바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effects of Advanced Design Innovation Strategy on Business Performance

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2013, v.11 no.10, pp.27-36
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jds.2013.vol11.no10.27.
Kim, Yong-Wook
Song, In-Am
Hwang, Hee-Joong
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This paper empirically studies the effects of advanced design innovation strategy on business performance, to investigate manufacturing industries that can develop design-driven-innovation strategies. Many researchers now recognize the importance of design in a CEO's decision-making process. To analyze these effects, this study deduces the definition of advanced design strategy by reviewing existing studies. The advanced design is a strategy that is applied to improve business performance instead of the appearance of a product for increasing its sales. In terms of business processes, the advanced design strategy is defined as the incorporation of business activities prior to the development of the product, to offer new experiences and values to users, from those designs. Research design/data/methodology - This paper establishes a model for empirical analysis. In this study, we derived factors of the characteristics of advanced design based on previous studies. We tried to investigate whether advanced design innovation strategy and entrepreneur's characteristics could have any impact on business performance. At the same time, we tried to find out the moderating effect of entrepreneurs' characteristics. The advanced design is made up of three elements: precedence, integration, and immersion of design activities. These three elements are independent variables for the model. The dependent variables are: increased rate of sales, R & D performance, and public image of the company. Specifically, this study establishes a CEO's characteristics as a moderating variable between the independent and dependent variables. Results - We proved that the level of entrepreneurs' characteristics has a moderating effect on the business performance. The findings of this study offer the following theoretical implications. The precedence of design activities positively affects the increased rate of sales by offering new experiences to users and creating new values. The integration of design activities also has a positive effect on the R&D performance. In addition, the immersion of design activities positively influences all the elements comprising business performance. The analysis of moderating variables elucidates that CEO's characteristics have a moderating role between precedence, integration, and immersion of design activities, and business performance. Conclusions - The practical implications of the study are as follows. This study contributes to the progression of advance design theories by conducting an empirical study on the advanced design concept. More importantly, the empirical study on the CEO group seeking exploratory innovation supports Verganti's "design-driven innovation" concept, according to which design can make innovation successful by offering useful values to users, as evident in the case of many innovative companies, such as Nintendo and Apple. Future studies need to investigate the reliability of practical examples, including the various activities of business. We suppose that there may be real differences between the results of this study and the applicative situation in the presence of a CEO group.

keywords
Advanced Design, Design Driven Innovation, Business Performance

Reference

1.

Abernathy, W., & Clark, K. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the Winds of Creative Destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3~22.

2.

Buxton, B. (2010). Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design (Interactive Technologies). San Francisco, CA, US: Morgan Kaufmann.

3.

Chae, Hee-Won, & Song, Jae-Yong (2009). The Impact of Top Management Team Demography on Technological Innovations in High-Technology Firms. Journal of Strategic Management, 12(2), 83~104.

4.

Choi, Hong-Dae (2009). A Study on the Effects of the SMEs CEO‘s Characteristics on the Business Performance : Focused on Northern Area of Chung-Buk. Choongju, Korea: Master's thesis in Choongju University.

5.

Gemser, G., & Leenders, M. A. A. M. (2001). How Integrating Industrial Design in the Product Development Process Impacts on Company Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(1), 28~38.

6.

Gorb, P., & Dumas, A. (1987). Silent Design. Design Studies, 8(3), 150~156.

7.

Ha, Su-Kyung, Kim, Yoo-Jin, & Shin, Cheol-Ho (2009). Advanced Design Concept and Typology in Korea Design Industry. Journal of Commodity Science and Technology, 27(2), 131~143.

8.

Hertenstein, J. H., Marjorie, B. P., & Veryzer, R. W. (2005). The Impact of Industrial Design Effectiveness on Corporate Financial Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 3~21.

9.

Huh, Jae-Kwan (2010). Management Strategy of Intellectual Property for Corporate Competitiveness. Journal of Korean Listed Companies Association, 61, 107~127.

10.

Hwang, Gyu-Young, Kim, Do-Hyeon, & Ryu, Chung-Suk (2009). Design Management Research Trend and its Role as a Management Strategy. Korean Corporation Management Review, 16(2), 221~241.

11.

Jung, Jae-Young (2006). Collapse Innovation, It's Time for Design. LG Economy Weekly, 896, 21~25.

12.

Khan, A. M., & Manopichetwattana, V. (1989). Innovative and Noninnovative Small Firms : Types and Characteristics. Management Science, 35(5), 597~606.

13.

Kim, Gye-Soo(2007). Amos 16.0 Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Seoul, Korea: Hanarae.

14.

Kim, Ho-Gon(2007). An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Design Strategy and Business Performances. Seoul, Korea : Thesis for Doctorate in Kookmin University.

15.

Kim, Ho-Gon(2011). The Relationship between CEO’s Design Leadership and Business Performance. Journal of Korea Design Knowledge, 20, 91~100.

16.

Kim, Ho-Gon, & Baik, Gi-Bok (2008). An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Design Strategy and Business Performances. Proceedings of 2008 Summer Conference of Korean Society of Strategic Management. Seoul, Korea : Korean Society of Strategic Management.

17.

Kim, Hyun (1996). A Study on the Anterior Decision Design Factor in Product Development -An Approach to the Multi-Sequential Design Process. Journal of Korean Society of Design Science, 13, 45~53.

18.

Kim, So-Young, Park, Young-Chun, & Lee, Moon-Kyu (2007). The Integration and Communication Between Marketing and Design Functions in the Development of New Products. Journal of Commodity Science and Technology, 25(1), 11~24.

19.

Kim, Young-Joe(2007). An Empirical Study on the Impacts of Strategic Leadership, R&D Investment, and Human Resource Management Practices on Innovation Performance. Korean Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(4), 49~83.

20.

Lee, Do-Myung, & Lim, Seong-Joon (2012). Determinants of Exploitative & Exploratory Innovation Activities and Their Effects on Innovation Output and Perceived Performance. Journal of Strategic Management, 15(1), 1~31.

21.

Lee, Jong-Seok (2004). The Research about Improvement Design Process for Increasing Quality of Small-Medium Enterprises. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Sejong University.

22.

Lee, Kyung-Mi (2004). Impact Analysis of Design Management Mechanism on Management Performance : Emphasis on Domestic Company with Export Brands. Design and Brand Management Journal, 1(1), 68~96.

23.

Mozota, B. (2003). Design Management : Using Design to Build Brand Value and Corporate Innovation. New York, US: Allworth Press.

24.

Park, Joo-Hyun (2011). The Design Values for Design-Centered Innovation-Based on Innovative Digital Media. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Ewha Womans University.

25.

Park, Sang-Moon, & Lee, Byung-Heon (2008). The Impact of Exploration, Exploitation, and R&D Organization on Innovations in the Korean SMEs. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 11(1), 118~143.

26.

Roy, R., Potter, S., & Riedel, J. C. K. H. (1999). The Long-Term Benefits of Investment in Design and Product Development. in Jerrard B., Trueman M. & Newport R. (Eds.) Managing New Product Innovation, London, UK: Taylor and Francis.142~154.

27.

Shin, Chung-Sang (2011). A study on the performance of small manufacturing firms in view of personality of CEO and employee. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Hanyang University.

28.

Souder, W. M. E. (1998). Managing New Product Innovations. Lanham, MD, US: Lexington Books.

29.

Verganti, R. (2003). Design as Brokering of languages : The Role of Designers in the Innovation Strategy of Italian Firms. Design Management Journal, 14(3), 34~42.

30.

Verganti, R. (2008). Design, Meanings and Radical Innovation : A Meta-model and a Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 436~456.

31.

Verganti, R. (2009). Design Driven Innovation. Boston, MA, US: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

32.

Veryzer, R. W., & Mozota, B. (2005). The Impact of User-Oriented Design on New Product Development : An Examination of Fundamental Relationships. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(2), 128~143.

33.

Ughanawa, D. O. (1988). Better Ways of Managing Design. The Queen's Award Winners' Experience. Technovation, 7(4), 377~398.

34.

Whyte, J., Davies, A., Salter, A., & Gann, D. (2003). Designing to compete: Lessons from Millennium Product winners. Design Studies, 24(5), 395~409.

35.

Yoo, Myung-Keun(2005). A study on the design consulting firms globalization through advanced design development and marketing strategies. Seoul, Korea: Master's thesis in Kyoung-Hee University.

36.

Yu, Jong-Pil (2012). The Concept and Understandings of Structural Equation Modeling. Seoul, Korea: Hanarae.

The Journal of Distribution Science