International Trade between Colombia and Asia in the Framework of Logistics Processes: A Bibliometric Review

NIEBLES-NUNEZ, William (School of Economics, Universidad de Sucre)
RAMIREZ, Javier (School of Economic, Corporacion Universitaria Latinoamericana)
GARCIA-TIRADO, Jhony (Corporacion Universitaria Taller Cinco)

NIEBLES-NUNEZ, William, RAMIREZ, Javier, & GARCIA-TIRADO, Jhony. (2022). International Trade between Colombia and Asia in the Framework of Logistics Processes: A Bibliometric Review. The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS), 20(10), 39-50, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.10.202210.39

복사

Abstract

Purpose: This report aimed to review the literature on the research topic "Imports and exports between Colombia and Asian countries in the framework of logistics processes in international trade" of the last ten years. Research design, data and methodology: Documents indexed in the Web of Science metasearch engine were used as a source of information. The 500 most relevant downloaded in bibTex format were worked on and their processing was carried out using the statistical software Excel and R, through the Bibliometrix package. Results: The results indicate that the country that makes the most contributions to the research area is the United States (274), the author that publishes the most is Bahmani-Oskooee M., with (11) research, 424 of the documents found are journal articles, and the institution that contributes the most in this area is the University of Wisconsin. Conclusions: It is concluded that scientific production within the framework of international trade between Asia and Colombia has had a notable increase, which can be explained by the opening of both continents as strategic allies and the new vision of logistics processes taking advantage of the strategic location of countries within the Pacific Ocean.

keywords: Import, Export, Colombia, Asia, Logistics

참고문헌

Alves, F. (2019). Exemplifying the Bradford’s Law: an analysis of recent research (2014-2019) on capital structure. Journal of Social Sciences in Perspective, 18(35), 92-101. https://doi.org/10.48075/revistacsp.v18i35.21801

Aristei, D., Castellani, D., & Franco, C. (2013). Firms’ exporting and importing activities: is there a two-way relationship? Review of World Economics, 149(1), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-012-0137-y

Arize, A., & Bahmani, M. (2018). Do imports and exports adjust nonlinearly? Evidence from 100 countries. Global Economy Journal, 18(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2017-0094

Barajas, J., & Méndez, M. (2021). Traditional Farmers Producing for the Agricultural Export Market: Causes and Consequences of Said Productive Change. Lasallian Journal of Research, 18(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v18n1a5

Bas, M., & Strauss, V. (2014). Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm-level evidence from France. Review of World Economics, 150(2), 241-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-013-0175-0

Becerril, O., Munguía, G., & Nava, R. (2021). Effect of container movement on the efficiency of the main cargo operating economies of APEC. Mexico and the Pacific Rim, 10(30), 141-168. https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v10i30.739

Bernal, G., Strobel, J. A. A., & Praj, D. P. (2019). Approaches to the new world scenario: Colombia on the Asia Pacific region. Scenarios: company and territory, 8(11), 1-26. http://esumer.edu.co/revistas/index.php/escenarios/article/vie w/17

Bobadilla, J., & Venegas, A. (2018). The importance of ports within the economy in Colombia and its bordering countries. Point of View, 9(13), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15765/pdv.v9i13.1115

Bórquez, A. (2022). Trade Facilitation Under the Pacific Alliance Framework: Seaports Case. In China’s Trade Policy in Latin America. Springer, Cham, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98664-3_9

10.

Cáceres, J. (2022). Chinese Export Promotion Policies Toward Latin America: The Belt and Road Initiative. In China’s Trade Policy in Latin America. Springer, Cham, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98664-3_5

11.

Cadot, O., Carrère, C., & Strauss‐Kahn, V. (2013). Trade diversification, income, and growth: what do we know? Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(4), 790-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00719.x

12.

Cantillo, J., Cantillo, V., & Arellana, J. (2018). Modelling with joint choice of ports and countries of origin and destination:application to Colombian ports. Maritime Policy &Management, 45(6), 720-738. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1440090

13.

Capobianco, M., Casado, M., Marín, G., & Terán, E. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of international competitiveness (1983–2017). Sustainability, 11(7), 1877-1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071877

14.

Dedeoğlu, D., & Kaya, H. (2013). Energy use, exports, imports, and GDP: New evidence from the OECD countries. Energy Policy, 57(1), 469-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.016

15.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(1), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

16.

Dorta, A. (2018). Science with measures. Bibliometric and scientometric studiesin a new section. Havana Journal of Medical Sciences, 17(4), 508-509. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-519X2018000400508

17.

Engel, C., & Wang, J. (2011). International trade in durable goods:Understanding volatility, cyclicality, and elasticities. Journal of International Economics, 83(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.08.007

18.

Fan, H., Li, Y. A., & Yeaple, S. R. (2015). Trade liberalization, quality, and export prices. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(5), 1033-1051. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00524

19.

Feng, L., Li, Z., & Swenson, D. L. (2016). The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from Chinese firms. Journal of International Economics, 101(1), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.03.004

20.

Figueiredo, R., Quelhas, O., Vieira, J., & Ferreira, J. J. (2019). The role of knowledge intensive business services in economic development: a bibliometric analysis from Bradford, Lotka and Zipf laws. Management and Production, 26(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X4356-19

21.

Flores, C., & Aguilera, R. (2019). Bibliometric indicators and their importance in clinical research. Why know them? Journal of the Spanish pain society, 26(5), 315-316. https://dx.doi.org/10.20986/resed.2018.3659/2018

22.

Giuffrida, M., Mangiaracina, R., Perego, A., & Tumino, A. (2019). Cross-border B2C e-commerce to China: An evaluation of different logistics solutions under uncertainty. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 50(3), 355-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2018-0311

23.

Hang, H. T., & Adjouro, T. (2021). The Effects of Cross-Border ECommerce on International Trade and Economic Growth: A Case of China. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 13(12), 82-89-https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v13n12p82

24.

Haug, A. A., & Ucal, M. (2019). The role of trade and FDI for CO2emissions in Turkey: Nonlinear relationships. Energy Economics, 81(1), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.04.006

25.

Kasahara, H., & Rodrigue, J. (2008). Does the use of imported intermediates increase productivity? Plant-level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.12.008

26.

Kasahara, H., & Lapham, B. (2013). Productivity and the decision to import and export: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics, 89(2), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.08.005

27.

Kollie, G. B. (2022). International Trade, Economic Growth and Governance: Evidence from ECOWAS Member Countries. African Journal of Economic Review, 10(3), 150-166. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajer/article/view/227067

28.

Lacka, E., Chan, H. K., & Wang, X. (2020). Technological advancements and B2B international trade: A bibliometric analysis and review of industrial marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 88(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.007

29.

MasIc, I. (2021). Bibliometric Indices and its Role for the Quality Assessment of the Author's Published Content in the Scientific Journals. Int J Biomed Healthc, 9(4), 244-253. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijbh.2021.9.244-253

30.

Mejia, C., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2021). Exploring topics in bibliometric research through citation networks and semantic analysis. Frontiers In Research Metrics and Analytics, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.742311

31.

Merediz, I., & Bariviera, A. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of bitcoin scientific production. Research in International Business and Finance, 50(1), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.06.008

32.

Martínez, S., López, D., & Ojeda, D. (2018). Comparative study of the ports of San Antonio and Buenaventura with a view to improving competitiveness: Case of Colombia. Point of View, 9(14), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.15765/pdv.v9i14.1181

33.

Murugan, M., Saravanakumar, R., & Thirumagal, A. (2019). Lotka's law and pattern of author productivity of information literacy research output. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2509(1), 1-18. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/215162173.pdf

34.

Muûls, M. (2015). Exporters, importers and credit constraints. Journal of International Economics, 95(2), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.003

35.

Nattar, S. (2019). Application of Lotka's law to the scientific production of Indian Journal of Physics. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9(1), 36-42.

36.

Price, D. (1986). Little science, big science... and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

37.

Quevedo, M., Vásquez, L., Quevedo, J., & Pinzon, L. (2020). COVID-19 and its effects on international trade. Ecuador case. Science Domain, 6(3), 1006-1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.23857/dc.v6i3.1330

38.

Ramos, S. B., & Veiga, H. (2013). Oil price asymmetric effects:Answering the puzzle in international stock markets. Energy Economics, 38(1), 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.03.011

39.

Rana, R., & Sharma, M. (2019). Dynamic causality testing for EKC hypothesis, pollution haven hypothesis and international trade in India. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 28(3), 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2018.1542451

40.

Sadorsky, P. (2012). Energy consumption, output and trade in South America. Energy Economics, 34(2), 476-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.12.008

41.

Schroeder, T. C., & Tonsor, G. T. (2012). International cattle ID and traceability: Competitive implications for the US. Food Policy, 37(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.10.005

42.

Su, B., & Ang, B. W. (2013). Input–output analysis of CO2emissions embodied in trade: competitive versus noncompetitive imports. Energy Policy, 56(1), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.041

43.

Tang, X., Snowden, S., & Höök, M. (2013). Analysis of energy embodied in the international trade of UK. Energy Policy, 57(1), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.009

44.

Tomás-Górriz, V., & Tomás-Casterá, V. (2018). Bibliometrics in the evaluation of scientific activity. Home Hospital, 2(4), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.22585/hospdomic.v2i4.51

45.

Torres, G. (2021). Colombia and Asia-Pacific: an analysis of the evolution of relations with this important zone. Razón Crítica, 1(11), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.21789/25007807.1697

46.

Vega, L., Cantillo, V., & Arellana, J. (2019). Assessing the impact of major infrastructure projects on port choice decision: The Colombian case. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 120(1), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.021

47.

Wagner, J. (2013). Exports, imports and firm survival: First evidence for manufacturing enterprises in Germany. Review of World Economics, 149(1), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-012-0141-2

48.

Wang, Y., Wu, C., & Yang, L. (2013). Oil price shocks and stock market activities: Evidence from oil-importing and oilexporting countries. Journal of Comparative economics, 41(4), 1220-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.12.004

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.20 No.10

International Trade between Colombia and Asia in the Framework of Logistics Processes: A Bibliometric Review

International Trade between Colombia and Asia in the Framework of Logistics Processes: A Bibliometric Review

Abstract

참고문헌

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)