn, D. T. (2008). Understanding how technology paradoxes affect customer satisfaction with self‐service technology: The role of performance ambiguity and trust in technology. Psychology & Marketing, 25(5), 416-443. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20218.

32.

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale:Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science &Technology, 7(4), 396.

33.

Jung, S. (2010). Korean masculinities and transcultural consumption: Yonsama, Rain, Oldboy, K-pop idols (Vol. 1). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

34.

Lacasa, P., de la Fuente, J., Garcia-Pernia, M., & Cortes, S. (2017). Teenagers, fandom and identity. Persona Studies, 3(2), 51-65. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.956274108483142.

35.

Lee, J. (2019). BTS and ARMY culture. Seoul, Korea:Communication Books.

36.

Lee, M., Yoo, J., & Ko, E. (2021). A study on the BTS goods values and collaboration brand preference according to fandom type: focusing on BTS fan-club ARMY. Journal of Fashion Business, 25(1), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2021.25.1.165.

37.

Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (2006). The construction of preference. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

38.

Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2017). Theories of human communication (11th ed.). Waveland, IL: Waveland Press.

39.

Loroz, P. S., & Braig, B. M. (2015). Consumer attachments to human brands: The Oprah effect. Psychology & Marketing, 32(7), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20815.

40.

Lu Wang, C. (2017). Exploring the rise of fandom in contemporary consumer culture. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

41.

Maidiana, K., & Hidayat, Z. (2021). Distributing goods and information flow: Factors influencing online purchasing behavior of Indonesian consumers. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(7), 5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.7.202107.5.

42.

McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2002). Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. British Journal of Psychology, 93(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162454.

43.

McLaren, C., & Dal Yong, J. I. N. (2020). You can’t help but love them: BTS, transcultural fandom, and affective identities. Korea Journal, 60(1), 100-127. doi:10.25024/kj.2020.60.1.100.

44.

Miles, J. (2005). R-Squared, adjusted R-Squared. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, 4, 1655-1657. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa526.

45.

Nelson, O., & Deborah, A. (2017). Celebrity endorsement influence on brand credibility: A critical review of previous studies. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2577.

46.

Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Psychometric theory 25 years ago and now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X004010007.

47.

Oh, M. J., Hwnag, Y. Y., Quan, Z. X., & Jung, J. C. (2014). The effect of three different generation types on prosocial consumption behavior. The Journal of Distribution Science, 12(3), 55-63. doi: 10.13106/jds.2014.vol12.no3.55.

48.

Park, S., & Lee, D. (2017). An empirical study on consumer online shopping channel choice behavior in omni-channel environment. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1398-1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.06.003.

49.

Riggio, R. E., Tucker, J., & Coffaro, D. (1989). Social skills and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(1), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(89)90184-0.

50.

Saleem, A., Ghafar, A., Ibrahim, M., Yousuf, M., & Ahmed, N. (2015). Product perceived quality and purchase intention with consumer satisfaction. Global journal of management and business research, 15(1E).

51.

Sandvoss, C. (2005). Fans: The mirror of consumption. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

52.

Segal, E. (2018). Social empathy. New York Chichester, UK:Columbia University Press.

53.

Segal, E. A., Cimino, A. N., Gerdes, K. E., Harmon, J. K., & Wagaman, M. A. (2013). A confirmatory factor analysis of the interpersonal and social empathy index. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4(3), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2013.9.

54.

Simonson, I. (2008). Will I like a medium pillow? Another look at constructed and inherent preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2008.04.002.

55.

Singh, D. P. (2014). Online shopping motivations, information search, and shopping intentions in an emerging economy. The Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 4(3), 5-12. doi: 10.13106/eajbm.2014.vol4.no3.5.

56.

Smith, B. G., Kendall, M. C., Knighton, D., & Wright, T. (2018). Rise of the brand ambassador: Social stake, corporate social responsibility and influence among the social media influencers. Communication Management Review, 3(01), 6-29. https://doi.org/10.22522/cmr20180127.

57.

Solomon, M., Russell-Bennett, R., & Previte, J.(2012). Consumer behaviour (3rd ed.). Frenchs Forest, NSW:Pearson Higher Education AU.

58.

Thomson, M. (2006). Human brands: Investigating antecedents to consumers’ strong attachments to celebrities. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 104–19. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.104.

59.

Touhami, B., & Al-Haq, F. A. (2017). The influence of the Korean Wave on the language of international fans: Case study of Algerian fans. Sino-US English Teaching, 14(10), 598-626. doi:10.17265/1539-8072/2017.10.004.

60.

Turčínková, J., & Stávková, J. (2009). Changes in consumer behavior on the market with food. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun, 57(3), 173-178.

61.

Vehovar, V., Toepoel, V., & Steinmetz, S. (2016). Non-probability sampling. The Sage Handbook of Survey Methods, 329-345.

62.

Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4.

63.

Williamson, G. R. (2003). Misrepresenting random sampling? A systematic review of research papers in the Journal of Advanced Nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(3), 278-288. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02803.x.

64.

Yoo, C. K., & Kim, G. P. (2019). An empirical analysis on the compromised delivery model of traditional market using delivery application. The Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 10(10), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2019.vol10.no10.45.

65.

Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151.

The Journal of Distribution Science