The Distribution Role of Entrepreneurship Mindset and Task Technology Fit: An Extended Model of Theory of Planned Behavior

RUSTIANA,, Y. , MOHD,, O. b. , & MOHAMAD,, N. b. (2022). The Distribution Role of Entrepreneurship Mindset and Task Technology Fit: An Extended Model of Theory of Planned Behavior. The Journal of Distribution Science, 20(5), 85-96, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.20.05.202205.85

copy

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to dissemination a new concept based on empirical research on enhancing entrepreneurship intention (EI) in the theory of planned behavior (TPB) through entrepreneurship mindset (EM) and task technology fit (TTF). The TTF is a moderating variable in strengthening the relationship between EM and EI. Research design, data, and methodology: This research design was quantitative research. The respondents were 202 students from Malaysia and Indonesia who had filled out and collected an online questionnaire in Microsoft form. Three hypotheses examined the direct influence and the indirect impact of EM on EI through antecedent variables of TPB, and the effect of TTF as moderating variable to enhance the relationship between EM and EI. The data was analyzed using the WarpPLS version 7.0. Results: The result showed that EM had a significant impact on the students' EI. The interaction of EM and TTF was significantly able to improve EI. Conclusions: The findings contributed new ideas to develop the theoretical framework of the TPB model and were able be utilized by lecturers to consider the integration of EM and TTF in the model. The novelty of this study elaborated the EM and TTF variables as an extended model of the TPB.

keywords: Entrepreneurship Mindset, Theory of Planned Behavior, Task Technology Fit, Moderating Variable, Dissemination

Reference

Ahmed, T., Chandran, V. G. R., Klobas, J. E., Liñán, F., & Kokkalis, P. (2020). Entrepreneurship education programmes: How learning, inspiration and resources affect intentions for new venture creation in a developing economy. International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100327

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Alam, M. Z., Kousar, S., & Rehman, C. A. (2019). Role of entrepreneurial motivation on entrepreneurial intentions and behaviour: theory of planned behaviour extension on engineering students in Pakistan. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(50), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0175-1

Aleksandrova, E., Gerry, C. J., & Verkhovskaya, O. (2019). Missing entrepreneurs The importance of attitudes and control in shaping entrepreneurial intentions in Russia control. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 12(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-11-2018-0133

Alghamdi, F. (2018). Predicting entrepreneurial intention of undergraduate students in an efficiency-driven economy : an application of the theory of planned behavior. Al-Baha University Journal of Human Sciences, January 2018.

Alshebami, A. S., Al-Jubari, I., Alyoussef, I. Y., & Raza, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial education as a predicator of community college of Abqaiq students’ entrepreneurial intention. Management Science Letters, 10(15), 3605–3612. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.033

Badpa, A., Salim, J., Yahaya, J., & Kotamjani, S. S. (2018). The determinant factors of kms usage towards organizational performance in oil and gas industry. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(9), 2519–2533.

Bueckmann-Diegoli, R., Salmones, G. de los, Sánchez, M. del M., & San Martín Gutiérrez, H. (2021). The development of entrepreneurial alertness in undergraduate students. Education and Training, 63(7–8), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2019-0042

Bukie, F. (2015). Task Technology Fit and Lecturers Performance Impacts : The Technology Utilization , Satisfaction and Performance ( TUSPEM ) Dimension. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 12(3), 232–239.

10.

Cao, V. Q., & Ngo, T. T. T. (2019). Linking entrepreneurial intentions and mindset models: A comparative study of public and private universities in Vietnam. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 21(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.34753

11.

Chen, Y. S., & Huang, S. Y. B. (2017). The effect of task-technology fit on purchase intention: The moderating role of perceived risks. Journal of Risk Research, 20(11), 1418–1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1165281

12.

Davis, M. H., Hall, J. A., & Mayer, P. S. (2016). Developing a New Measure of Entrepreneurial Mindset: Reliability, Validity, and Implications for Practitioners. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 68(1), 21-48. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000045

13.

Farrukh, M., Sajid, M., & Waheed, A. (2019). Entrepreneurial intentions perspective of theory of planned behaviour. Education + Training, 61(7/8), 984-1000. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-09-2018-0194

14.

Galvão, A., Marques, C. S., & Marques, C. P. (2018). Antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions among students in vocational training programmes. Education and Training, 60(7–8), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2017-0034

15.

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 19(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

16.

Gorlewicz, J. L., & Jayaram, S. (2020). Instilling Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value in Entrepreneurial Minded Engineering: Concepts for a Course Sequence in Dynamics and Controls. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419879469

17.

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C. and Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

18.

Hair, Joe F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

19.

Hair, Joseph F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Corrigendum to “Editorial Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance” Long Range Planning, 47(6), 392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.016

20.

Hair JR, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

21.

Hamilton, K., Phipps, D. J., Schmidt, P., Bamberg, S., & Ajzen, I. (2022). First test of the theory of reasoned goal pursuit: predicting physical activity. Psychology & Health, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2026946

22.

Handayati, P., Wulandari, D., Soetjipto, B. E., Wibowo, A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2020). Does entrepreneurship education promote vocational students’ entrepreneurial mindset? Heliyon, 6(11), e05426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05426

23.

Isaac, O., Aldholay, A., Abdullah, Z., & Ramayah, T. (2019). Online learning usage within Yemeni higher education: The role of compatibility and task-technology fit as mediating variables in the IS success model. Computers and Education, 136(November 2017), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.012

24.

Janib, J., Rasdi, R. M., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2022). The Influence of Career Commitment and Workload on Academics’ Job Satisfaction: The Moderating Role of a Supportive Environment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.1

25.

Karimi, S. (2020). The role of entrepreneurial passion in the formation of students’ entrepreneurial intentions. Applied Economics, 52(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1645287

26.

Kock, N. (2020). WarpPLS User Manual : Version 7.0 (Issue August 2020). ScriptWarp Systems. www.scriptwarp.com

27.

Krueger, Jr., N. F., & Brazeal, D. V. (2018). Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs. Iberoamerican Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 7(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v7i2.1071

28.

Liang, T. P., Ling, Y. L., Yeh, Y. H., & Lin, B. (2013). Contextual factors and continuance intention of mobile services. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 11(4), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2013.055746

29.

Lindner, J. (2020). Entrepreneurship Education by Youth Start - Entrepreneurial Challenge-Based Learning. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 916(March), 866-875. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_80

30.

Maritz, A., Perenyi, A., de Waal, G., & Buck, C. (2020). Entrepreneurship as the unsung hero during the current COVID-19 economic crisis: Australian perspectives, 12(11), 4612-4621, Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114612

31.

Martinez Dy, A. (2022). Levelling the playing field? Towards a critical-social perspective on digital entrepreneurship. Futures, 135 (Januari 2022),102438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102438

32.

Mingolla, C., Hudders, L., Vanwesenbeeck, I., & Claerebout, E. (2019). Towards a biased mindset: An extended Theory of Planned Behaviour framework to predict farmers’ intention to adopt a sustainable mange control approach. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 169 (August 2019), 104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104695

33.

Nabi, G., LiñáN, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(2), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026

34.

Naumann, C., & Naumann, C. (2017). Entrepreneurial Mindset : A Synthetic Literature Review. 5(3), 149–172.

35.

Nguyen P.M., Dinh V.T., Luu T.-M.-N., C. Y. (2020). Sociological and theory of planned behaviour approach to understanding entrepreneurship: Comparison of Vietnam and South Korea. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1815288

36.

Otache, I., Umar, K., Audu, Y., & Onalo, U. (2019). The effects of entrepreneurship education on students’ entrepreneurial intentions: A longitudinal approach. Education and Training, 63(7/8), 967–991. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2019-0005

37.

Rahman, M., & Mohammad. (2017). Entrepreneurship Mindset for Students’ Entrepreneurship Build-Up: a Review Paper. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Advanced Scientific Research and Innovation.

38.

Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., Medina-Garrido, J. A., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2019). Why not now? Intended timing in entrepreneurial intentions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(4), 1221-1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00586-5

39.

Safra, W., Wan, D., Ghani, A., Zulkarnaen, N., & Tse, T. (2018). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Analysis on Factors Influencing Textile Cyberpreneur ’ s Intention to Adopt Cloud-Based m-Retail Application. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.164

40.

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology and Marketing, 39(5), 1035–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21640

41.

Sharahiley, S. M. (2020). Examining Entrepreneurial Intention of the Saudi Arabia’s University Students: Analyzing Alternative Integrated Research Model of TPB and EEM. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(December), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-019-00231-8

42.

Sharma, S. K. (2019). Entrepreneurial intention of students: A case of NIT Hamirpur (HP, India). International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 22(3), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2019.099297

43.

Wu, W. H., Wei, C. W., Yu, M. C., & Kao, H. Y. (2020). Exploring Factors Surrounding Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions in Medical Informatics: The Theory of Planning Behavior Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(October 2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.544887

44.

Yu, T., & Yu, T. (2010). Modelling the factors that affect individuals’ utilisation of online learning systems: An empirical study combining the task technology fit model with the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01054.x

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.20 No.5

The Distribution Role of Entrepreneurship Mindset and Task Technology Fit: An Extended Model of Theory of Planned Behavior

Abstract

Reference

The Journal of Distribution Science