바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1738-3110
  • E-ISSN2093-7717
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

소매유통업의 효율성 분석에 관한 연구

An analysis of retail business efficiency in Korea

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS) / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2014, v.12 no.4, pp.23-30
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.12.4.201404.23
김순홍 (Division of International Trade, Incheon National University)
유병국 (Division of International Trade, Incheon National University)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to analyze the efficiency of retail businesses by dividing domestic retailers into discount stores, super supermarkets (SSMs), and department stores. It suggests retail-business investment strategies by using data environment analysis (DEA) to analyze how input elements such as store area, parking lot area, number of employees, and sales management expenses for the convenience of customers positively affect business performance measurements such as sales and visiting customers per day. Research Design, Data, and Methodology - The DEA model calculates a ratio of the weighted mean of various inputs to the weighted mean of various outputs and measures the efficiency of a specific decision making unit (DMU). The study included 19 companies (five discount store DMUs, ten SSM DMUs, and four department store DMUs). Because the business elements and sizes of retail store DMUs used in this analysis are different, average per-store input and output variables were used. Data were collected from "The Yearbook of Retail Industry in Korea (2012)." DEA analysis was used to determine differences in efficiency among discount stores, SSMs, and department stores in terms of the business elements of each retail business. It was also used to determine what business elements were excessively invested in by comparing and analyzing efficiency by business elements using SPSS software's ANOVA (Analysis of Variance). Results - The CCR and BCC efficiency analysis found that the efficiency of discount stores is low. We believe that the saturation state of discount stores is a major factor. The ANOVA analysis confirms the VRS hypothesis with a statistically significant difference among the three groups, based on an analysis confidence interval of 95%. CRS and SE were not found to be significantly different among the three groups. As for the post hoc test, which concretely shows differences by group, the Scheffe's multiple comparison analysis test found the average differences between group 1 (discount stores) and group 2 (SSM) to be statistically significant. Conclusions - The DEA efficiency analysis implies that investment in input elements, including store area, parking lot area, and sales management expenses, were excessive in the case of discount stores, while SSMs need to invest more in promotion activities such as gifts, events, and coupons for customer management. Department stores have found that small companies invest excessively in input elements. Department stores need to invest in differentiated shopping mall complexes. This study was limited in acquiring statistical data; various input variables which might have shown more secure customer management and promotional expenses could not be applied. As the study was limited in various aspects of the efficiency analyses because financial analyses of the companies and of causal relationships, including satisfaction and loyalty of visiting customers, were not done, these aspects will be examined in the next study.

keywords
DEA Analysis, ANOVA Analysis, Discount Stores, Super Supermarkets(SSM), Department Stores

참고문헌

1.

Ahn, Sung-Woo, & Kwon, Sung-Ku (2012). The Effect of Store Characteristics of a Supermarket on Store Loyalty: A Comparative Study of the Local Supermarket and the Super Supermarket. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(11), 61-70.

2.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Models Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(10), 1078-1092.

3.

Byun Ji Yuong (2008). Efficiency study on individual discount stores within a large, multi-store, multi-market retail chain. Seoul, Korea: Master's thesis in Korea University, 9-16.

4.

Charnes. A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. L. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.

5.

Cooper, W.W., Lawerence, M. F., & Kaoru, T. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis. New York: Springer.

6.

Dubelaar C., Bhargava M., & Ferrarin D. (2002). Measuring Retail Productivity: What really matters? Journal of Business Research, 55, 417-426.

7.

Donthu, Naveen, & Yoo, Boong hee (1998). Retail Productivity Assessment Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Retailing, 74(1), 89-105.

8.

Hong Bong Yong, & Ki Hyun Hee (2003). Measuring Efficiency of Department stores by DEA. Journal of Korea Accounting Information, 21(4), 307-327.

9.

Kim, Soon-Hong (2012), A Study on the Impact of Customer Equity on Customer Loyalty in the Korean Retail Industry: Mediation of Customer Satisfaction and Switching Costs. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(11), 79-88.

10.

Kim, Dae-Yun, & Kwon, Sung-Ku (2013). A Study on the Korea Distribution Promotion Policy and Adjustment Policy. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(4), 89-97.

11.

Kim, S. H., & Yoo, B. K. (2013). Analysis of the Traditional Market’s CRM Activities. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(5), 43-53.

12.

Kim, Sang-Youn, Km, Pan-Jin, & Youn, Myoung-Kil (2012). A Practical Study on the New Revenue Estimate Model Of SSM. Journal of Distribution Science, 7(1), 5-19.

13.

Kim T. Y., Lim Y. R., & Kim Y. K. (1999). Evaluating Efficiency of Korean Mass Discount Stores: A Case Study. Journal of Operations Research and Management Science, 16(3), 1-11.

14.

Lee Mi-Ae (2011). An Analysis of Efficiency in Retail Business:comparison of the Stock Market and the KOSDAQ Market of the Korean Exchange. Taegu, Korea: Master's thesis in Yeungnam University. 12-27.

15.

Lee, Young-Chul, & Yang, Hoe-Chang (2012). Enhancing the Competitiveness of Organic Food Shops Using the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(10), 11-16.

16.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithamal, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, Spring, 64(1), 12-40.

17.

Park, M. H. (2008). Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Seoul, Korea. Korea Study Information(KSI), 66-80.

18.

Peppers, D., & Rogers, M.(1997). Enterprise One-to-one: Tools for Competing in the Interactive Age. New York, NY.:Doubleday.

19.

Rim, Y. R., & Park, J. H. (2007). Applying DEA Models to Analyze Unit Store Efficiency of Discount Stores. Journal of Korean Distribution and Management, 26(3), 51-74.

20.

Rim, Y. R., & Kim K. Y. (2009). A Study on the Efficiency Evaluation of Large-Scale Discount Stores Using both DEA and Consumer Satisfaction Survey. Journal of Korea Regional Economics Association, 13, 119-144.

21.

Suh, Chung Won (2011). A Study on Scale of the stores of Hanaromart. Seoul, Korea: NHERI report, 160, 1-42.

22.

Suh, Geun-Ha, Park, Seung-Je, & Suh, Chang-Soo (2012). A Study on the Collaboration Development between the SSM and Traditional Markets in Korean Government Policies. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(11), 55-60.

23.

The Yearbook of Retail Industry (2012). The Yearbook. Seoul, Korea: Korea Chain Store Association.

24.

Youn, Myoung-Kil, Kim, Jong-Jin, Park, Chul-Ju, & Shim, Kyu-Yeol (2013). A Study on the Sale Estimate Model of a Large-Scale Store in Korea, Journal of Distribution Science, 11(12), 5-11.

The Journal of Distribution Science(JDS)